search for: wringers

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > The way in which Gallium3D targets LLVM, is that it waits until it receives > the shader program from the application, then compiles that down to LLVM IR. > That's too late to start synthesizing hardware (unless you're planning to > ship an FPGA as the graphics card, in which case reprogramming

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > >> The way in which Gallium3D targets LLVM, is that it waits until it receives >> the shader program from the application, then compiles that down to LLVM IR. >> That's too late to start synthesizing hardware (unless you're planning to >>

We currently have a samba install on Solaris 8 providing a front-end to a Rational ClearCase system. Because of some recent changes, we are having Kerberose issues in validating files (too many open files). After some research, I found that the best way to resolve these is to re-compile samba as a 64bit application to increase the open file restrictions on a Solaris 32 bit app. The problem I am

-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of nik600 Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 2:00 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] problem with outgoingcallsUnabletocreatechannelof type 'ZAP' (cause 34 -Circuit/channelcongestion) On 2/17/06,

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > i was just writing this: > http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/ > > when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would > greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible. > > put these together: >

> No matter what, once you push your branch and make it public, anyone > could pull it and then rewriting history gets trickier. IME it's best > to avoid doing that as much as possible. If we have automation that looks at public topic branches (possibly because of a github pull request), then people will start making branches public sooner rather than later. That's when we

i was just writing this: http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/ when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible. put these together: http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/epp/zynq-7000/index.htm

Hi Dave, I installed it one month ago and was very surprised by the sound quality. The stream seemed to sound better in Quintessential than in Winamp. MAX -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Dave St John Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:11 PM To: icecast@xiph.org Subject: Re: [icecast] winamp 5 release Anyone have extensive