Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding"
2003 Aug 26
2
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-08-27 02:56 -------
sshd already sets nodelay for the connection, but conditionally, and
only for interactive sessions, so this is the well known problem:
why does sshd traditionally set no delay only for interactive sessions.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
2003 Jun 04
1
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-06-04 19:54
2003 Dec 31
0
Problem with port forwarding on Mac OS X
I have found a problem with port forwarding on Mac OS X (10.2 and
10.3). When I forward
a port to localhost, as in
ssh -R 40404:localhost:40404 somehost
...and the remote system makes a connection on this port, I get the
message
getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Connection reset by peer
I have tracked this down to the loop in connect_to that gets a list of
addresses from
getaddrinfo and tries them
2006 Mar 12
3
[Bug 981] Flow stop in SSH2
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=981
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #811| |ok+
Flag| |
------- Comment #6 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-03-12 16:16 -------
(From update
2003 Oct 26
1
getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Socket operation on non-socket
We get the warning above whenever we use a ProxyCommand. We _know_ it's
a pipe, so we can't use sockopts on it. So we shouldn't bitch about it.
This breaks all kinds of things which use SSH transparently; including
pine, which really wants the first thing it receives from an IMAP server
to be a valid imap greeting... which $subject is not.
$ ssh -o "proxycommand sh -c '(
2003 May 06
0
OpenSSH Bug / Fix
To Whom It May Concern,
Our team has found what we believe to be a bug in the code for SSHD. When
creating an SSH port forward between a Linux machine (server) and a machine running
Cygwin (client), we were getting buffering of data coming from the server. This buffering
caused small ammounts of data to be bursted, instead of sent immediately. Also, since
debug output showed that
2000 Oct 07
2
[PATCH]: Add tcp_wrappers protection to port forwarding
Hi,
attached is a patch by Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus.com> relative to
2.2.0p1.
Description:
OpenSSH does not allow port gatewaying by default. This means that only
the local host can access forwarded ports. Adding "GatewayPorts yes" to
.ssh/config usually does this job.
Unfortunately, OpenSSH does not recognize the same hosts.allow/
hosts.deny options as ssh.com's sshd
2006 Mar 13
1
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set for non-interactive sessions
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
dtucker at zip.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #294 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Comment #10 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-03-13 19:25 -------
Created
2003 May 09
2
TCP_NODELAY always set, now?
I know that there was a discussion on this about a year back, and
there is a bug 556 this week that mentions TCP_NODELAY.
However, when I use ssh through a pipe (e.g., to tunnel through an
HTTP proxy using CONNECT) I see:
getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Socket operation on non-socket
How do I tell which end is generating this (I'm assuming the local
side, which is running through the pipe).
Also,
2003 May 10
1
OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 getsockopt TCP_NODELAY bogus message on Solaris 8
I ran into the following problem the first time I used
OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 on Solaris 8 (sparc, 32-bit):
$ ssh kiwi
Enter passphrase for RSA key '/net/sic/export/ford/home/eggert/.ssh/identity':
getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Socket operation on non-socket
Last login: Sat May 10 14:27:01 2003 from ip-66-80-53-59.d
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.8 Generic Patch October 2001
2001 Aug 24
2
[PATCH] SO_KEEPALIVE for port forwards
Attached is a patch to allow a user to turn on TCP keepalives for port
forwarded connections. It's mainly useful when the connections to the
ssh listener are coming from many different boxes, some of which
crash, leaving the service on the other side of the port forwarder
waiting on connections indefinitely.
It creates a new option named "KeepAliveForward" to control this
behavior.
2005 Apr 12
7
Samba question
1. Does anyone know what may be happening here? When I try to map a
drive from a PC, I get the following error: "The account is not
authorized to log in from this station.". I can map the drive just fine
from my PC. Does anyone know what may be going on here? Any help would
be greatly appreciated.
2. Also, whenever I use SWAT, it takes a long time for the
information to be
2003 Apr 09
1
[Bug 541] packet_set_interactive typo
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541
Summary: packet_set_interactive typo
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: furrier at
2002 Oct 31
1
TCP_NODELAY in Cygwin port
Hello SSH developers,
I am sorry if this is not really a bug, and I am missing something, but I am running into an issue with port forwarding in SSH. I am using 3.4p1 of SSH on both sides.
I am running the ssh daemon on a Slackware Linux 8.0 machine, and the ssh client is running in Cywgin version 1.3.13. The ssh client is creating about 7 port forwards in a mix of local and remote forwarding
2001 Nov 27
1
[PATCH] tcp-wrappers support extended to x11 forwards
Hi!
Here is the patch to support tcp wrappers with x11-forwarded connections.
The patch is for openssh-3.0.1p1 but it works fine with 2.9.9p2 too.
I've understood that this will not be included in the official version
because it adds complexity (?!) to openssh.
Binding the forwarded port to localhost doesn't solve all problems. I've
understood that you should also implement
1999 Nov 20
1
openssh and DOS
It appears that openssh has inherited the dos attack that ssh is
susceptible to. This has been discussed on Bugtraq (see
http://securityportal.com/list-archive/bugtraq/1999/Sep/0124.html
for the thread). There does not appear to be an official for ssh.
Attached below is a simple, proof of concept, patch that adds a
MaxConnections to sshd_config that sets the maximum number of
simultaneous
2001 Feb 10
3
Protocol 2 remote forwarding patch
Hi all,
I'm very new in this list, as looking for codes to plug up the lack of
functionality of "Protocol 2 Remote Forwardig".
Fortunately, I could find it in MARC's archive. Mr. Jarno Huuskonen
posted the codes in Sept, last year, and I tried applying it to my
FreeBSD box environment.
I couldn't apply an original patch, of course, for incompatibility of
virsion. The
2013 Jul 03
5
[Bug 2124] New: TCP_NODELAY not set by sshd for non-interactive non-exec sessions
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2124
Bug ID: 2124
Summary: TCP_NODELAY not set by sshd for non-interactive
non-exec sessions
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
2000 Jun 27
1
openssh-2.1.1p1 on Irix6.2 report
I've had fairly good sucecss with the portable OpenSSH 2.1.1p1 on Irix
6.2. There's one major nit, and a few things that configure got
wrong. I'm kinda deep in real work at the moment, so I don't have
time to delve heavily, but since configure specifically asked for
feedback on this port, I'm obliging.
The biggest problem I've run into so far is in the builtin PRNG
2007 Apr 02
2
[Bug 556] --modprobe parameter of iptables does not work
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=556
------- Additional Comments From griffon26@kfk4ever.com 2007-04-02 21:48 MET -------
Created an attachment (id=291)
--> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=291&action=view)
Fix for ignoring of user-supplied modprobe
------- Additional Comments From griffon26@kfk4ever.com 2007-04-02 21:48 MET -------