similar to: IAX users

Hey list, I have a problem when I host 2 SIP-accounts on the same Asterisk-server. Asterisk picks out the SIP-account on alphabetic order A --> Z. In my sip.conf : register => user1:passwd1 at server/user1 register => user2:passwd2 at server/user2 [YOCAN-3starsnet] type=peer host=server username=user1 secret=passwd1 fromuser=user1 accountcode=user1_in [ITCENTER-3starsnet] type=peer

Hi, I have a Samba 3 server which authenticate in AD. Is it possible to map windows usergroups against UNIX ones? In the logs, I see several SIDs whenever an user authenticate itself, but I don't know how to use them. For example, here is my [global] [global] dos charset = iso-8859-1 unix charset = iso-8859-1 workgroup = INFELEC realm = REALM.LOCAL

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6151 Summary: --safe-links can be fooled by adding extra slashes to the path Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi, My installation at home use two NAT translations before it reaches the linux box where Asterisk is running on. I use DSL with a Wireless router which fwd all packets to an Windows 2003 box an this windows box it NATing the UDP and RTC packets to my linux box. If I try to connect to it from outside I get this error : Nov 30 22:19:02 WARNING[1106250672]: chan_sip.c:673 retrans_pkt: Maximum

Hi, Where can I find a complete * manager api guide, the one one wiki is missing informations like the monitor function for example, Thnx Serge

Hi, What can it be when I can establish a connection between two Softphones but no voice is transfered ? thnx Hugo,

Hi! I use protocol manager on a boot diskete to map a network drive share which is shared by a samba server. (i.e net use i: \\server\d) I give a username and a password which exists in /etc/samba/smbpasswd (i.e user name: user1 and password: passwd1) but when I create and/or edit a file, it changes the ownership to that file to owner user: dobody and group owner: nobody. Also the rights are

What platform should you suggest to use asterisk ? I tried with SUSE now all the time but there are too many problems with the updates. On is the development platform on which * is developed ? Regards, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050611/1672c2ad/attachment.htm

Hello, I'm trying to backup partition "/users1" on host "john" onto partition "backup1" on host "mary". Here is my rsyncd.conf: [backup1] path = /backup1 use chroot uid root gid root auth users = backup secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets strict modes = true hosts allow = 193.136.196.9 hosts deny = * It works with ssh as

Following the recommendation of Prof. Ripley, I have created the Makevars file with the line: PKG_LIBS="-L/usr/lib/libm -lm -L/usr/local/lib/libgsl -lgsl -L/usr/local/lib /libgslcblas -lgslcblas" in the working directory. Now I have the code file Example3.c which computes the Bessel function value (the example is taken from the GSL reference book). I am running: R CMD SHLIB Example3.c

Running 'make check' I get two errors: running code in 'mva-Ex.R' .../usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: meet_ (code) from /users1/kleiweg/R-1.6.0-source/library/cluster/libs/cluster.sl running code in 'tcltk-Ex.R' .../usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: Tcl_EvalObjv (code) from /users1/kleiweg/R-1.6.0-source/library/tcltk/libs/tcltk.sl Version: platform =

The last line gets duplicated when a file is read like this: a <- scan(file=filename, what="", sep="\n", strip.white=c(TRUE), quiet=TRUE) (This error does not occur on Linux, the only other platform I tested.) Version: platform = hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 arch = hppa2.0 os = hpux10.20 system = hppa2.0, hpux10.20 Actually, all binaries are

Hello everybody! I am a Linux admin trying to move my mail system based on qmail to the software which is more spam-protected: exim4 + dovecot-1.0rc15 + pgsql . I've downloaded and rebuild dovecot from src.rpm (for fc4). During the testing stage I've discovered two troubles: 1) the problem with deliver (...I'm not sure it's a really bug). Here is relevant part of my

hi all, i have a Samba version 3.2.5 server running in a debian 5.0.8 (a little old, i know...). the network setup is: -one local office using samba -one remote office (we call it cberg) using samba remotely over a vpn (linksys-cisco) -another remote office (we call it colon) using samba remotely over a vpn (linksys-cisco) the local office and colon office are working fine the remote office

I'm wondering why the lit tests didn't catch this as part of testing rc1 on ARM. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > XRay is tested automatically on build-bots with tests in LLVM and > compiler-rt . Or are you asking for manual testing instructions? > Of these 2 patches, the compiler-rt patch depends on LLVM patch because

How is XRay tested? IIRC, Renato didn't see any test failures on ARM? Merging sounds reasonbaly, I'd just like to understand what's the risk for the branch. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hans, these changes reached trunk in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292516 and > https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292517 . Could you look?

I see. Thanks for clarifying. I'm Ok with merging these if Dean agrees, as I believe he's the code owner. Thanks, Hans On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > There were no LLVM tests for presence of XRay instrumentation map in the > emitted assembly. You can see that https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624 adds this > check to the

Sorry, I initially included LLVM-Commits rather than LLVM-Dev. Fixed. On 26 January 2017 at 03:26, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dean, Renato, > > AFAIK, unfortunately, these critical Arm32 XRay fixes are not yet in 4.0: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624 , https://reviews.llvm.org/D28623 . The > first repairs XRay instrumentation map emission.

Begin forwarded message: > From: Serge Noiraud <Serge.Noiraud at free.fr> > Date: 27 January 2008 21:17:28 GMT > To: steve at asklater.com > Subject: Mapstraction mailing list and licensing. > > Hi, > Reading the mapstraction home page, You speek about mapstraction > mailing list. > All the pointers go on the openstreetmap mailing lists and I saw the >

Hi all ! Is anyone using xen kernel + drbd 8.2.4 ? I don''t know exactly if my problems come from the addition of the two packages, or from drbd 8.2.4, but I encoutered kernel panic 2 times when trying to do first sync of drbd resources :s Cheers, -- Serge Dewailly _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com