Hi all, I have a VPN setup but it only works once in a while. It seems my firewall (shorewall 3.0.8) is blocking protocol 47. Here is what I have: eth0: internet eth2: dmz - my pptp server My entry In the rules file: pptp/ACCEPT fw dmz:192.168.253.2 My pptp macro ############################################################################### #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL RATE USER/ # PORT PORT(S) DEST LIMIT GROUP PARAM - - tcp 1723 PARAM - - 47 - #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE What my log reports: warn.log:Nov 30 09:44:32 fw01 Shorewall:dmz2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.2.12 DST=81.233.229.117 LEN=65 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=49617 DF PROTO=47 Am I being thick and missing something obvious or could this be a bug of some sort? If a client launches the PPTP connection via his linux/windows box, the first time usually fails but the next is just fine. Any help is greatly appreciated until I move to IPSec... unless there is a better VPN than IPSec that works with wintendo. Regards, -Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Ed wrote:> Any help is greatly appreciated until I move to IPSec... unless there is a > better VPN than IPSec that works with wintendo.Do yourself a favour and move to openvpn. It will give you far less grief than pptp or ipsec. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
It handles the OSes I need so I''ll give it a go... looks promissing. Still, if anyone can help with my current problem until I migrate my users to OpenVPN ;) Thanks -Ed On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:54, Andrew Suffield wrote:> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Ed wrote: > > Any help is greatly appreciated until I move to IPSec... unless there is > > a better VPN than IPSec that works with wintendo. > > Do yourself a favour and move to openvpn. It will give you far less > grief than pptp or ipsec. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Hang on, why are you specifying ''protocol 47'' for your second line? Shouldn''t you be specifying TCP: ############################## ################################################# #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL RATE USER/ # PORT PORT(S) DEST LIMIT GROUP PARAM - - tcp - 1723 PARAM - - tcp 47 - #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE or something similar? I presume your VPN uses TCP inbound on port 1723, and outbound on port 47? Or both inbound or outbound? or something similar? Hope this helps, Jan On 30/11/06, Ed <lists@precognet.com> wrote:> > It handles the OSes I need so I''ll give it a go... looks promissing. > > Still, if anyone can help with my current problem until I migrate my users > to > OpenVPN ;) > > Thanks > -Ed > > On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:54, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Ed wrote: > > > Any help is greatly appreciated until I move to IPSec... unless there > is > > > a better VPN than IPSec that works with wintendo. > > > > Do yourself a favour and move to openvpn. It will give you far less > > grief than pptp or ipsec. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > > Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share > > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn > cash > > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > > Shorewall-users mailing list > > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users >------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> Hang on, why are you specifying ''protocol 47'' for your second line?IP protocol 47 is GRE, which doesn''t look so wrong.> Shouldn''t you be specifying TCP: > > ############################## > ################################################# > #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL RATE > USER/ > # PORT PORT(S) DEST LIMIT > GROUP > PARAM - - tcp - 1723 > PARAM - - tcp 47 - > #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE > > or something similar? > > I presume your VPN uses TCP inbound on port 1723, and outbound on port 47? > Or both inbound or outbound? or something similar? > > Hope this helps, > > Jan > > > > On 30/11/06, Ed <lists@precognet.com> wrote: >> >> It handles the OSes I need so I''ll give it a go... looks promissing. >> >> Still, if anyone can help with my current problem until I migrate my >> users >> to >> OpenVPN ;) >> >> Thanks >> -Ed >> >> On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:54, Andrew Suffield wrote: >> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Ed wrote: >> > > Any help is greatly appreciated until I move to IPSec... unless >> there >> is >> > > a better VPN than IPSec that works with wintendo. >> > >> > Do yourself a favour and move to openvpn. It will give you far less >> > grief than pptp or ipsec. >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> > Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to >> share >> > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn >> cash >> > >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Shorewall-users mailing list >> > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share >> your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> Shorewall-users mailing list >> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV_______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users >------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Ed wrote:> Hi all, > I have a VPN setup but it only works once in a while. It seems my firewall > (shorewall 3.0.8) is blocking protocol 47. > > Here is what I have: > > eth0: internet > eth2: dmz - my pptp server > > My entry In the rules file: > pptp/ACCEPT fw dmz:192.168.253.2 > > My pptp macro > ############################################################################### > #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL RATE USER/ > # PORT PORT(S) DEST LIMIT GROUP > PARAM - - tcp 1723 > PARAM - - 47 - > #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE > > What my log reports: > warn.log:Nov 30 09:44:32 fw01 Shorewall:dmz2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth0 > SRC=192.168.2.12 DST=81.233.229.117 LEN=65 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=49617 > DF PROTO=47 > > Am I being thick and missing something obvious or could this be a bug of some > sort?The server is the first to speak GRE which your macro isn''t allowing. You need to add this line to your macro: PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 That requires that you be running Shorewall 3.2. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
On Thursday 30 November 2006 16:46, Tom Eastep wrote:> PARAM DEST SOURCE 47Hi, I followed Tom''s advice and upgraded to Shorewall 3.2.4. After making the changes needed after the upgrade and making sure it all worked, I went on to try and get the PPTP VPN working... yes, OpenVPN is in the pipeline ;) This is what I did and these are the errors I get... any help would be appreciated. BTW, this is my config [INTERNET]<---> eth0-[FW SHOREWALL 3.2.4]-eth2 <---> eth0-[VPN SHOREWALL 3.0.8] The macro in on the firewall (FW). I guess I missunderstood something... Test run 1: PARAM 192.168.253.2 - 47 PARAM - - tcp 1723 PARAM - - 47 - Dec 1 09:49:50 fw01 Shorewall:dmz2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth3 SRC=192.168.253.2 DST=192.168.1.10 LEN=65 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=5337 DF PROTO=47 Test run 2: PARAM - 192.168.253.2 47 PARAM - - tcp 1723 PARAM - - 47 - ERROR: Undefined Server Zone in rule "ACCEPT fw 192.168.253.2:dmz:192.168.253.2 47 - - - - -" Test run 3: PARAM - dmz:192.168.253.2 47 PARAM - - tcp 1723 PARAM - - 47 - ERROR: Only DNAT, SAME and REDIRECT rules may specify destination port mapping; rule "ACCEPT fw dmz:192.168.253.2:dmz:192.168.253.2 47 - - - - -" Thank you all for your help. -Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Ed wrote:> On Thursday 30 November 2006 16:46, Tom Eastep wrote: >> PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 > > Hi, > I followed Tom''s advice and upgraded to Shorewall 3.2.4. After making the > changes needed after the upgrade and making sure it all worked, I went on to > try and get the PPTP VPN working... yes, OpenVPN is in the pipeline ;) > > This is what I did and these are the errors I get... any help would be > appreciated. > > BTW, this is my config > > [INTERNET]<---> eth0-[FW SHOREWALL 3.2.4]-eth2 <---> eth0-[VPN SHOREWALL > 3.0.8] > > The macro in on the firewall (FW). I guess I missunderstood something... > > Test run 1: > PARAM 192.168.253.2 - 47 > PARAM - - tcp 1723 > PARAM - - 47 - > > Dec 1 09:49:50 fw01 Shorewall:dmz2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth3 > SRC=192.168.253.2 DST=192.168.1.10 LEN=65 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=5337 > DF PROTO=47 > > Test run 2: > PARAM - 192.168.253.2 47> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users> PARAM - - tcp 1723 > PARAM - - 47 - > > ERROR: Undefined Server Zone in rule "ACCEPT fw > 192.168.253.2:dmz:192.168.253.2 47 - - - - -" > > Test run 3: > PARAM - dmz:192.168.253.2 47 > PARAM - - tcp 1723 > PARAM - - 47 - > > ERROR: Only DNAT, SAME and REDIRECT rules may specify destination port > mapping; rule "ACCEPT fw dmz:192.168.253.2:dmz:192.168.253.2 47 - - - - -"So why didn''t you add the entry to your macro that I gave in in my last message? That is *all* that you had to do after upgrading? You did not have to change your entry in /etc/shorewall/rules; you had to make NO other changes to the macro. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Tom Eastep wrote:> Ed wrote: >> On Thursday 30 November 2006 16:46, Tom Eastep wrote: >>> PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 >> Hi, >> I followed Tom''s advice and upgraded to Shorewall 3.2.4. After making the >> changes needed after the upgrade and making sure it all worked, I went on to >> try and get the PPTP VPN working... yes, OpenVPN is in the pipeline ;) >> >> This is what I did and these are the errors I get... any help would be >> appreciated. >> >> BTW, this is my config >> >> [INTERNET]<---> eth0-[FW SHOREWALL 3.2.4]-eth2 <---> eth0-[VPN SHOREWALL >> 3.0.8] >> >> The macro in on the firewall (FW). I guess I missunderstood something... >> >> Test run 1: >> PARAM 192.168.253.2 - 47 >> PARAM - - tcp 1723 >> PARAM - - 47 - >> >> Dec 1 09:49:50 fw01 Shorewall:dmz2all:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth3 >> SRC=192.168.253.2 DST=192.168.1.10 LEN=65 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=5337 >> DF PROTO=47 >> >> Test run 2: >> PARAM - 192.168.253.2 47 > >> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users > >> PARAM - - tcp 1723 >> PARAM - - 47 - >> >> ERROR: Undefined Server Zone in rule "ACCEPT fw >> 192.168.253.2:dmz:192.168.253.2 47 - - - - -" >> >> Test run 3: >> PARAM - dmz:192.168.253.2 47 >> PARAM - - tcp 1723 >> PARAM - - 47 - >> >> ERROR: Only DNAT, SAME and REDIRECT rules may specify destination port >> mapping; rule "ACCEPT fw dmz:192.168.253.2:dmz:192.168.253.2 47 - - - - -" > > So why didn''t you add the entry to your macro that I gave in in my last message? > That is *all* that you had to do after upgrading? You did not have to change > your entry in /etc/shorewall/rules; you had to make NO other changes to the macro. >In other words, you macro should look *exactly* like this: #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL RATE USER/ # PORT PORT(S) DEST LIMIT GROUP PARAM - - tcp 1729 PARAM - - 47 PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
