similar to: internal / external port mapping

I have installed on a VirtualBox vm the crossbow ISO Now I''m trying to create the network map described in the "getting started" pdf I have this situation: On global zone, I have the real NIC: e1000g0 with ip 10.0.2.15 (VirtualBox NAT this IP, I can get web access with it) I have created an etherstub (etherstub n?2) with 2 vnics (vnic5 and vnic6), I''ve plumbed

Howdy, I just finished reading through the Crossbow presentation: http://blogs.sun.com/sunay/resource/crossbow.pdf And have one question. If you create a virtual NIC with dladm: $ dladm create-vnic -d bge0 -m 0:1:2:3:4:5 -b 10000 1 Can you then add vnic1 directly to the zone? e.g.: zonecfg -z zone1 zonecfg:zone1> create zonecfg:zone1> set zonepath=/zones/zone1 zonecfg:zone1> add net

Howdy, I just installed the crossbow snapshot from opensolaris.org, and bumped into an issue when attempting to create a virtual nic: $ dladm create-vnic -i 192.168.1.101 -d ni0 2 dladm: VNIC creation failed: No such file or directory (unknown diagnostic) When I truss the process, it looks like it''s failing when attempting to open the vnic pseudo-device: 100878/1:

Hi All, >From the design documents, I see there is an option "DLADM_VNIC_OPT_NODUPCHECK" for checking if the vnic MAC is unique on the same physical NIC. I have a question here. Does crossbow check if the MAC address is unique on the same subnet? E.g, create a vnic on hostA with hostB''s MAC address. Thanks, Karol

So, just to play with vnics with 106, I have... e1000g2 plumb''d with 192.168.85.10 vnic0 is created on top of e1000g2 with 192.168.85.22 I snoop on e1000g2 to see the traffic. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it works. I stop the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it doesn''t work. I start the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and ping works. Is this a new feature with

Ok, I''m hoping this is a fairly trivial issue, and I''m missing something. I''m trying to use Solaris zones (Nevada Build 117) to act as a DMZ and a router, using exclusive IPs, VNICs (from Crossbow), and connecting to the internet (static IP from my ISP). I''ve got the DMZ working - that zone sees the internet, can do name lookups, ftp, telnet, ssh, etc etc etc.

On 03/25/09 12:30, James Carlson wrote: > Girish Moodalbail writes: > >> bash-3.2# dladm show-link >> LINK CLASS MTU STATE PROMISC OVER >> e1000g0 phys 1501 up off -- >> e1000g1 phys 1502 up on -- >> > > That (plus or minus some column alignment) seems

redirecting to crossbow-discuss... On 03/12/09 15:17, Andrew Gabriel wrote: > In snv_108, I''m playing with creating a vnic over an etherstub, and I > might not be doing it right, but the behaviour I''m seeing doesn''t look > right either. > > So this is what I did... > > # dladm create-etherstub estub0 > # dladm create-vnic -l estub0 vnic0 > #

Hi, I''m afraid I have some problems understanding how crossbow is supposed to work ;) On my machine (OpenSolaris, snv_111) I''m running VirtualBox with couple of linux / XP installation and additionally a zone with exclusive IP. My network configuration looks like this: [6]elsinore:~>dladm show-link LINK CLASS MTU STATE OVER bge0 phys 1500 up

FYI - I made a small but architecturally important change to the opensolaris overview at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/crossbow_overview.png The new figure better represents our current planned long-term architecture, which allows multiple rings to be assigned to services or protocols *through* a single VNIC, in this case VNIC1, instead of requiring separate VNICs per

On OpenSolaris 2009.06 I created a flow, half a dozen VNICs, and I set some properties, and everything was working, then I rebooted my system and everything disappeared from show-vnic, show-flow, and show-prop. When I tried to re-create the objects, dladm said they already existed. While I could not see the objects, I could delete them. Example: # dladm show-vnic # dladm create-vnic -l bge0

Hi, >From what I have read, the create-vnic feature in dladm is only available within the context of crossbow...? Specifically, what I am wondering is whether it is at all possible to successfully install crossbow on top of Sun''s "Standard/sunsolve supported" Solaris 10/08 rather than OpenSolaris, per. Se.... Is this at all feasible? Many thanks in advance.. Best

The ISP will only route packets to the dom0 mac address; they are fully automated and will not accept custom requests. They don''t even support solaris, I had to do the install using vmware to have solaris in native on this dedicated hosting. DOM0_IP is a public IP and ipv4 forwarding is enabled. DOMU_IP is a public IP on the DOM0 side in my /etc/default/inetinit I have: route add -host

Hi, Can you tell why my vnic built on top of an aggregation of 2 NICs of 1 Gbit/s doesn''t report a speed of 2 GBit/s ? [root at nazgul /]# dladm show-dev bge0 link: up speed: 1000Mb duplex: full bge1 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge2 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge3 link: down speed: 0Mb

I have a requirement in my current project to support multiple co-located zones on the same VLAN. Our current deployment OS is Solaris 10 Update 4. I''d like to use exclusive IP zones, but I gather the only way to currently have multiple exclusive zones with interfaces on the same VLAN is through the use of VNICs. From my initial look at S10u4, it seems VNIC support been not yet been

How do I create a vnic that represents the factory assigned MAC address of my physical nic? The bge device in my system (x2100) appears to support 4 MAC addresses. The driver reserves the first as the ''primary/default'' address and allows manipulation of the other three via the MAC_CAPAB_MULTIADDRESS interface. I''d like to use vnics on this system, as I have Xen guest

Following is a short description on assigning priorities to a link (via dladm). Flows will have a similar mechanism (via flowadm). thanks, -venu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The components associated with a link or flow, such as Soft Ring Sets, Soft Rings and squeues, have kernel threads processing inbound/outbound packets. The scheduler

I''m doing some testing about vlan and saw a problem. Here is my configuration: I have two X4200M2, which are connected back-to-back via e1000g1 interfaces. I created one VNIC (with same VLAN ID) on each of these two e1000g1 interface. After I configure IPs on both of these two VNICs, they''re not able to talk to each other:

Hi. Can a virtual switch have more than one physical NIC? Or, can a VNIC have more than one NIC? (this is the same question, I think)? emike

Hi the Crossbow team, I am testing my UV fastpath bits and I found several issues that need your suggestion: 1. dladm show-usage won''t work if UV fastpath is enabled. Since the link usage data are collected based on the statistics of the mac_client_impl_t, and UV fastpath skips the GLDv3 processing, that won''t be available. I don''t see a solution for this except