similar to: pronunciation?

Hello, LLVMers. I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? Thanks, Seung

On Jul 3, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > Hello, LLVMers. > > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? We've been pronouncing it kl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: abreve.gif Type: image/gif Size: 62 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Timo, What is the "official" way to pronounce Dovecot? Is there a meaning to the word? A background on why you chose it? -- Jesse Peterson erage at softhome.net

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? I pronounce it just like the english word, which is probably one of your later two options :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Greets, Every linux user that sets up a sound card using sndconfig heres Linus pronouncing "Linux" - I confess that's how I learned to pronounce it right, until then I prononced it 'l-EYE-nucks' - I was wondering - what's the correct pronounciation of 'Ogg Vorbis'? I pronounce it 'OOOg' (a long 'O' sound or a portuguese 'U' if you must

Has anyone succeeded in compiling R-1.1.0 on a Digital (Compaq) Alpha running OSF4.0F (or E)? Everything seems to compile OK (except the frequent "Warning: Unresolved:" at link time - this threw me off the scent for a while!), but then at run time I get: Fatal error: The X11 shared library could not be loaded. The error was dlopen: cannot load

On Fri, April 17, 2015 12:50 am, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 17/04/15 12:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> But being not native >> English speaker, I use it ("not native English speaker") > Figured as much, which is why I mentioned it ;) > >> as an excuse for >> being unable to pronounce anything. > Not as if most English speakers can pronounce many English

Maybe this is a faq. but how? I pronounce it as "ZEN". in Japanese, it is same pronounce as "zen", a kind of Taoism. --- Okajima. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from

Can someone enlighten me on what the status is of aspect ratio in theora is ? The ti structure has aspect_num and _den values, which I assume give the intended display aspect ratio (e.g. 4/3). The sample files on the bittorrent seem to say both values are 0 for all files. I'd think it should at least be made impossible to have a 0 as the denominator. The library doesn't check the

If we need to name the llvm mascot, how about lleweelyn.... or perhaps even better, LLeVeelyM Nick On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Albert Graef<Dr.Graef at t-online.de> wrote: > m awful at this kind of stuff, but maybe someone could do a small > version of this with "LLVM Inside" or some such phrase on it, to be used > on websites of compilers using LLVM as their

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > MUCH more FOSS oriented I've been taking an informal survey on this for awhile now. I know the new, official acronym is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). But even before that acronym was popular, I had long argued that Stallman's insistence on calling it "Free Software" when that could be confused with

On 12/06/07, Luke Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote: > > On Jun 11, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Thijs Oppermann wrote: > > > But they don''t always work. For example, in the example (a bit > > like) above (which was what I had in my git module definition for > > clientsetup): > > > > file { "/home/${user}/.netrc.d": > > ensure

> Ubuntu and Knoppix can say they use Debian sources ... SLAX can say it > uses Slackware sources. Those guys have trademarks too. Debian and Slackware don't sell "enterprise" products. And many such projects are non-profit or otherwise. Unless Debian plans to establish itself as a commercial player, they don't need to defend their trademark. In fact, the commercial

HEllo, i am running samba 3.0.14a with this smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = redhat workgroup = net2day server string = PDC [on Redhat :: Samba server %v] security = user encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/24 127.0.0.1 interfaces = lo eth0 bind interfaces only = yes local master = yes os level = 65 domain master = yes

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > IBM has since totally changed their thoughts with regards to GNU/Linux. Actually, their cut-off of Monterey had everything to do with their current change in strategy on Linux back in 2000+. Monterey was established before IBM's interest in GNU/Linux. After IBM realized that it could use an economical complement in Linux, it saw

From: Collins Richey > Sounds pretty religious-based to me. > IBM=bad > HP,Sun, RedHat, SCO=good. > OTOH, from some of your comments, Novell=better. Are you really that shallow? IBM is our partner, not our friend. Sun has its interests too, and has 5 different entities of focus, which vary. Red Hat is a tale of two companies, cut-throat business combined with GPL-analness (like

As far as I know, btrfs comes from "btree file system", but why does btrfs pronounce "butter-eff-ess"? -- Wang Shaoyan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

I''m noticing some weirdness in my ulog files with version 2.0.10. Here is a portion of the log: Jan 7 11:01:37 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:0a:95:b2:11:4c:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.100 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=97 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=44155 CE PROTO=UDP SPT=631 DPT=631 LEN=77 Jan 7 11:01:39 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT=

From: Martyn Drake <martyn at drake.org.uk> > To be quite honest with you - that's been and gone so quickly I can't > ever remember what my position was at that time. It actually happened over the span of 2 years before any name change. With the introduction of RHEL as a separate product, RHL was having an identity crisis. It used to be that ".2" was the

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just