search for: x_error

...ce_match, NVPciProbe }; @@ -214,18 +234,46 @@ NVPciProbe(DriverPtr drv, int entity_num, struct pci_device *pci_dev, drmVersion *version; int chipset, ret; char *busid; + struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen = NULL; - if (!xf86LoaderCheckSymbol("DRICreatePCIBusID")) { - xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "[drm] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol\n"); - return FALSE; - } - busid = DRICreatePCIBusID(pci_dev); - - ret = nouveau_device_open(busid, &dev); - if (ret) { - xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "[drm] failed to open device\n"); - free(busid); - return FALSE; + if (xorgWayland) { +...

...41,28 @@ NVPciProbe(DriverPtr drv, int entity_num, struct pci_device *pci_dev, drmVersion *version; int chipset, ret; char *busid; +#ifdef XORG_WAYLAND + struct xwl_screen *xwl_screen = NULL; + if (xorgWayland) { + xwl_screen = xwl_screen_create (); + if (!xwl_screen) { + xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "Failed to initialise xwayland.\n"); + return FALSE; + } + if (xwl_drm_pre_init(xwl_screen) != Success) { + xwl_screen_destroy(xwl_screen); + xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "Failed to initialise xwayland drm.\n"); + return FALSE; + } + ret = nouveau_device_wrap(xwl_screen_...

...|| level < 0) + return; + + len = snprintf(val, BACKLIGHT_VALUE_LEN, "%d\n", level); + sprintf(path, "%s/%s/brightness", + BACKLIGHT_CLASS, drmmode_output->backlight_iface); + fd = open(path, O_RDWR); + if (fd == -1) { + xf86DrvMsg(output->scrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, + "failed to open %s for backlight control: %s\n", + path, strerror(errno)); + return; + } + + ret = write(fd, val, len); + if (ret == -1) { + xf86DrvMsg(output->scrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, + "write...

Here are a few patches adding some missing functions in NvPlatformProbe, which iirc is being used as of xserver 1.13 First patch adds a nouveau_kernel_mode_enabled helper, similar to xf86-video-radeon Second and third use the function in Nv{Pci,Platform}Probe And last one ensures we can still use ZaphodHead and relative head positioning via xorg.conf The coding style may be a bit off, despite my

Had those patches living in my local tree for a while now. Here is a respin on top of latest master Patch 1: regression fix, preventing the ddx from loading if kernel module is not loaded Patches 2-5: Completely nuke dri1, make dri2 hard dependency Patches 6-7: Assist people with first-time build of nouveau Git complains about whitespace errors in patch 7, which for the sake of me I cannot

...glxIsCompatible() +{ + XF86ModuleData *d = LoaderSymbol("glxModuleData"); + + if (!d) { + xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_INFO, + "NOUVEAU: Couldn't find glx module informations. " + "Assuming it is disabled.\n"); + return TRUE; + } + + if (!d->vers) { + xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, + "NOUVEAU: glx module has no version information!\n"); + return FALSE; + } + + if (!d->vers->vendor) { + xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, + "NOUVEAU: glx module has no vendor information!\n"); + return FALSE; + } + + Bool ok = strcmp(d->vers->vendor, MODULEVENDORSTRI...

...]; + + atom_range[0] = min; + atom_range[1] = max; + + *atom = MakeAtom(name, strlen(name), TRUE); + err = RRConfigureOutputProperty(output->randr_output, *atom, + FALSE, TRUE, immutable, + 2, atom_range); + if (err != 0) { + xf86DrvMsg(output->scrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, + "RRConfigureOutputProperty error, %d\n", err); + } + err = RRChangeOutputProperty(output->randr_output, *atom, + XA_INTEGER, 32, PropModeReplace, 1, &value, FALSE, TRUE); + if (err != 0) { + xf86DrvMsg(output->scrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, + "RRChange...

.../src/nv_dma.c b/src/nv_dma.c index d2a6d00..339b4fe 100644 --- a/src/nv_dma.c +++ b/src/nv_dma.c @@ -53,8 +53,13 @@ NVInitDma(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn) ret = nouveau_object_new(device, 0, NOUVEAU_FIFO_CHANNEL_CLASS, data, size, &pNv->channel); if (ret) { - xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, - "Error creating GPU channel: %d\n", ret); + if (ret == -ENODEV) + xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, + "'No such device' while creating GPU channel: perhaps you disabled " + "accelleration in your module config but not in your X.O...

[PATCH 1/3] kms: Don't hardcode the output properties [PATCH 2/3] kms: Implement output->get_property when RandR1.3 is available. [PATCH 3/3] kms: Add TV-out support src/drmmode_display.c | 403 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

...c/nv_driver.c b/src/nv_driver.c index e726292..4c40763 100644 --- a/src/nv_driver.c +++ b/src/nv_driver.c @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ NVHasKMS(struct pci_device *pci_dev, struct xf86_platform_device *platform_dev) case 0xf0: case 0x100: case 0x110: + case 0x120: break; default: xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "Unknown chipset: NV%02x\n", chipset); @@ -930,6 +931,7 @@ NVPreInit(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int flags) pNv->Architecture = NV_KEPLER; break; case 0x110: + case 0x120: pNv->Architecture = NV_MAXWELL; break; default: -- 2.1.4

...xf86AllocateScreen I end up with xf86GPUScreens == 1 and xf86NumScreens == 0. The xf86GPUScreens seems to be ignored by all the following code, only xf86NumScreens is evaluated afterwards in xf86BusConfig: /* If nothing was detected, return now */ if (xf86NumScreens == 0) { xf86Msg(X_ERROR, "No devices detected.\n"); return FALSE; } Is the issue that xf86NumScreens is zero at the beginning, or that xf86GPUScreens is not taken into account later on? Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and best regards, Clemens

