similar to: Multiple phonenumbers on one E1 PRI with Digium TE410P ?

Hi, I've got a relatively simple tinc setup. I've got two "servers" that are on the public internet that act as routers for three "clients" that are behind NATs. Those servers are called aaaaa and bbbbb the clients are xxxxx, yyyyy and zzzzz Unfortunatly the servers have problems accepting a connection from the clients syslog on aaaaa: Sep 29 18:28:58 schuerrer

Dear friends, How do I stop partial matching of list names? e.g., x <- list(AAAA="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") is.null(x$A) #returns FALSE even though there is no element A. if(is.null(x$A)) {result <- x$BBBB} else {result <- x$A} result #is aaaa even though there is no x$A element x <- list(CCCC="aaaaa", BBBBB="bbbbb") if(is.null(x$A))

Hi All, I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is correct as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for domain bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a Connect:bbbbb.co.uk RELAY statement into /etc/mail/access and restart sendmail Obviously I have the DNS MX records for the domain are

Thanks Rowland - appreciated. I have checked the ldbsearch result and both groups look to be pretty much exactly the same to me, one of them is shown below (I have sanitised some of the output, replacing parts with 123/a/b/c, but the rest of the output is byte for byte as seen) In the time between posting my original message and checking again just now, however, I have the following additional

Hi, I am sure I have come across this before but have previously either ignored it or somehow worked around it. However it has come up again and this time I will try to find out what's going on, hopefully we can fix whatever the issue is. I have a Samba 4.2.2 domain that generally works fine; I have rfc2307 enabled so that I can keep UIDs/GIDs consistent across machines whilst still being

Hi all, I am using RStudio. I wanted to copy and past an expression/line. I highlighted it, and then copied and pasted: The result was not the line that I wanted, instead, it was the line above... For example: I have three lines: aaaaa bbbbb ccccc .... I highlighted "bbbbb" and copied, but the pasted outcome was "aaaaa"... What happened? Thanks al ot! [[alternative

Hi Is there any function to do bitwise or/and/xor on long bit vectors? "aaaaa" "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000......................" "bbbbb" "0000000000000000000000000000001000000000000100000000100000001100......................" "ccccc"

Hi, In the Sweave output for summary for several types of model objects and also for the comparison of models with anova, I find that that the display of the call(s) or formula does not obey the width option, even with keep.source=TRUE set, so that a long formula will overshoot the margins in the document. I would like to know if there is a good way to correct that. Looking at the print.summary

A newer version of the patch. Replaces the previous (ie. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-February/004553.html) version. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: no_slow_intrin_v2.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2959 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Hello, Here is the logic that I am trying to achieve. I have a User Model and the business rule is that user can accept maximum 5 friends requests. for this I have an accept method in User Model which looks similar to below code snippet def accept(friend) raise ArgumentError if self.friends.count >= MAX_FRIENDS_ALLOWED ... ... #code to add friend to friends list end As you

My telco used cat5 as well for the demarc to CPE. It's also with noting that many channel banks, such as my Atlas, and zapata.conf itself also have parameters to allow you to tune the gains to compensate for cable signal loss. I've never had to touch them, and my CPE is about 300 feet from the PRI demarc (with an ordinary Cat5 cable connecting them)

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 12:14 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users] > whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to

I was once told by a lineman that the cables they use didn't have that many twists in them because it wasn't needed, and that the extra twists would effectively use more cable and thus cost and weigh more than triple what they do now. He told me that with the number of twists in the Cat 5 cable it would cancel out any interference, but he also stated that the effective length was

Hi everybody I've just installed a new Redhat 8.0 and configured it with Asterisk, zaptel and libpri. Afterwards I installed a TE410P and configured this as well. But when starting Asterisk I get the following error message: ------------------------------------------------------- -- Registered channel 1, PRI Signalling signalling ..... -- Registered channel 15, PRI Signalling

I tend to use the soft sell. Looks like I Just self-promoted :-) -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Novack Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 12:05 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users]

I have used cross-connect wire from the spool to make T1 crossover cables with RJ45 ends. All that matters is that pin one goes to four and two goes to five on both ends. ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Andrew Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:51 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1

hi, I'm trying to configure my newly acquired TE410P card to work as 4 E1 spans. This is supposed to be a drop-in replacement to the earlier E100P card. However, on loading the zaptel module it gets configured as T1 spans basically doing a 'cat' on /proc/zaptel/1 thru 4, it shows 24 channels per span. After this ztcfg fails saying 'ZT_CHANCONFIG failed for channel 97'.

Hi, I'm trying to connect a PC with a TE410P to an E1/IP equipment. Unfortunately I keep getting a yellow alarm from zaptel (in zttool) and a Loss of Framing alarm on the remote equipment. The E1/IP is connected on the other side to a PRI interface on a GSM MSC. I have configured the span as: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 (also tried span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3) and the channels as: bchan=1-15,17-31

I for one think it is a great idea to buy a book with hard earned money and wait a few days to a week just to get an answer to a question that is freely available on the internet immediately. Hard pressed to think of anything in the "book" that is not on with wiki with more up to date and useful information. -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Lopez

I agree. I haven't had a problem using CAT-5, even for long runs, however it's not a real T-Carrier cable and I didn't know how old the PBX is. Paul >I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality >Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you >should be fine. As far as the shielding goes, I use UTP cables and >Connectors