search for: zttest

Hi list! I'm trying to setup a new * server with a TE210P in a Dell 2850 box. I'm using zaptel version 1.2.5, the linux flavour I'm using is CentOS 4. In a previous thread I read about the results I should expect from zttest. On my home box (using the crappy Asus A7V600) I got really bad results from zttest (just over 97.5) but I know that this motherboard just sucks. To my (huge) disappointment however the results from zttest are equally as bad as from my home box?? (just over 97.5) lspci -vb reveals that the c...

I am having trouble with zttest on a Tyan board, dual AMD Opteron's on FC3. Tried different kernels, no IRQ sharing, everything looks in order. My zaptel modules load fine, but if I run zttest, it just hangs. Below is the strace output and you can see where it stops. Anyone have any ideas? [root@asterisktest zaptel]#...

...ANDALONE_ZAPATA -c -o ztmonitor.o ztmonitor.c cc -o ztmonitor ztmonitor.o cc -c ztspeed.c cc -o ztspeed ztspeed.o cc -I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA -c -o zttool.o zttool.c cc -o zttool zttool.o -lnewt cc -I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA zttest.c -o zttest zttest.c: In function `main': zttest.c:65: parse error before ')' token make: *** [zttest] Error 1 I am running Red Hat Linux, Kernel is: linux-2.4.20-8 Any ideas? TIA Jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lis...

Hello, Today we setted up a server that needs to use MeetMe but doesn't have any Zap hardware. So we need to use ztdummy (at least, this was our idea). Rarely: zttest is not working at all (100% bad, using zttest -v doesn't give anything, etc.). Of course, after load ztdummy, there isn't any background or anything. It is the same kernel (Debian Etch default kernel, 2.6.18) than other machine that is working. CPU is a HP, Pentium 4 (same than other machi...

Hi, I would like to know what type of configuration could get me closer to 100% hits in zttest, when testing a TDM400P with 4 FXO ports, I am currently running kernel 2.4.31, on a IBM Xseries 306, with 3gh CPU, HT is disabled, PCI latency was changed, i still cant get more then 99.975% in the zttest testings, Thanks for any info. Marco.

Hello! While performing some zttest's for some time today, I was also keeping an eye of a top of the machine. While the zttest was running, I also had a ssh-keygen and a dd creating a 5GB file on an EXT3 partition running. I noticed that for the most part, I got a decent number of 100%'s, and a bunch of 99.6%'s or h...

Another request make me test my t1 card, which has no quality problems, but all that I get is: [root@SIP2-MI zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99...

Hi, I have a TDM400P running with only one FXO port running on a VIA EPIA MS10000 (1Ghz Via Eden). When I run zttest from Zaptel 1.2.1 it hang and when I interrupt it with Ctrl-C that is the result: ?anyone have some idea about why isn't working? Some additional info: # /usr/src/zaptel/zttest -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... --- Results after 0 passes --- Best: 0.000000 -- Worst: 100.0...

I have a P3-800 with two IDE drives in a software RAID1 configuration. Each drive is on a separate IDE channel. Now anytime there is HD activity, I hear "beeps" and "cutting out" on a call using the X100P card. I ran the zttest program, and discovered HD activity would drop the accuracy down to between 2% and 50%. However I noticed if I disabled one drive in the RAID1 array, zttest would always report 99.98% or higher. So one drive running works fine, but as soon as I enable the second drive, all hell breaks loose. DMA...

I was browsing the applications developed in zaptel and came across zttest. After I run it, I get the following: Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 100.000000% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.98...

Hi I am trying to build reliable fax solution with asterisk, iaxmodem and hylafax. I am attempting to do this on Compaq DL-360 with 2 pentium 3 1.2GHz (512 cache) and 2GB of RAM. I am using a Sangoma A101. After installing the newest zaptel and wanpipe-3.1.0 beta I did zttest and it didn't give me good results: 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% --- Results after 14 passes --- Best: 99.975586 -- Worst: 99.975586 -- Average: 99.975586 Sangoma card...

Our asterisk system gains access to the PSTN through a voip provider. We have no digium or other telephony hardware in our system. Do the zttest results still matter to us? Our results were as follows: --- Results after 1007 passes --- Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.780273 -- Average: 99.975763

I've made some modifications to zttest in order to use it as a frame clock accuracy tester / slip detector. I'm not certain if that was it's original purpose, but it seems that a lot of folks try to use it that way. The result is something that I'm calling ztclock for now to help avoid confusion. I'm including the sourc...

Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [root@mollendo ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 sam...

Hello, I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64. linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.97558...

Hi Asterisk Users, we are using Asterisk 1.4.18.1 on debian 4.0 etch, pwlib 1.10 and openh323 1.18. We are using MeetMe for conference calls and with two participants there is no echo problems, but with more than two participants there is a lot of echo that sometimes disappear for a short time and all function well. Someone have some suggestions?? Do you ever used app_conference

...a Panasonic DBS PBX via PRI. Outbound calls from the PBX go out via PRI to Asterisk, then out to the Telco's PRI. The sync LEDs on my PBX show that it is synced to Asterisk via the PRI. I have users complaining about random hangups. What is the best way toi approach finding the issue? ref: zttest looks good. ./zttest -vv Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 99.987793% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 99.987793% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.0000...

> They instantly got us to look at the output of zttest and we found that this was (in their words) 'extremely low', with 'best' and > 'worst' readings of 99.975586% and 99.963379% respectively. Might want to give PCI latency setting a try, it helped for me. My ZTTEST would drop occasionally to 99.95% until I set: setpc...

Friends, I'm having severe problems with zaptel timers on Intel Dual Core systems with SMP code enabled. Ztdummy, zaptel connected to Digium TDM or PRI cards - all ends up with large timer probems - zttest going down to 50% accuracy on some systems, even to -1 on ztdummy systems and voice quality is no more. A restart is the only way to get back to a working system. We're only running a few meetme's with a total of 10 participants, so the load is not excessive. Only SIP calls, nothi...

...have modified the 2 and 1 timing source declarations to several different configurations but am unsure what the proper way to configure that is. Is my current setup correct? Both span one and span three have timing on the line from the carrier. Rundown of issues seen with these cards: TE410P: - zttest will never report 100% for me across different motherboards (Supermicro P8SCT, Dell 850) - Crash/instability of about once per two weeks where I have to power cycle the server, i.e. phone calls stop working and a reboot fixes it TE406P: - zttest runs flawlessly on this card, 100% across the board...