search for: x86cmp

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "x86cmp".

Did you mean: x86_mc
2013 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] VCOMISS instruction in X86
Hi, I'm looking at scalar and packed instructions in X86. The instruction VCOMISS is scalar. May I remove SSEPackedSingle/SSEPackedDouble domain from it? defm VUCOMISS : sse12_ord_cmp<0x2E, FR32, X86cmp, f32, f32mem, loadf32, "ucomiss", SSEPackedSingle>, TB, VEX, VEX_LIG; defm VUCOMISD : sse12_ord_cmp<0x2E, FR64, X86cmp, f64, f64mem, loadf64, "ucomisd", SSEPackedDouble>, TB, OpSize, VEX,...
2006 Oct 05
1
[LLVMdev] The meaning of SDNPHasChain
...usage of it? In particular, I have found that CMP nodes for different targets are described differently with regard to this property. ARM backend defines armcmp without this property. PCC defines PCCvcmp and PCCvcmp_o also without this property. In Sparc backend SPcmpicc is also not using it. But X86cmp does for some reason. I'm trying to understand if I need it for my backend or not. It would be also interesting to get some information about other SDNP-* SelectionDAG node properties, e.g. SDNPOutFlag, SDNPInFlag, SDNPOptInFlag and their purpose. -Roman _____________________________________...
2006 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] Questions about instruction selection and instruction definitions
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >> Check out how the sparc or powerpc backends handle this. They lower >> to a >> select_cc pseudo-op that expands to an if/then/else control flow. > > Thanks! The hint about a pseudo-op was really good. After I realized how > it works, I started the implementation of SELECT_CC using this approach. > Hopefully, I can
2006 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] Questions about instruction selection and instruction definitions
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > >> You can add the line > >> setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT, MVT::i32, Expand); > >> to the constructor of you TargetLowering class. See the current > >> backend for an example. > > > > I actually tried it first. But then if, I remember correctly, > SELECT > > nodes were expanded into