similar to: Debian Sarge -- cvs vs. apt-get

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > I was wondering though what happens if we have an alias, which may or may > > not be weak itself, to a non-odr weak symbol that isn't prevailing. In > that > > case, do we eventually

> On Jan 18, 2017, at 7:11 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jan 14, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Mehdi

Thanks, David and Peter. Some responses to Peter's email below. Teresa On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Teresa, > > I think that to answer your question correctly it is helpful to consider > what is going on at the object file level. For your test1.c we conceptually > have a .text section containing the body of f, and

> On Jan 14, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe we should get it right (and simpler) if (when…) we move to the representation we discussed last spring:

Hi, I believe we should get it right (and simpler) if (when…) we move to the representation we discussed last spring: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27866 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27866> Our conclusion was that we should always have alias pointing to private anonymous and nothing else, so when we currently have: @a = global i32 0 @b = alias @a It should always

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2017-04-25 12:11 GMT-07:00 Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk>: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've been making a number of changes to the summary representation >> recently, and I wanted to lay out some of my plans so that folks are aware >> of my ultimate

Hi Mehdi, Peter and David (and anyone else who sees this), I've been playing with some examples to handle the weak symbol cases we discussed in IRC earlier this week in the context of D28523. I was going to implement the support for turning aliases into copies in order to enable performing thinLTOResolveWeakForLinkerGUID on both aliases and aliasees, as a first step to being able to drop

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The rule should be that the alias to aliasee link is never broken. The > >> reason being that an alias at the file level is just another symbol with > >> the same value. > >> > >> So if foo is an alias to bar, accessing that foo will always be

Hi, I recompiled asterisk today from CVS and I've been having a number of problems, I've read the deadlock page on the wiki and some of it sounds like that, however, the latest issue we're having it that sometimes Asterisk doesn't seem to know the PRI channel has dropped, and assumes it's still busy. However, that same channel can be used to make an outgoing call?! Has

The problem is that ThinLTO is not dropping the non-prevailing definitions, and they end up being emitted into the object file for b.o. $ ../ra/bin/llvm-dis -o - b.o0.0.preopt.bc | grep __llvm_prof $__llvm_profile_raw_version = comdat any $__llvm_profile_filename = comdat any @__llvm_profile_raw_version = constant i64 72057594037927940, comdat @__llvm_profile_filename = constant [19 x i8]

Thanks Peter, your patch does fix the reproducer. I filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37422 to track this bug. I have no clue on how to resolve the tests - whether further cleanup is required in the code or in the tests. But if Teresa or you cannot get to it, I can, with some help, take a crack at fixing the tests. On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:26 AM Peter Collingbourne <peter at

Hello everyone, I'm using a TE410P, no irq sharing, and all extraneous devices disabled, such as USB, Parallel etc. I'm getting a few IRQ misses according to ZTTOOL. We're running a standard PRI_CPE interface and seem to be getting dropped calls, and errors on the D-CHANNEL occasionally. The circuit itself is very solid, it was in use on our old PBX just a few weeks ago, never

Hi all, I've been making a number of changes to the summary representation recently, and I wanted to lay out some of my plans so that folks are aware of my ultimate direction with this. Basically I want to move the summary into the irsymtab that we will be storing to disk after D32061 lands. This would help solve a number of problems: - To read a summary, you need to read all summaries in a

I've compiled Asterisk on Redhat 9 and Fedora Core 1 in the past, generally without any problems. Especially w/ the stock kernel, which I generally loathe. When I tried to upgrade my Redhat 9 Server to the 2.4.27 kernel, doing a manual/clean compile, I had massive quality issues. I was forced to go back down to a stock 2.4.24 kernel. Never figured out why. Now, I've installed Gentoo

David, Following on from Jim Lemon's suggest that polar plots might be more what you need, there are both wind rose and polar plot functions in the openair package that might be of use (particularly windRose and polarFreq). They will not do everthing you are after without some careful conditioning or extra work with latticeExtra, but could get you some of the way there. Karl Ropkins,

I've been digging into COMDAT with regular LTO, specifically in the context of the LLVM gold plugin. The GCC WHOPR documentation specifies that the linker will resolve all COMDAT groups to the IR-provided definitions, if available. Additionally it specifies that "When the WPA phase produces the definition of the COMDAT symbol in a new object file, that definition should not be in a COMDAT

All, I''ve heard recently about has_many :through as a necessary alternative to HABTM (when the join table has it''s own id column, say, in a legacy schema). However, is the prevailing Rails wisdom now that one should use has_many :through in _all_ cases? If so, why? Thanks, Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Anyone out there have a call center running with Asterisk? We run a small helpdesk and need some basic ICD functionality ... agent ready/not ready, call queueing, etc. There doesn't seem to be too much out there in the way of open source, so we're also looking for commercial solutions that will work with Asterisk. Any ideas? Thanks, Mike Roberts -------------- next part --------------

Not too different from their corresponding last releases, but documentation has been filled in for both. To upgrade: gem install camping --source code.whytheluckystiff.net And, here is a complete changelog: == Camping 1.5 * Camping::Apps stores an array of classes for all loaded apps. * bin/camping can be given a directory. Like: <tt>camping examples/</tt> * Console mode -- thank

Hi List, I am trying to create a spatial representation of some wind data. I have the season, frequency, strength and direction of the wind from 10 different locations, the coverage of the area that I am interested in is not 100% there are small gaps in my coverage due to the location of the weather stations. I am trying to create a series of wind maps e.g. the Prevailing Winds, the maximum