On Friday 01 December 2006 16:24, Tom Eastep wrote:> PARAM - - tcp 1729 > PARAM - - 47 > PARAM DEST SOURCE 47Hi Tom, What I meant by doing changes was the changes required for an upgrade from 3.0 to 3.2 (macro.HTTP, ...). I did no changes to the rules file. I hadn''t realised "DEST" and "SOURCE" shouldn''t be substituted. So this is what I have now: rules: pptp/DNAT net dmz:192.168.253.2 macro: PARAM - - tcp 1729 PARAM - - 47 PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 error: ERROR: DNAT rules require a server address; rule: "DNAT dmz:192.168.253.2 net 47 - - - - -" I should have mentioned I was using DNAT, sorry about that. Regards, -Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Ed wrote:> On Friday 01 December 2006 16:24, Tom Eastep wrote: >> PARAM - - tcp 1729 >> PARAM - - 47 >> PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 > > Hi Tom, > What I meant by doing changes was the changes required for an upgrade from 3.0 > to 3.2 (macro.HTTP, ...). I did no changes to the rules file. I hadn''t > realised "DEST" and "SOURCE" shouldn''t be substituted. > > So this is what I have now: > > rules: > pptp/DNAT net dmz:192.168.253.2I could have sworn that when you first posted, you had pptp/ACCEPT.> > macro: > PARAM - - tcp 1729 > PARAM - - 47 > PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 > > error: > ERROR: DNAT rules require a server address; rule: "DNAT dmz:192.168.253.2 net > 47 - - - - -" > > I should have mentioned I was using DNAT, sorry about that.Then make the TARGET in the last rule ACCEPT rather than PARAM. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Tom Eastep wrote:> Ed wrote: >> On Friday 01 December 2006 16:24, Tom Eastep wrote: >>> PARAM - - tcp 1729 >>> PARAM - - 47 >>> PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 >> Hi Tom, >> What I meant by doing changes was the changes required for an upgrade from 3.0 >> to 3.2 (macro.HTTP, ...). I did no changes to the rules file. I hadn''t >> realised "DEST" and "SOURCE" shouldn''t be substituted. >> >> So this is what I have now: >> >> rules: >> pptp/DNAT net dmz:192.168.253.2 > > I could have sworn that when you first posted, you had pptp/ACCEPT. > >> macro: >> PARAM - - tcp 1729 >> PARAM - - 47 >> PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 >> >> error: >> ERROR: DNAT rules require a server address; rule: "DNAT dmz:192.168.253.2 net >> 47 - - - - -" >> >> I should have mentioned I was using DNAT, sorry about that. > > Then make the TARGET in the last rule ACCEPT rather than PARAM.Oops -- wrong terminology. The first column in a macro file is ACTION, not TARGET (TARGET is the first column in an action file). At any rate, the last rule in your macro should be: ACCEPT DEST SOURCE 47 -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
On Friday 01 December 2006 17:51, Tom Eastep wrote:> > Hi Tom, > > What I meant by doing changes was the changes required for an upgrade > > from 3.0 to 3.2 (macro.HTTP, ...). I did no changes to the rules file. > > I hadn''t realised "DEST" and "SOURCE" shouldn''t be substituted. > > > > So this is what I have now: > > > > rules: > > pptp/DNAT net dmz:192.168.253.2 > > I could have sworn that when you first posted, you had pptp/ACCEPT. > > > macro: > > PARAM - - tcp 1729 > > PARAM - - 47 > > PARAM DEST SOURCE 47 > > > > error: > > ERROR: DNAT rules require a server address; rule: "DNAT dmz:192.168.253.2 > > net 47 - - - - -" > > > > I should have mentioned I was using DNAT, sorry about that. > > Then make the TARGET in the last rule ACCEPT rather than PARAM. > > -TomI did have an "ACEPT" rule rather than a DNAT... copied the VPN line from my LAN rather than the one for the WAN... sorry again. In any case, it works like a charm now. Thank you so much for your help. I don''t know if I did it right but I created 2 seperate macros, one for an "ACCEPT" rule w/ "PARAM DEST SOURCE 47" and another for a "DNAT" rule w/ "ACCEPT DEST SOURCE 47" Regards, -Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
Ed wrote:> > In any case, it works like a charm now.Great! Thank you so much for your help. You''re welcome.> > I don''t know if I did it right but I created 2 seperate macros, > one for an "ACCEPT" rule w/ "PARAM DEST SOURCE 47" > and another for a "DNAT" rule w/ "ACCEPT DEST SOURCE 47" >You should be able to have only one -- with "ACCEPT DEST SOURCE 47". -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
On Friday 01 December 2006 18:37, Tom Eastep wrote:> You should be able to have only one -- with "ACCEPT DEST SOURCE 47". > > -TomIt did the job! :) Thanks mucho -Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV