similar to: OpenSSH on SunOS 4

I'm having a problem authenticating to Active Directory. I can join the machine to the domain, wbinfo -g/-u will list the groups and users and I can map a drive using: smbclient -k //s-lorentz.s-res.uva.nl/c\$ However when I try to get the linux machine to authenticate a user it doesn't work giving the error NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS (0xc000005e). Looking further in the logs it fails

Hello, I have tried to install openssh 2.9p2 on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 2.8 after compiling the openssl (both 0.9.6a and 0.9.6b) and openssh software with both gcc 2.95.3, Sun's Forte compiler, Sun's linker, etc. I have tried the zlib from Sun freeware and version 11.8.0 REV=2000.01.08.18.12 contained in the SUNWzlib package. Both openssh and openssl appear to make properly and all the

I've installed Sun's SUNWski package on Solaris 8 (32-bit) that provides a /dev/random interface. It appears to as cat'ing it gives me a bunch of well, random data. However, when I ran my configure, it gives me the WARNING.RND message to the effect that I'm using the built-in. I've seen allusions on this list to building openssl with to get random support, so I rebuilt it

maybe this is a silly question ;-) But why is it possible to login on a machine with a locked account (passwd -l ) via pubkey-authentication (authorized_keys) ? I use OpenSSH3.01p1on Solaris8 with PAM support so I thought this should not happen. If this is the normal behaviour and built in intentionally what would be the easiest way to lock an account without deleting the users authorized_keys ?

Here is a patch to add the missing scp -1 and -2 options to eliminate confusion for users familiar with the commercial version of SSH. This patch and others are maintained on the secure nfs (SNFS) web page: http://www.math.ualberta.ca/imaging/snfs/ -- John Bowman University of Alberta diff -ur openssh-3.0.2p1/scp.c openssh-3.0.2p1J2/scp.c --- openssh-3.0.2p1/scp.c Sun Oct 21 18:53:59 2001 +++

Dear Open SSH and TCP Wrappers Colleagues, We are trying to use open ssh 3.1p1 on SPARC platforms under Solaris 2.8 using gcc 2.95.2, in conjunction with tcp wrappers 7.6 (IPv6 version). The wrapping of open ssh is not too well documented but I think we have figured most of this out (hearty thanks to Wietse Venema, Jim Mintha & Niels Provos for their helpful email exchanges) -- but have one

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670 Summary: SunOS 4.1.2 libs do not contain strtoul, used in moduli.c Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo:

Hi, According to IETF draft draft-ietf-secsh-transport-14.txt, different ciphers(encryption), MAC and compression can be used for one direction say server-to-client and a completely different cipher, MAC and compression for the other direction client-to-server of the same connection. Is this supported today in OpenSSH, and if not, are there plans to support it in any future releases of the code?

OpenBSD tree is heading into a lock and this includes OpenSSH. So we are winding up for a 3.5 release. If we can get people to test the current snapshots and report any problems that would improve the odds that your platform won't be broke for 3.5. Issues I know off of right now. 1. I can't test NeXT. So I TRULY need someone in that community to test for me. Last I heard there was

OpenSSH 2.9p2 portable doesn't seem to like files >2GB. Is there an option for this, or a way to enable file transfers of files >2GB using scp or sftp? TIA -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin at coremetrics.com "It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it." Latin Proverb

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438 ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-11-19 05:46 ------- if the user logs in and types /path/to/sftp-server does he/she get an error? If rsh is impeeding running the command then it is a rsh issue and not a sftp issue. - Ben ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or

When doing a simple configure of OpenSSh 2.5.2p2 on a Sparc running RedHat 6.0 I get: ... updating cache ./config.cache creating ./config.status creating Makefile sed: file conftest.s1 line 1: Unknown command: ``^'' creating openbsd-compat/Makefile sed: file conftest.s1 line 1: Unknown command: ``^'' creating ssh_prng_cmds sed: file conftest.s1 line 1: Unknown command:

Hello *, i have some problems to compile/configure OpenSSH on SunOS 5.5.1 with AFS. See the attachment for the compile environment. The programs compile fine and token passing is without problems. Unfortunately it is not possible to login without a valid token (`Permission denied.'). There is following message in the syslog: Kerberos v4 TGT for ... unverifiable: Principal unknown

I have successfully compiled OpenSSH 3.1p1 for the following systems: Solaris 8 Solaris 7 Irix 6.5.14 Irix 6.5.4 SunOS 4.1.3_U1 Unfortunately, the new sshd is not working on any of the above systems with the exception of Solaris 7. (I then put the Solaris 7 executables on Solaris 8, and they worked there too.) This is the error I'm getting: $ /usr/etc/sshd -D -d -d -d debug3: Seeing PRNG

Hi, i am experiencing a problem with ssh 3.0.2.p1 running on Solaris 2.8. Everything works fine with local users (i.e. with local passwd and shadow entries). With LDAP authenticated users, i obtain: treno at tao[!] -> ssh -v Segmentation Fault (core dumped) The probem is the same with 2.x releases. Thank you, Roberto Bertucci

Greetings, I am rather new to OGG or streaming, so I like to ask some questions: First, clients: I have a sun ultra-sparc 5 running linux. What clients can I use? The xmms (that came with the redhat 6.2 installation) does not have the vorbis-pluging, and -I guess- the xmms-plugin that's on the vorbis-website is for intel-linux? Where could I get the source for the plugin and (if

I think someone posted this before, but I can't find it in the archives. I am using rsync to pull down source files to be compiled. The delete options are used to clear out any old files left over from previous. Normally this works. I've run into one case where it persistently fails. Within the directory created during compiling is a symlink to another directory, also created during

What risk exists in changing the check for the matching version of openssl so that the final letter part of the version (e.g. 0.9.6c vs. 0.9.6d) is ignored? Are there any security vulnerabilities in such a thing? What if ssh(d) is linked against an older _letter_ version such as 0.9.6c and now finds the library is 0.9.6d? Is there a security risk in that? Surely a major API change would not

Things consider problems with sftp software - sftp manually first time to accept the fingerprint and anytime software is updated on host. - no ascii mode only binary - no verbose or indication of bytes transfered (you would do an ls after sftp is done) - no mput or mget (this may be a show stopper) but could script could generate itself with all the filenames takes coding. Kenneth

I have removed ANDIrand from my Solaris8 system and installed patch 112438-01 which provides native /dev/random and /dev/urandom devices. Recompiled both openssl-0.9.6c and openssh-3.1p1, restarted sshd. Now I seem unable to use scp, and connections to the local sshd appear to be very slow. $ scp php-4.2.0.tar.gz user at remote:/WWWserv/src local at bastion's password: php-4.2.0.tar.gz