search for: wholeheartly

On 06/07/2017 11:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > Mark stop with the flame baiting please. > > This is nothing systemd specific - and keep in mind /var/tmp is a > persistent temp area unlike /tmp which as it's tmpfs by default is of > course emptie don boot. I would wholeheartedly disagree. This IS something systemd specific. I have never seen init.d blow itself up over

Thanks for the response, Jeremie. I wholeheartedly agree about testing. In my case, this feature would be used purely to reduce computation time. I?m calculating an expensive (and embarrassingly parallel) likelihood function, and for some parameter combinations my objective function diverges to infinity. In those instances, I?d like to throw an error that stops subsequent computations and that I

While setting up my first dial plan, I find that notions like remote ip, network, or incoming network interface seem to be totally lacking regarding calling parties, where * still seems to fully rely on the easily spoofable caller id. Especially, allowing only certain ips or networks to enter a specific context in the dial plan is apparently not possible, at least in the h323 world. Don't

Unfortunately that's not really an R question. I recommend that you read up on the statistical methods underneath. One that I'd wholeheartedly recommend is Prof. Harrell's `Regression Modeling Strategies'. [BTW, there are now two implementations of gam() in R: one in `mgcv', which is fairly different from that in `gam'. I'm guessing you're referring to the one

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Jonathan Lennox wrote: > Every armv7 (and armv8) iOS device has supported Neon, and Xcode support for > armv6 was dropped with Xcode 4.5. > > Even if you?re compiling with an old Xcode version to support really old iOS > devices, Apple?s armv6/armv7 selection was a compile-time switch (supported > using fat binaries). ?I think the arch can be detected based

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:30:35PM -0700, Eric Lindblad wrote: > I don't know if it would be of any use - and I know that > the configure script searches for gawk, sed and grep - > but Watcom has free 32 and 64 bit compilers, and > the msvc files for Xapian no longer appear to be > maintained, so perhaps Xapian build files written for > [Open] Watcom could be made, as such

On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > If I may add my two cents: > > I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am working on. And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely write to stdout and stderr as it is a component which can be used in all sorts of code, be it a GUI IDE, a CLI driver, or whatever. LLVM

Hi everyone, I have translated part of the llvm/clang documentation (from English to Chinese). I wonder if it's possible to merge them into llvm-project/doc ? Or place a link or short description on llvm.org to direct people to the same repo to save duplicate efforts and make it more updated and complete? Regards, Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:radkins@impelind.com] > I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you > believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going > unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions. I see it go both ways. The really "interesting" problems that uncover new bugs in

On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:12:06 -0700 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > > > If I may add my two cents: > > > > I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am > > working on. And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a > > problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely

On 30/04/2020 09:50, William Edwards wrote: > I want to do this because IPv4 is a legacy protocol. I do not need IPv4, it is old, and I do not want IPv4 in my network if I don't need it. Just because something is legacy, it doesn't mean you cannot still use it. >> Do you have more than 2,147,483,647 computers, printers, scanners etc ? > No. > Then you have no real need to

On 16 December 2016 at 19:28, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > It may be good to compile a wishlist about a linker to collect feature ideas > people wish to use. I honestly know only one major request: embedding a > linker to a program. I guess that this single feature satisfies a majority > of needs as per 80:20 rule, but I really want to know what people wish to >

Hi James, Yes, documents changes over the time. And keeping them up-to-date would takes a lot of efforts. I tried years ago (2013~2015) with clang v3.4 , and finally I gave up. It's too much for one person to complete. The reason I come up again with this idea is that I saw people still referencing the partial complete Chinese docs and sharing it among others. And there's other people

...about maybe stripping all zip, exe, pif, etc attachments from emails coming to vorbis@xiph.org? Granted, Ryan Ashley has a Very Valid Point and I agree wholeheartedly about "Any idiot who opens a pif, exe, bat, com, or any other executable file deserves what they get." and would actually encourage these feeble minded folks to "Please, Open it and Darwinate your dumb self

If I may add my two cents: I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am working on. And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely write to stdout and stderr as it is a component which can be used in all sorts of code, be it a GUI IDE, a CLI driver, or whatever. Also, I have a number of times wondered about the somewhat unusual use of

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:12:06 -0700 >> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: >> >

In my work with a simple localization plugin, i''m running into a lot of places in the Rails core, where text and other localization specific information is hardcoded. I''ve included some examples in the bottom of this post. It''s hard for an outsider to know, if the hardcoded values are a result of inconsistency in code, or "by design". I hope that we can have

On 03/11/2017 11:48, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, we're in a bit of a v2.3 merge frenzy. Much of the LMTP code will be > replaced in v2.3, but I'll give the? older code a look as well. > > This can take a while though. Thank you very much for getting back to me, I can appreciate it can get hectic, and I don't wish to appear ungrateful, I wholeheartedly

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:12:06 -0700 > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > > > > > If I may add my two cents: > > > > > > I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am >

Hi All, needed some direction for a newbie to RoR. I have done work in Java, .net and perl, and really prefer perl and java over .net, now we are we are looking to start building a financial trading application, most of the team wants to go with .net while I am trying to build the case with Ruby. Some of our classes have been developed in delphi7. Would I be able to use RoR on the front end of