similar to: CND (CID) woe on a TDM400P

Hi all: I get the following error message that I am not able to resolve. Error in if (const(t, min(1e-08, mean(t)/1e+06))) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed It appears right before the last data.frame statement. Below is the program that simulates data from one way random effects model and then computes normality and bootstrap confidence interval for

Is it possible to display the incoming calling number on a handset when trying to pick up a call from another handset? I currently have Call Pickup working using *8, I have also used the PickUp application successfully but I'm not sure how to use these features so the handsets show the incoming calling number and not the number that you have dialled to pick up the call. Regards David

I have a vector of land cover class data from a GIS: > landcov[1:10,2] #the first ten examples of a large (100k+) object 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 12 01 12 01 15 15 15 15 15 etc. I also have a lookup table for the class data that gives the cover type as a string: > cnd.names #the look up table, i.e., landcov[3,2] == 1 == "Montane Meadow" CndVal

On 01/27/2015 09:38 PM, Sanjoy Das wrote: >> if the definition of NUW is that zext-ing the result is equivalent to >> zext-ing the inputs and doing the operation at a higher bitwidth (my >> understanding), then %m and %n cannot hold those values, that would violate >> the NUW flag. > The problem to solve is adequately defining "cannot hold". In the >

> I don't think your example is actually problematic. The original program > before your transformation *executed* undefined behavior in the form of '%x > = add nuw i32 %m, %n' with "%m = %n = 2^32-1 (a.k.a INT_MAX)". If I I was trying to show why the rule "signed overflow is undefined behavior" is problematic w.r.t. hoisting arithmetic by repeating an

Hi All, I need to implement select_cc as a "cmp; mov rX,1; brcond cnd, END; mov rX,0; END:" sequence. Chris mentioned that the PPC code (as well as the x86 SSE code) does this, but I can't seem to find it. What I really need to kmow is how to insert the branch/label pair at instruction selection phase. Anyone have an example of this?

On 01/28/2015 11:29 PM, Sanjoy Das wrote: >> I don't think your example is actually problematic. The original program >> before your transformation *executed* undefined behavior in the form of '%x >> = add nuw i32 %m, %n' with "%m = %n = 2^32-1 (a.k.a INT_MAX)". If I > I was trying to show why the rule "signed overflow is undefined >

Hey Guys, I'm curious if there's an interest in a free, CallerID database? For those of you in the same spot we are, our current provider only provides us with the CND, excluding CNAM. Would creating a public database, managed by users be worthwhile to anyone? Thanks - Any input is greatly appreciated. -- Robert Norton SophMedia LLC Operations Manager Cell: 480-234-4312 Office:

someguy wrote: > Hi All, > > I need to implement select_cc as a "cmp; mov rX,1; brcond cnd, END; > mov rX,0; END:" sequence. > > Chris mentioned that the PPC code (as well as the x86 SSE code) does > this, but I can't seem to find it. > > What I really need to kmow is how to insert the branch/label pair at > instruction selection phase. > > Anyone

Hi folks, Don't know if it could be interesting or not, even useful, but past days i was spending my time trying to use an old gsm motorola v150 mobile phone to get access to my host from my palm device with pssh (http://www.sealiesoftware.com/pssh/), these are the steps i did to accomplish it, feel free to suggest or improve it, anyway i found it usefull. First, this motorolla has an usb

I have a done google seaches on convertion and so far they all failed. Rich adamson and wheely-bin.co.uk Here is what I have Laptop running solarwinds tftp with the following files OS79XX.txt <- POS30201 SIP<phonemac>.cnf.xml RINGLIST.DAT <-Ringer1.pcm Ringer1.pcm The phone (7940) is hardcoded to the TFTP ip of the laptop and has a hardcoded ip is was on firmware version:

Has anyone gotten CID from Bell Canada to work properly with *? We have our * box down at our datacentre in St Louis, and whenever we call it from a Bell Canada Telephone line, all we see is '' for the CID. I did some digging on google and the mailing lists and couldn't find anything pertaining directly to Bell-Canada and * CID, but didn't find much. I did however find :

Dear Lister, I am facing a strange problem fitting a GLM of the negative binomial family. Actually, I tried to estimate theta (the scale parameter) through glm.nb from MASS and could get convergence only relaxing the convergence tolerance to 1e-3. With warning messages: glm1<-glm.nb(nbcas~.,data=zonesdb4,control=glm.control(epsilon = 1e-3)) There were 25 warnings (use warnings() to see

On Jul 11, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > We are looking for an open source C++ parser other than g++ if > possible. Clang would be great but its C++ support is still some > way away and we need something that works or nearly works now. Does > anyone have any experience with ANTLR for parsing C++ and for > extending their C++ parser? Any other feedback on

Good day everyone, Can anyone suggest an effective method to solve the following problem: I have 2 dataframes D1 and D2 as follows: D1: dates ws wc pwc 2005-10-19:12:00 10.8 80 81 2005-10-20:12:00 12.3 5 15 2005-10-21:15:00 12.3 3 15 2005-10-22:15:00 11.3 13 95 2005-10-23:12:00 12.3 13 2 2005-10-24:15:00 10.3 2 95 2005-10-25:15:00 10.3 2 2 D2:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- $Id: lpr-vulnerability-0.6-linux,v 1.1 1996/11/22 21:42:46 alex Exp $ Linux Security FAQ Update lpr Vulnerability Thu Nov 21 22:24:12 EST 1996 Copyright (C) 1995,1996 Alexander O. Yuriev (alex@bach.cis.temple.edu) CIS Laboratories

Hi Johannes, > From the Lang-Ref statement > > "With the inbounds keyword, the result value of the GEP is undefined > if the address is outside the actual underlying allocated object and > not the address one-past-the-end." > > I'd argue that the actual offset value (here 0) is irrelevant. The GEP > value is undefined if inbounds is present and the

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Ah, yes. You are right, we cannot always assume that %y would be zero in > > the second case. > > This wouldn't be the first time we've lost information that we could use > to > > optimize a program by transforming it. > > > > Do you think this result

The Wine development release 1.6-rc4 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Bug fixes only, we are in code freeze. The source is available from the following locations: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wine/wine-1.6-rc4.tar.bz2 http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/wine/source/1.6/wine-1.6-rc4.tar.bz2 Binary packages for various distributions will be available

Hi Johannes, >> So, the thinking here is: LLVM cannot exclude the possibility of an >> object of size 0 existing at any given address. The pointer returned >> by "GEPi p 0" then would be one-past-the-end of such a 0-sized object. >> Thus, "GEPi p 0" is the identitiy function for any p, it will not >> return poison. > > I don't see the