search for: whirls

We''ve been experimenting with zfs on OpenSolaris 2008.11. We created a pool in OpenSolaris and filled it with data. Then we wanted to move it to a production Solaris 10 machine (generic_137138_09) so I "zpool exported" in OpenSolaris, moved the storage, and "zpool imported" in Solaris 10. We got: Cannot import ''deadpool'': pool is formatted

Hi, I have been working towards developing compiler optimization tools targeting multi core processors while using LLVM IR as the starting point and building on top of the analysis and optimization passes available in the llvm source. Recently, I looked into Open64 and its intermediate representation WHIRL. Documentation for developers to use Open64 seems to be inadequate (when compared to LLVM

Hi, Gang: I remember there were different voices when you check-in the code. I agree with them although I didn't reply your mail in open64's mailing list. In the transformation you illustrate, it involves two operations: 1) promote WHILE-loop into DO-loop (i.e noncountable loop to countable loop) 2) get rid of trip-count dec/inc and compare. 1) is irrelevant to HW loop.

Hi, Arvind Sudarsanam: I know some of Open64. Above all, Open64 is designed for a high performance compiler. It is now supported by AMD, HP, ICT Chinese Academy of Science, etc. and has been ported to X86, Itanium, Loongson CPU etc. And to your questions 1, Open64 already have some main optimization phases, Inline for aggressive inline opt. LNO for loop opt, WOPT for machine independent opt(

With the recent build system fixes and the addition of theora support to ogginfo, I'm thinking vorbis-tools is ready for release. Can people please give current svn head a whirl and report any remaining problems? I also understand from Mike that the new CBR mode support in oggenc requires a bugfix that's in the vorbis svn head, so we'll need to release that at the same time.

Trying to get at least my backlog of bug fixes out... I'm hoping to do a 4.03 next week. Please help by: a) giving it a whirl; b) letting me know if I have missed any low-risk bugfixes. Gene: I did not include your UI branch in this release, because it made me a bit nervous... poke me on IRC when you have a chance. -hpa

Hi Dan, On 25 Apr 2013, at 01:01, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote: > The main alternative approach that's been discussed is to do FastISel to a target-independent opcode set on MachineInstrs, and then do legalization and ultimately the last phase off instruction selection proper after that. The most obvious advantage of using LLVM IR for legalization is that it's

I''m using ruby 1.8.6 p111. But some people seem to think that version 1.8.5 is better. Should I give it a whirl? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe

Hi shuxin, Promote while-loop to do-loop is the job of loop induction recognized, not this transformation. The scalar transform for hwloop in optimizer is for that it is a trouble to discriminate trip counting code with the real production code stuff and do the elimination in cg, we have to write customized code to handle this general stuff in ervey targets. So, we take the help from optimizer

Hi James, > Yes - sorry I was unclear. I have pruned everything down to a pretty > minimal test: > - LLVM 2.6 compiled from source > - A slightly modified version of Duncan's example ll assembly posted earlier > - A minimal personality function (just a call to fprintf()) in a > separate C file compiled with gcc-llvm > - A single C++ function in a third file that simply

I just set up the latest dashboard release candidate in hopes of trying out the new inventory service. After modifying the puppet- dashboard config to use the inventory service and after changing my auth.conf I gave it a whirl but ran into some issues.. I initially tried using fact_terminus = yaml and was able to do some queries via curl. I''m currently using storeconfigs so setting up

Hi, I just upgraded to 4.8.9 and decided to give the samba_gpoupdate feature a whirl. However, it fails. The line that's failing is "gpos = ads.get_gpo_list(creds.get_username())" returning None. This is probably a failure, since it should otherwise return an empty list (if there were no gpos to return). But there is no output to indicate what may be failing. I have setup of three

Monty merged his branch onto mainline. mainline is now beta4. Give it a whirl, test the crap out of it, etc. I've got about 20-30 emails full of minor patches and a few big patches for build system stuff, so for those of you who were waiting on me, I haven't forgotten and will be getting to those in the next few days. If all goes well, we'll be tagging beta4 and cutting the

Monty merged his branch onto mainline. mainline is now beta4. Give it a whirl, test the crap out of it, etc. I've got about 20-30 emails full of minor patches and a few big patches for build system stuff, so for those of you who were waiting on me, I haven't forgotten and will be getting to those in the next few days. If all goes well, we'll be tagging beta4 and cutting the

Just started a new project and I''ve decided to give GIT a whirl to see if I like it. The first thing that has me stumbling a little is the best way to add files to a git repository when you generate a new model/scaffold/ controller. Let''s say I add a new scaffold, which creates a dozen files or so. I know I can ''git add path/to/file'' for each new file. Could I

Just wondering if there are any known issues with USB 3.0 storage devices in Centos 6.5?? I just got one of these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817332028 it does either esata or USB 3.0. My new motherboard (ASUS M5A99X EVO R2.0) supports both, so I've tried both (of course, can't have a feature without at least giving it a whirl! :)). esata seems to work fine, I

On 01/30/2017 03:18 AM, Jinesh Choksi wrote: >>Are there other kernel options that might be useful to try? > > pci=nomsi > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1521173/comments/13 Incidentally, already found that one and I'm trying it currently on one of the boxes. So far there's been no issues, but it's only been since Friday. Also, I found

No comment on the usefulness of your function, as I''ve yet to try it. But for the "this" scope problem, try this... (removed your var and added the bind(this) after the function declaration. I didn''t test it though so you might want to give it whirl. It might introduce a different scope problem with the "attr" var but I think it should work.

I am unable to run Generals, or Generals: Zero Hour with wine. The splash screen comes up, but then it says it cannot locate the DVD - which is in the drive and it actually whirls up to speed when the splash screen starts... Any ideas?

I am the designer for open64 hwloop structure, but I am not a student. Hope the following helps: To transform a loop into hwloop, we need the help from optimizer. For example, while(k3>=10){ sum+=k1; k3 --; } into the form: zdl_loop(k3-9) { sum+=k1; } So, we introduce a new ZDLBR whirl(open64 optimizer intermediate) operator, which represents the loop in whirl as: