Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "xense".
Did you mean:
sense
2005 Jun 22
0
RE: [Xense-devel] Re: [PATCH] sHype access controlarchitecture for Xen
...may which documented some of the MAC
related discussions)
<rant>
I''d rather see discussions on these subjects than whether gcj compiles
the policy compiler or whether it should be written in a different
language etc.
</rant>
rolf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xense-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xense-devel-
> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of aq
> Sent: 21 June 2005 15:49
> To: Ray Valdez
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; Stefan Berger; Tupshin Harper;
> steven.hand@cl.cam.ac.uk; xense-devel@lists.xensource.com
> Subje...
2005 Aug 18
4
[PATCH] ACM: adding C-support for policy translation and labeling support for domains
This patch:
* adds a C-based security policy translation tool to Xen (secpol_xml2bin)
and removes the current Java
security policy translator (Java dependencies). The C-based tool
integrates into the Xen source tree build
and install (using gnome libxml2 for XML parsing). See install.txt.
* introduces security labels and related tools. Users can now use
semantic-rich label names to put
2006 Aug 31
0
[Xense-devel] [RFC][PATCH][ACM] enforcing ACM policy on network traffic between virtual network interfaces
...164 1 -b---- 0.3 Avis
domain2 3 164 1 -b---- 0.3 Hertz
Domain-0 0 1948 4 r----- 236.2
SystemManagement
Signed-off by: Reiner Sailer <sailer@us.ibm.com>
_______________________________________________
Xense-devel mailing list
Xense-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xense-devel
2010 Jan 09
0
Real-Time and XenSE
We are interested in building a Xen application that is secure and
compatible with running Java RTS on Solaris 10 with trusted extensions
domUs. If you have a thought on this, we would appreciate it.
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2005 Jun 21
3
[PATCH] Makefiles of policy_tool
This patch (againstChangeSet@1.1727) makes some cleanups to Makefile
of policy_tool, and add install target. It also removes policy_tool in
uninstall target from top level Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <aquynh@gmail.com>
Makefile | 1 +
tools/policy/Makefile | 19 +++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
2006 Dec 20
0
[Xense-devel] [PATCH] [3/4] Flask XSM tools
This patch implements the Flask tools for the xen control plane (xm &
xend). The patch also refactors the ACM toolchain so that a common
security API (based on the existing ACM toolchain) is exported to xm and
xend.
To create a domain with the Flask module, add the following (for
example) to a domain''s configuration file
access_control =
2007 Sep 19
4
vtpm_manager can''t run twice in a row
I can get vtpm_manager to run if I delete /var/vtpm/VTPM. However, when
I kill it with control-c, and try to run it again, I get:
INFO[VTPM]: Starting VTPM.
INFO[TCS]: Constructing new TCS:
INFO[TCS]: Calling TCS_OpenContext:
INFO[VTSP]: OIAP.
INFO[VTSP]: Loading Key into TPM.
INFO[VTSP]: Unbinding 256 bytes of data.
ERROR in VTSP_Unbind at vtsp.c:720 code: TPM_BAD_PARAMETER.
ERROR in
2006 Sep 22
1
[RFC][PATCH][UPDATED] Intel(R) LaGrande Technology support
This patch adds SMP support to the previous version. Since that has not
been merged I have included it in this patch. This should apply cleanly
to the tip. Below is the text of the original submittal, slightly
updated.
Attached is a preliminary patch that adds Intel(R) LaGrande Technology
(LT) (Safer Mode Extensions - SMX) support to Xen. While there are
still several enhancements needed for
2005 Aug 17
1
[PATCH] vTPM support for XEN - Part 1
Attached is the patch that provides additions to include files,
particularly to support the control messages for the TPM front- and
backend drivers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2007 Apr 12
4
Re: [Xense-devel] [RFC][PATCH][UPDATED] Intel(R) LaGrande Technology support
Hello,
Has any more work been done on this front? The message below is
from Sept. 2006. In particular, the LT/TXT Technology Enabling
Platform (TEP) is now available from MPC Corp. Where can one
obtain an appropriate AC SINIT module (i.e., like
lpg_sinit_20050831_pae.auth.bin below)? I would like to begin
using Xen with TXT support.
Thanks,
-Jon
This patch adds SMP support to the
2008 Aug 26
2
vTPM NVM, loadkey and trousers questions
...ctl: (25) Inappropriate ioctl for device
TDDL tddl.c:117 Falling back to Read/Write device support.
Does anyone know if 0.2.9 is just outdated or should it be working and there is something else wrong?
Any hints are very welcome!
Thanks in advance
Tim
[0]http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xense-devel/2007-04/msg00005.html
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
____________...
2006 Jul 20
0
[RFC][Re: Xen Roadmap proposal] Grant table sockets
...iminate the network
dependence of some Xen management applications, particularly those that
rely on XML-RPC to communicate. For example, xm currently uses a UNIX
domain socket to communicate with Xend, which introduces an artificial
requirement that xend and xm be running in the same domain. Once XenSE
gains traction and management utilities are scattered across multiple
domains, UNIX domain sockets will no longer be adequate. Under this
scheme, stream sockets to specific domains could easily be constructed,
without regard for the network configuration on the system.
One important detail that I...
2005 Nov 24
1
[PATCH] dom0_ops -EPERM not -EACCES?
Hi all,
dom0_ops return -EACCES when the interface version in wrong. I think
that an acm failure is closer to being non-priv''ed, which returns
-EPERM. Wouldn''t want dom0 tools to report they were the wrong version
just because ACM limited some operation, surely?
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (authored)
diff -r e2d1c88d50f7 xen/common/dom0_ops.c