This patch (againstChangeSet@1.1727) makes some cleanups to Makefile of policy_tool, and add install target. It also removes policy_tool in uninstall target from top level Makefile. Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <aquynh@gmail.com> Makefile | 1 + tools/policy/Makefile | 19 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Steven Hand
2005-Jun-21 07:39 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xense-devel] [PATCH] Makefiles of policy_tool
> This patch (againstChangeSet@1.1727) makes some cleanups to Makefile > of policy_tool, and add install target. It also removes policy_tool in > uninstall target from top level Makefile.I''m not sure we want to install policy_tool into /sbin by default; it''s something that only the brave should play with for now... cheers, S. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 6/21/05, Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:> > > This patch (againstChangeSet@1.1727) makes some cleanups to Makefile > > of policy_tool, and add install target. It also removes policy_tool in > > uninstall target from top level Makefile. > > I''m not sure we want to install policy_tool into /sbin by default; > it''s something that only the brave should play with for now... >but only the brave play with -unstable tree, no? ultimately this tree is for testing purpose, isnt it? or you want to install the tool elsewhere? btw, looks like the xense-list is a moderated list? regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reiner Sailer
2005-Jun-21 13:23 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xense-devel] [PATCH] Makefiles of policy_tool
xense-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com wrote on 06/21/2005 03:39:19 AM:> > > This patch (againstChangeSet@1.1727) makes some cleanups to Makefile > > of policy_tool, and add install target. It also removes policy_tool in > > uninstall target from top level Makefile. > > I''m not sure we want to install policy_tool into /sbin by default; > it''s something that only the brave should play with for now... > > > cheers, > > S. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xense-devel mailing list > Xense-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xense-develOn one hand, the policy_tool should not do much if the NULL policy is compiled in. On the other hand, the policy_tool is still pretty "pre-mature" and probably deserves to linger for a little while in the tools directory only. Thanks Reiner _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Apparently Analagous Threads
- RE: [Xense-devel] Re: [PATCH] sHype access controlarchitecture for Xen
- [PATCH] Makefile uninstall not to remove libxutil
- [PATCH] ACM: adding C-support for policy translation and labeling support for domains
- [LLVMdev] project built with LLVM
- vtpm_manager can''t run twice in a row