http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
I''ve just been hit by an ex-bogon. had to manually edit the rfc1918 file. kudos for the new nobogons option. And thanks for the wonderful work Eduardo Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> Sent by: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net 17/03/2004 22:47 Please respond to Mailing List for Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> To Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>, Shorewall Announcements <shorewall-announce@lists.shorewall.net> cc Subject [Shorewall-users] Shorewall 2.0.1 Beta 1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Post: Shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net Subscribe/Unsubscribe: https://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm
On Thursday 18 March 2004 06:03 am, Eduardo Ferreira wrote:> I''ve just been hit by an ex-bogon. had to manually edit the rfc1918 file.There''s an updated file available from the Shorewall errata page as well.> kudos for the new nobogons option. > > And thanks for the wonderful work >You''re most welcome Eduardo -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
Tom, Is there any difference between Shorewall 2.0.1 and Shorewall 2.0.0 with the bridging patch from http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Bridging/ other than the nobogons option ? I have a bridging firewall running on a 2.4.25 kernel with Shorewall 2.0.0 and the patch. Thanks Sakthi -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Tom Eastep Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 8:47 PM To: Shorewall Users; Shorewall Announcements Subject: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall 2.0.1 Beta 1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
On Thursday 18 March 2004 08:20 am, Sakthivel Subramanian wrote:> Tom, > > Is there any difference between Shorewall 2.0.1 and Shorewall 2.0.0 with > the bridging patch from http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Bridging/ other > than the nobogons option ? >Yes. REJECT rules work with 2.0.1 Beta 1. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
On Thursday 18 March 2004 08:29 am, Tom Eastep wrote:> On Thursday 18 March 2004 08:20 am, Sakthivel Subramanian wrote: > > Tom, > > > > Is there any difference between Shorewall 2.0.1 and Shorewall 2.0.0 with > > the bridging patch from http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Bridging/ > > other than the nobogons option ? > > Yes. REJECT rules work with 2.0.1 Beta 1. >There is also some "work in progress" included in the Beta that isn''t described yet in the Release Notes. That work may or may not be included in 2.0.1 final. Please ignore the LOGPREFIX column in the rules file for now. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net