What platform should you suggest to use asterisk ? I tried with SUSE now all the time but there are too many problems with the updates. On is the development platform on which * is developed ? Regards, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050611/1672c2ad/attachment.htm
On 13:22, Sat 11 Jun 05, Serge Schumacher wrote:> What platform should you suggest to use asterisk ? > > I tried with SUSE now all the time but there are too many problems with > the updates. > > On is the development platform on which * is developed ? > > Regards, >I love the way the Debian updates work. And the Debian asterisk package includes the bristuffed patches. I also run it on OpenBSD, but if you need zaptel drivers OpenBSD is not the way to go. -- Michiel van Baak http://michiel.vanbaak.info michiel@vanbaak.info GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E0B9A2D "Two of the most famous products of Berkeley are LSD and BSD. I don't think that this is a coincidence."
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:03:59PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:> On 13:22, Sat 11 Jun 05, Serge Schumacher wrote: > > What platform should you suggest to use asterisk ? > > I love the way the Debian updates work.Me too, but has the installation improved with the latest Sarge release? The announcement claims there are improvements. Debian has been extremely slow to improve it installer. I used CentOS 3.4 on two recent Asterisk installs with no problems. -- Mike
Mike M wrote:>On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:03:59PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote: > > >>On 13:22, Sat 11 Jun 05, Serge Schumacher wrote: >> >> >>>What platform should you suggest to use asterisk ? >>> >>> >>I love the way the Debian updates work. >> >> > >Me too, but has the installation improved with the latest Sarge release? >The announcement claims there are improvements. Debian has been >extremely slow to improve it installer. > >I used CentOS 3.4 on two recent Asterisk installs with no problems. > >I have used debian since 1997. There have been great improvements to the installer. My usage has been primarily server(as opposed to workstation). However, I also use it for my workstation needs. When I need access to windows I use the linux remote desktop client to login to remote win systems I have access to. I am composing this on a p2-450 with 128mb connected via dialup. It runs debian sarge. The mail client is mozilla thunderbird. I am using imap to access the mail folders on a debian sarge machine at my network ops. It took me about 2 hours to throw these parts together and install the software I needed.
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 15:15 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:> > On 06/11/05 20:52 trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com said the following: > > linux distributions, freebsd 4.x it wont build, 5.x it will (havent > > checked if it supports any of the FXO/FXS cards since that isnt a > > it does build and run well on freebsd 4.x and 5.x, with drivers available > for the FXO/FXS cards as well as the TE405/TE410 E1 cards. >ports doesnt like it. How did you build it on 4.x? and which 4.x specifically? -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050612/7d8ce57d/attachment.pgp