search for: wholeheartedly

On 06/07/2017 11:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > Mark stop with the flame baiting please. > > This is nothing systemd specific - and keep in mind /var/tmp is a > persistent temp area unlike /tmp which as it's tmpfs by default is of > course emptie don boot. I would wholeheartedly disagree. This IS something systemd specific. I have never seen init.d blow itself up over bloody symlinks. The readahead, while /possibly/ nice isn't at all necessary on modern hardware. I want my hardware to boot consistently, not bomb like an Adam Sandler movie because of /symlinks/....

Thanks for the response, Jeremie. I wholeheartedly agree about testing. In my case, this feature would be used purely to reduce computation time. I?m calculating an expensive (and embarrassingly parallel) likelihood function, and for some parameter combinations my objective function diverges to infinity. In those instances, I?d like to throw an e...

...tly not possible, at least in the h323 world. Don't know yet about sip or aix, but I guess it's the same since the extension syntax xyz => extension/somevariable limits routing decisions to built in variables, where ip related info is simply missing, at least as far as I can see (you are wholeheartedly invited to prove me wrong). Question hence: did anybody tackle those issues anyway, maybe on code level (patch/extra module)? Are plans underway to fix that stuff? I just can't believe that, if my above statements were right, anyone would expose an * server to the internet and still feel secur...

Unfortunately that's not really an R question. I recommend that you read up on the statistical methods underneath. One that I'd wholeheartedly recommend is Prof. Harrell's `Regression Modeling Strategies'. [BTW, there are now two implementations of gam() in R: one in `mgcv', which is fairly different from that in `gam'. I'm guessing you're referring to the one in `gam', but please remember to state which con...

...ven theoretical use for runtime detection on iOS would be trying to include NEON instruction codepaths in armv6 slices, but there's little reason for that, and you can't probably even submit such binaries to appstore any longer even if you'd have an old xcode version around. Thus, I wholeheartedly agree that there is no point in runtime detection for this on iOS - checking the __ARM_NEON__ define at compile time is enough. // Martin

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:30:35PM -0700, Eric Lindblad wrote: > I don't know if it would be of any use - and I know that > the configure script searches for gawk, sed and grep - > but Watcom has free 32 and 64 bit compilers, and > the msvc files for Xapian no longer appear to be > maintained, so perhaps Xapian build files written for > [Open] Watcom could be made, as such

On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > If I may add my two cents: > > I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am working on. And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely write to stdout and stderr as it is a component which can be used in all sorts of code, be it a GUI IDE, a CLI driver, or whatever. LLVM should not be doing this. > Also, I have a number of times wondered about the somewhat u...

Hi everyone, I have translated part of the llvm/clang documentation (from English to Chinese). I wonder if it's possible to merge them into llvm-project/doc ? Or place a link or short description on llvm.org to direct people to the same repo to save duplicate efforts and make it more updated and complete? Regards, Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:radkins@impelind.com] > I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you > believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going > unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions. I see it go both ways. The really "interesting" problems that uncover new bugs in the Samba code generally get a lot of attention. (Sometimes forwarding them to samba-t...

...un, 03 Jun 2012 12:12:06 -0700 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > > > If I may add my two cents: > > > > I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am > > working on. And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a > > problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely write to stdout and stderr as > > it is a component which can be used in all sorts of code, be it a > > GUI IDE, a CLI driver, or whatever. > > LLVM should not be doing this. > > > Also, I ha...

On 30/04/2020 09:50, William Edwards wrote: > I want to do this because IPv4 is a legacy protocol. I do not need IPv4, it is old, and I do not want IPv4 in my network if I don't need it. Just because something is legacy, it doesn't mean you cannot still use it. >> Do you have more than 2,147,483,647 computers, printers, scanners etc ? > No. > Then you have no real need to

...e of stability and performance, a next-steps list is a good way to go. > I agree with a fine print that I wish people working on LLVM and clang aware > that best practices in compilers may not be directly transferable to > linkers. Linkers and compilers are different kinds of programs. Wholeheartedly agree! This is already true for compiler-RT, libc++, the test-suite, polly and many other "LLVM branded" projects. > The first thing that comes up to my mind with regard to pushing LLD forward > as an LLVM project is to move more code to LLVM libraries so that we can > make LL...

...And they are more likely to contribute to llvm/clang project in return. 2. This would have even further impact. like helping tech writers and authors. Regards, Max On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:08 PM James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hi Max, > > Whilst I wholeheartedly support the concept of translating the docs into other languages, the problem with it is that they are likely to rot very quickly as changes are made to the canonical English versions. How would you propose these be kept up-to-date? > > James > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 00:49, yun xinyi...

...about maybe stripping all zip, exe, pif, etc attachments from emails coming to vorbis@xiph.org? Granted, Ryan Ashley has a Very Valid Point and I agree wholeheartedly about "Any idiot who opens a pif, exe, bat, com, or any other executable file deserves what they get." and would actually encourage these feeble minded folks to "Please, Open it and Darwinate your dumb self right off the net". There are minimum aptitude levels for driving, th...

If I may add my two cents: I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am working on. And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely write to stdout and stderr as it is a component which can be used in all sorts of code, be it a GUI IDE, a CLI driver, or whatever. Also, I have a number of times wondered about the somewhat unusual use of error strings in LLVM (...

...com> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: >> > >> > > If I may add my two cents: >> > > >> > > I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am >> > > working on.  And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a >> > > problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely write to stdout and stderr as >> > > it is a component which can be used in all sorts of code, be it a >> > > GUI IDE, a CLI driver, or whatever. >> > >> > LLVM should n...

In my work with a simple localization plugin, i''m running into a lot of places in the Rails core, where text and other localization specific information is hardcoded. I''ve included some examples in the bottom of this post. It''s hard for an outsider to know, if the hardcoded values are a result of inconsistency in code, or "by design". I hope that we can have

...a bit of a v2.3 merge frenzy. Much of the LMTP code will be > replaced in v2.3, but I'll give the? older code a look as well. > > This can take a while though. Thank you very much for getting back to me, I can appreciate it can get hectic, and I don't wish to appear ungrateful, I wholeheartedly endorse/recommend dovecot and the company I work for does use paid for OX elsewhere. For my own part, the platform I manage is > 300,000 mailboxes and dovecot performs incredibly well. I came up with some much smaller patches that accomplish the same thing in v2.2 using built-in functions and p...

...s Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > > > > > If I may add my two cents: > > > > > > I am planning to use LLVM as the backend for a compiler I am > > > working on. And I wholeheartedly agree with Justin that it is a > > > problem, if LLVM is allowed to freely write to stdout and stderr as > > > it is a component which can be used in all sorts of code, be it a > > > GUI IDE, a CLI driver, or whatever. > > > > LLVM should not be doing this. &g...

Hi All, needed some direction for a newbie to RoR. I have done work in Java, .net and perl, and really prefer perl and java over .net, now we are we are looking to start building a financial trading application, most of the team wants to go with .net while I am trying to build the case with Ruby. Some of our classes have been developed in delphi7. Would I be able to use RoR on the front end of