...deletions(-) diff --git a/src/drmmode_display.c b/src/drmmode_display.c index 803785d..4d2d09d 100644 --- a/src/drmmode_display.c +++ b/src/drmmode_display.c @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ drmmode_set_mode_major(xf86CrtcPtr crtc, DisplayModePtr mode, if (ret) { xf86DrvMsg(crtc->scrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, - "failed to set mode: %s", strerror(-ret)); + "failed to set mode: %s\n", strerror(-ret)); return FALSE; } @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ drmmode_gamma_set(xf86CrtcPtr crtc, CARD16 *red, CARD16 *green, CARD16 *blue, size, red, green, blue); if (ret != 0) { xf...

...ct pci_device *pci_dev) } static Bool +NVHasMirSupport(struct pci_device *pci_dev) +{ + char *busid; + + busid = XNFprintf("pci:%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", + pci_dev->domain, pci_dev->bus, pci_dev->dev, pci_dev->func); + + if (xmir_get_drm_fd(busid) < 0) { + xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "[XMir] GPU %s not handled by Mir\n", busid); + free(busid); + return FALSE; + } + free(busid); + return TRUE; +} + +static Bool NVPciProbe(DriverPtr drv, int entity_num, struct pci_device *pci_dev, intptr_t match_data) { @@ -343,6 +362,9 @@ NVPciProbe(DriverPtr drv, int entity_...

...channel %d\n", fifo->channel); + if (pNv->Architecture >= NV_ARCH_C0) { + struct nvc0_fifo *data = (struct nvc0_fifo *)fifo; + ret = nouveau_bo_wrap(pNv->dev, data->notify, + &pNv->notifier_bo); + if (ret) { + xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR, + "Failed to obtain notifier bo: %d\n", ret); + NVTakedownDma(pScrn); + return FALSE; + } + } + ret = nouveau_pushbuf_new(pNv->client, pNv->channel, 4, 32 * 1024, true, &pNv->pushbuf); if (ret) { diff --git a/src/nv_driver.c b/src/nv_driver.c ind...

Hi Ilia, > Very odd. Perhaps you're trying to run X as non-root and don't have > proper permissions on /dev/dri/card0? It seems like something in > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/xf86-video-nouveau/tree/src/nv_driver.c#n400 Thanks for the pointer, I'll try to dig a bit deeper there. I forgot to mention that I am trying to run X inside an debian unstable chroot (the

...f86GPUScreens == 1 and > xf86NumScreens == 0. > > The xf86GPUScreens seems to be ignored by all the following code, only > xf86NumScreens is evaluated afterwards in xf86BusConfig: > /* If nothing was detected, return now */ > if (xf86NumScreens == 0) { > xf86Msg(X_ERROR, "No devices detected.\n"); > return FALSE; > } > > Is the issue that xf86NumScreens is zero at the beginning, or that > xf86GPUScreens is not taken into account later on? > > Any help would be highly appreciated. > > Thanks and best regards, Clemens...

...c/nv_driver.c b/src/nv_driver.c index fff83f8..61940a8 100644 --- a/src/nv_driver.c +++ b/src/nv_driver.c @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ NVHasKMS(struct pci_device *pci_dev, struct xf86_platform_device *platform_dev) case 0xf0: case 0x100: case 0x110: + case 0x120: break; default: xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "Unknown chipset: NV%02X\n", chipset); @@ -941,6 +942,7 @@ NVPreInit(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int flags) pNv->Architecture = NV_KEPLER; break; case 0x110: + case 0x120: pNv->Architecture = NV_MAXWELL; break; default: diff --git a/src/nvc0_accel.c b/src/nvc0_accel.c index...

...40a8 100644 > --- a/src/nv_driver.c > +++ b/src/nv_driver.c > @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ NVHasKMS(struct pci_device *pci_dev, struct xf86_platform_device *platform_dev) > case 0xf0: > case 0x100: > case 0x110: > + case 0x120: > break; > default: > xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "Unknown chipset: NV%02X\n", chipset); > @@ -941,6 +942,7 @@ NVPreInit(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int flags) > pNv->Architecture = NV_KEPLER; > break; > case 0x110: > + case 0x120: > pNv->Architecture = NV_MAXWELL; > break; > default: > diff --git...

...c/nv_driver.c b/src/nv_driver.c index fff83f8..61940a8 100644 --- a/src/nv_driver.c +++ b/src/nv_driver.c @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ NVHasKMS(struct pci_device *pci_dev, struct xf86_platform_device *platform_dev) case 0xf0: case 0x100: case 0x110: + case 0x120: break; default: xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "Unknown chipset: NV%02X\n", chipset); @@ -941,6 +942,7 @@ NVPreInit(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int flags) pNv->Architecture = NV_KEPLER; break; case 0x110: + case 0x120: pNv->Architecture = NV_MAXWELL; break; default: diff --git a/src/nvc0_accel.c b/src/nvc0_accel.c index...

..._driver.c > @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ NVHasKMS(struct pci_device *pci_dev, struct xf86_platform_device *platform_dev) > case 0xf0: > case 0x100: > case 0x110: > + case 0x120: > break; > default: > xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, "Unknown chipset: NV%02x\n", chipset); > @@ -930,6 +931,7 @@ NVPreInit(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int flags) > pNv->Architecture = NV_KEPLER; > break; > case 0x110: > + case 0x120: > pNv->Architecture = NV_MAXW...