similar to: Getting Started with Digium T100/E100 cards

Hello all, Please forgive me if this sounds a little (or a lot) ignorant as I am very new to asterisk. Right now I have two pc's connected back to back through an E100 card running asterisk. I have openh323 running as well and I am able to route calls through the E1 line. Next up I would like to be able to register asterisk with a gatekeeper. On another computer is running openGK. Using

Dear Telcotype Braniacs, I have tried doing a google search to find out what this switch looks like, what the physical interface is, but havn't been successful. I am quite new to the ISDN world so I'm not sure what to expect when I see this switch. Does anyone have any experience connecting to this switch? The following is basically all I have been given for info: 1) Ericsson, AXT121,

Is anyone using the subject phone without the proprietary call setup equipment? How do you configure this phone to use the * pbx? I am hoping to go out and buy a couple of phones but the dealer here says I need to spend another $15K or so for the call manager equipment. Regards, Sean Langley, P.Eng Firmware Engineer General Dynamics Canada (403)730-1482 sean.langley@gdcanada.com

Use oh323. Download the openh323 and pwlib tarballs from openh323.org Follow Jeremy's instructions in the /asterisk/channels/h323/ directory EXACTLY! good luck Regards, Sean Langley, P.Eng Firmware Engineer General Dynamics Canada (403)730-1482 sean.langley@gdcanada.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:senad@cwcom.net] > Sent: Friday, September 12,

I just added 2 Digium T100 cards. When my * box boots, it found them and configured them. When I enter genzaptelconf, it comes back with the following error: line 13: Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl' Unloading zaptel hardware drivers: Removing zaptel module: rmmod: module zaptel is not loaded [FAILED] Loading zaptel

Hi All I am getting a strange prblem while installing TE420 on a Dell Poweredge T100 machine. I get a "TE4XXX: version Synchronisation error " nad the machine hangs which needs a hard reboot . Its a new machine and if i install TE410P then installation is successful. Strangely enough i have a working TE420F on another Dell POweredge T100 machine at a different locaiton ... The DELL tech

Hello all- So I have * up and running and connected to a legacy system via em_w lines and have no trouble dialing from * through the tie line but from the PBX across the tie line I am having intermittant receipt of the DTMF. T-Berd testing is showing that the digits are coming across but * is either missing the first digit consistantly. This seems to me to have something to do with start timers

Hello, I am not entirely sure the subject line captures what I am trying to do, but hopefully this description of the problem will help folks to see my challenge and hopefully offer constructive assistance. I have an experimental setup where I measure the decrease in oxygen in small vials as an organism, such as an oyster, consumes the oxygen. Each vial is calibrated before the experiment and

First time doing a t-1 config with *. running FC2 and CVS as of last W/E. i run modprobe wct1xxp and I get "Unable to open master device '/dev/zap/ctl' i look at /dev and there isn't even a zap directory. i was looking around and found something in /udev that looks promising but not sure what the deal is. ztcfg returns 24 channels configured but the same notice at the bottom

>From: "Shawn Wright" <swright@sls.bc.ca> >Subject: [Shorewall-users] Finally making some progress >I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive >performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, >along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the >problem *is* our firewall. We don''t

We are located in Belgium and just ordered a PRA line, the telco asked the following questions : - 120 or 75 ohm ? - Support for CRC4 yes/no ? - B channels in 2 way ? We will buy a digium card but which one should we buy ? could anybody help me with this ? Thank you Michael Sorry for the previous html mail DISCLAIMER: The content of this e-mail message does not constitute a commitment

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Langley, Robert <Robert.Langley at ventura.org > wrote: > As far as the peer status (and I now remember seeing this earlier) the > issue appears to be that the host name for gsaov07 is attempting to resolve > over the wrong network for gluster "ent...." and not "stor.local". > So, it may be as simple as removing gsaov07 as a

As far as the peer status (and I now remember seeing this earlier) the issue appears to be that the host name for gsaov07 is attempting to resolve over the wrong network for gluster "ent...." and not "stor.local". So, it may be as simple as removing gsaov07 as a peer, then probing over the correct network. I'll follow up with the Engine log. Sent using OWA for iPhone

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 at 17:40, Langley, Robert <Robert.Langley at ventura.org> wrote: > Thank you for your response. There has been no change of IP addresses. And > I have tried restarting the glusterd service multiple times. > I am using fully qualified names with a DNS server that has forward and > reverse setup. > Something I had noticed is that, with oVirt, communication

Could the problem be that the e100 can do IP receive checksumming on the board, but the eepro driver doesn't enable it. When the board is doing checksum offload, then the csum field isn't set. Please try disabling receive checksumming on the e100 driver modprobe e100 XsumRX=0 If this is the problem, it exists both 2.4 and 2.6. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:24:57 +0200 Hannes Schulz

I have the following in extentions.conf: exten => 2111,1,Dial(SIP/2111 at gw1.langley) exten => 2111,2,Voicemail(u2111) exten => 2111,3,Hangup exten => 2111,100,Voicemail(b2111) exten => 2111,101,Hangup I have the following in sip.conf: ; Cisco 1750 [gw1.langley] type=friend host=172.16.17.1 context=default canreinvite=no Like the ATA, lots of stuff doesn't work on the 1750

Thank you for your response. There has been no change of IP addresses. And I have tried restarting the glusterd service multiple times. I am using fully qualified names with a DNS server that has forward and reverse setup. Something I had noticed is that, with oVirt, communication is being attempted over the VM network, rather than storage network. Which is not how the bricks are defined. Not sure

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 at 17:40, Langley, Robert <Robert.Langley at ventura.org> > wrote: > >> Thank you for your response. There has been no change of IP addresses. >> And I have tried restarting the glusterd service multiple times. >> I am using fully qualified names with a

Hi, I have a data file which is named test.txt as below. Prior to that, I have converted the last row from nominal to numeric using as.integer. Statement T1001 T1002 T1003 T1004 T1005 T100 T1014 T1021 T1022 T1023 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0

glusterd failed to resolve addresses of the bricks. This could happen either because of glusterd was trying to resolve the address of the brick before the N/W interface was up or a change in the IP? If it's the latter then a point to note is that it's recommended that cluster should be formed using hostname otherwise if the server goes through IP change we have to change the configuration