search for: wup

Hi all, Anyone know anything about Windows Universal Platform? Someone raised an issue on github: https://github.com/xiph/flac/issues/32 The `flac_max`/`flac_min` issue is resolved, but the WUP one is not. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

...ure R implementation on SO at some point in his lost youth: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3224731/john-tukey-median-median-or-resistant-line-statistical-test-for-r-and-line This one does indeed generate the line of identity for the (1:9, 1:9) case, so I do suspect that we have a genuine scr*wup in line(). Notice, incidentally, that > line(1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1),1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1)) Call: line(1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1), 1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1)) Coefficients: [1] -0.9407 1.1948 I.e., it is not likely an issue with exact integers or perfect fit. -pd > On 29 May 2017, at 07:21 , GlenB...

...point in his lost youth: >> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3224731/john-tukey-median-median-or-resistant-line-statistical-test-for-r-and-line >> >> This one does indeed generate the line of identity for the (1:9, 1:9) case, so I do suspect that we have a genuine scr*wup in line(). >> >> Notice, incidentally, that >> >>> line(1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1),1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1)) >> Call: >> line(1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1), 1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1)) >> >> Coefficients: >> [1] -0.9407 1.1948 >> >> I.e., it is not likel...

I have released rsync version 2.6.6. This release is a bug-fix release to handle a null-pointer bug that turned up in rsync's version of zlib 1.1.4 (this is not the recent zlib 1.2.2 security fix, which did not affect rsync) and to squash a few other minor bugs. To deal with the zlib issue, rsync has been upgraded to include zlib 1.2.3. Here is a list of the changes between 2.6.5 and 2.6.6:

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20081112/618073fe/attachment.pl>

I have released rsync version 2.6.6. This release is a bug-fix release to handle a null-pointer bug that turned up in rsync's version of zlib 1.1.4 (this is not the recent zlib 1.2.2 security fix, which did not affect rsync) and to squash a few other minor bugs. To deal with the zlib issue, rsync has been upgraded to include zlib 1.2.3. Here is a list of the changes between 2.6.5 and 2.6.6:

...on on SO at some point in his lost youth: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3224731/john-tukey-median-median-or-resistant-line-statistical-test-for-r-and-line > > This one does indeed generate the line of identity for the (1:9, 1:9) case, so I do suspect that we have a genuine scr*wup in line(). > > Notice, incidentally, that > >> line(1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1),1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1)) > Call: > line(1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1), 1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1)) > > Coefficients: > [1] -0.9407 1.1948 > > I.e., it is not likely an issue with exact integers or perfect fi...

...st youth: >>> >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3224731/john-tukey-median-median-or-resistant-line-statistical-test-for-r-and-line >>> >>> This one does indeed generate the line of identity for the (1:9, 1:9) case, so I do suspect that we have a genuine scr*wup in line(). >>> >>> Notice, incidentally, that >>> >>>> line(1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1),1:9+rnorm(9,,1e-1)) >>> Call: >>> line(1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1), 1:9 + rnorm(9, , 0.1)) >>> >>> Coefficients: >>> [1] -0.9407 1.1948 &gt...

To play with RJS I just made a "rake freeze edge". But this copies only the libs into vendor/rails and any attempt of "rake update_javascripts" fails. But all the he required javascripts are there, at: BASEPATH/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/javascripts/ Except of prototype, they seem to have no version number, so I am asking whether I should take those

Tukey divides the points into three groups, not the x and y values separately. I'll try to get hold of the book for a direct quote, might take a couple of days. On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/05/2017 9:28 PM, GlenB wrote: > >> Bug: stats::line() does not produce correct Tukey line when n mod 6 is 2 >> or

First of all, I think dovecot is really fantastic and I have thanks for all the hard work. I think it will be the best fit for my ~5000 users when I have it setup completely. We normally have approx 500 concurrent IMAP connections during the day. I am trying to convert from courier-imap to dovecot, but I have an issue with public namespace folders that are not writable by certain users.

...m3q6_>nhQnRgzWY-i at f88jXgm_Mx}Xz$m5NlgpLSDZCnqh#p3V zi5TIj20B!y#z0C&^wE{0g%*w}O9U=gQW3)o<cWwzH+n=klmxPrx7e1lPO9)01 at k;@ z84{+&?e?n090S_>EQM|b!2{a3f3892+>7d(l5Z>@fkiCopJ&LB1wE_DR{BPv#o<!g zo_Jn=QLM$kSnG^IYrj(2qg1u#LY>bOXQn1A5h(hT6}eY_N93_q$!p<R{-K?U^^p?W zsf5;IWUp0%H44!rih&wo2Ax&Xi>Bu?-oF)AH~C3-D&|}RsniN{o>7sAUQjDQkhUv{ zV$P;D);)@6l+zk2K3%ii`E(6)@6$HTy-(XXcRpS7-21c*bo!jD(5)P9>1=UD9L^UU zVoIvVWN at HT6`ih^3{<4}K&2*`h<>XEUJ;hf1tnwgwcgS)Eixzy_hk*CURbZ*Yl4&L z3WDe)Whm|OMpu}mi2G#blHY|yN-(7)tx1YMMa at CNZL5OM*jB}L#n2M>TqXY|...