search for: wilm

...-function(x) { print(2*x) }(2) f1(3) ## does the command and gives an error ("attempt to apply non-function") and ## f2<-function(x) { return(2*x) }(2) f2(3) ## is perfectly fine. Thus the return statement changes the interpretation as a function? Or do I miss something? Best wishes Wilm Am 21.10.2016 um 17:00 schrieb William Dunlap: > Here is a simplified version of your problem > > { sqrt }(c(2,4,8)) > [1] 1.414214 2.000000 2.828427 > Do you want that to act differently? > > > Bill Dunlap > TIBCO Software > wdunlap tibco.com <http://tibco.com...

...#39;(' formlist ')' cr expr_or_assign %prec LOW should be of way higher precedence. But I cannot forsee the side effects of that (which could be horrible in that case). If this is the desired behaviour and not a bug, I'm very interested in the rational behind that. Best wishes, Wilm ps: $ R --version R version 3.3.1 (2016-06-21) -- "Bug in Your Hair"

...ent, I would expect: f2 <- (function(x) { x<-x+1; log }) (x) However, regarding the answers I will try to construct the AST regarding the grammar defined in gramm.y of that statement f2 <- function(x) { x<-x+1; log } (x) to understand what the R interpreter really does. Best wishes, Wilm

Are you saying that f1 <- function(x) log(x) f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) should act differently? Using 'return' complicates the matter, because it affects evaluation, not parsing. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > thx for the reply. Unfortunately that is not a simplified version of the > problem. You have a function, call it and get the result (numeric in, > numeric out in that case). For simplicity lets use the "return&quo...

Hi, is there a way to get the number of all possible matches for a specific query? Some api call like Xapian::doccount Xapian::Enquire::get_number_of_matches(); Best wishes Wilm

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

Here is a simplified version of your problem > { sqrt }(c(2,4,8)) [1] 1.414214 2.000000 2.828427 Do you want that to act differently? Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired behaviour > of my R installation on the evaluation of anonymous functions. > > minimal working example > > ### > f<-function(x) { >...

...that {log} would act differently than log. I suppose it is a matter of taste, but I say yuck. As for 'return', don't use it if you want readable code. It is like a goto but worse. It is never necessary. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap: > >> Are you saying that >> f1 <- function(x) log(x) >> f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) >> should act differently? >> > yes...

Hi all, I have data which is represented as a histogram and want to add more data / another histogram to this plot using another color. That is I need to superimpose multiple histograms. But have no idea how to do this. Can anybody please give me a hint? Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Wilm Institut fuer Physikalische Biologie Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf http://www.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de E-Mail: wilm at biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de / 0x7C68FBCC Phone: +49 211 8115966

Hi! I''m new here! I downloaded shorewall because I want to set up a firewall and Webmin already has a module for it. (I love Webmin!) When I went to start shorewall I got the message that it needs ip. I''m running Slackware and apparently ip is not included with it. Would somone please help me out and let me know where I can download ip from? Thanks. Jim

...d (I hope I understood this), that you (and the "e1071" people) use "as.double()" and give ".C" an array and one have to "parse" the matrix again in the C function. This sounds a little complicate. Isn't there another way? A more adapted way? Greetings Wilm ps: I joined the R-devel list, but didn't get an confirmation mail. I hope this is normal --

There was a lengthy power failure here in Shoreline this morning and my firewall did not come back up when power was restored. The firewall is now up and service to the server has been restored. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \

Is it possible to filter HTTP signatures/headers with SHOREWALL ? or is there addon for it ? take care *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Stingray *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email

hi, i have a strange situtation. i try to connect to my machine with ssh and the packets are dropped but i have at the top of my rules an accept. the configuration looks like: rules-file: ----------- ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 - TCPDUMP-log: ------------ 12:16:08.153934 84.153.98.30.1322 > [my-destination-machine].ssh: S 3717288415:3717288415(0) win 64240 <mss

...ire additional configuration, is that a route for the 10.0.0.0/24 net via the 10.0.10.0/24 (dmz) net? ....to 10.0.10.1 kind regards, Kristian. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Alexander Wilms Sent: 30. mai 2005 20:43 To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Proxy ARP working from Internet but not from fwand loc On Monday 30 May 2005 17:01, Kristian wrote: Hi Kristian, just a quick guess: Do you have the correct route on your servers back to the 10.0.0.0/24...

...#39;'s not available. Question, What''s the procedure for me to add this feature in iptables and into my kernel? Do I need the kernel and iptables sources as well as the patch-o-matic tool? Has anyone have done this before? I need the easiest way to make it work. BTW. Thanks to Mr Alex Wilms for the tip :) TIA Jan TIA Jan --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now

Thanks Alexander Wilms ... that fixed the problem ... YOHOOO.....I'' am so happy Rob

Hi, Xapian uses a directory as standard storage backend. Is that possible to pack everything in a file (a tar file for example), and to tell libxapian to open it (by telling him at which offset are the different stuff)? If this is not possible yet, would that be technically possible to implement such a feature? How complex would that be? Kind regards Emmanuel -- Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline &

I am making a new box to test with and was trying to install shorewall via rpm. So I download the shorewall 2.2.5 rpm and issue a rpm -ivh shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch.rpm. I then get an error: error: Failed dependencies: which is needed by shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch So as you can see there are no dependency issues. I thought I saw this on the mailing list a while ago but I just searched for it I did

Hello, You will find in attachment the layout of my current physical configuration. For now, the Cable ISP is not used. Since it is a dynamic ISP, my mailserver is rejected and my domain name registers on blacklists like ORDB and al. I want it to be used as a default gateway except for my mail server that would be seen as coming from my "honest" ADSL ISP. Here is