On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote:> On 4 June 2013 22:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? >> > > AFAIK, yes. http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html > > > if so, are there public build bots for this? >> > > We have one: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt > > Setting it up was just copy&paste on Zorg's config (and fixing the bugs in > the tests). > > > is lnt going to replace test-suite as the normal mechanism for running >> test-suite? >> > > AFAIK, it should have been for manual runs and the bots, and it has been > for the 3.3 release. Do you know of any process that runs with make? >There are several individual users who still use the full Makefile infrastructure. I think we pretty much use LNT exclusively for automated runs now, but for development purposes the Makefile setup still has various features that make it more amenable to incremental development. - Daniel> There might be some left-over bots doing so, but they should be migrated. > > cheers, > --renato > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130617/f86de072/attachment.html>
On 17 June 2013 19:01, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:> There are several individual users who still use the full Makefile > infrastructure. I think we pretty much use LNT exclusively for automated > runs now, but for development purposes the Makefile setup still has various > features that make it more amenable to incremental development. >Hi Daniel, I have been using LNT with --test-only and it's working perfectly fine for my purposes. When I need a bit more fine grained, I go into the test directory and run it manually, and since I'm going to reduce it anyway, I try to be as separated as possible from the test-suite build system. cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130617/f7c1e2f6/attachment.html>
On 06/17/2013 01:02 PM, Renato Golin wrote:> On 17 June 2013 19:01, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org > <mailto:daniel at zuster.org>> wrote: > > There are several individual users who still use the full Makefile > infrastructure. I think we pretty much use LNT exclusively for > automated runs now, but for development purposes the Makefile > setup still has various features that make it more amenable to > incremental development. > >We have been having good luck using lnt with real hardware but there are some bugs/limitations that prevent us from using it with qemu user mode. I've filed the bugs against LNT. The main one is that it creates a target timeit function that is compiled for the target, whereas for qemu user mode it must be compiled for the host. Using the old makefiles, I can do what I need for now. https://dmz-portal.mips.com/wiki/Building_test-suite_and_running_it_under_Qemu> Hi Daniel, > > I have been using LNT with --test-only and it's working perfectly fine > for my purposes. When I need a bit more fine grained, I go into the > test directory and run it manually, and since I'm going to reduce it > anyway, I try to be as separated as possible from the test-suite build > system. > > cheers, > --renato-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130617/fb0a7423/attachment.html>