search for: wfw

My server is RH 5.2 and i use Samba 1.9.18p10 and the client use WFW 3.11 with tcp/ip protocols installed. The subnet and the IP Address is right but I still only telnet form WFW 3.11 to Linux...not the reverse. On Linux telnet is working. I've checked it through this cmdline "telnet localhost 23 or telnet 127.0.0.1" . And I also testparm smb.conf and...

Is there anyway to ascertain what shares a client actually has mounted at a given time? I've got a number of WFW boxes connecting shared drives on my SCO-OSE3 box using SAMBA 1.9.16p5 (upgrading to latest version RSN). I've got some shell scripts on the Unix box which use escape sequences sent to the client telnet to start programs on the client side. Some of these programs assume that some shares from...

...y which includes several subdirectories from a Unix server. Browsing the subdirectories on an Windows 3.11 Client leads to an unestimated result. All files in the second subdirectory-level are invisible. The files in the first subdirectory-level could be accessed normally. This is only a problem on WfW Clients, browsing the directories on a NT host leads to no problem. Here is a part of my smb.conf file: [global] guest ok = no guest account = %U case sensitive = yes preserve case = yes admin users = root browsable = yes...

Hi, Sorry if this is the documentation somewhere; however, I need a little tutorial help on howto configure a Wfw client for Samba: I have two samba servers, 1.9.18p2, on a couple of our Sun machines running Solaris 2.3. I know how to gain access from various Win95 machines in our group; however, I was requested to set up access for a Win3.11 machine today, and I'm kinda stumped. This machine does have t...

...rely on these entries. In the file dialogues this particular application does not allow access to the parent directory (remember Windows 3.x - you didn't have those fancy trees and dropdown boxes then). Some hints -Everything works fine when accessing the directory listing of another networked WfW Workstation. So we can rule out a fundamental error on the WfW clients. -This problem does not occur when accesing the samba-Server from Windows NT 4.0 Wks 4.0SP0/4.0SP5. -This problem did not occur in an earlier samba release we used. I can't access the older version number right now. Any hin...

...rver. System Configuration: One LAN with two machines. (2 meter between them) The Server: Linux box running RedHat 5.0 (Pentium II at 266 MHz. with 64 Mb of RAM) Samba version 1.9.17p4 that came with RedHat distribution. Lan connection running OK. (telnet server ,ftp server ,etc.) The Client: WfW 3.11 box (486 DX2 at 66 MHz. with 8 Mb of RAM) Lan connection running OK. (telnet, ftp, etc) The things that I can do now: a) Use the linux box as a file sharing system with SMB in a windows network. I can log in the linux box and access my files there from the WFW box whithout any problem....

Hi. I followed the advises from yours but I still can't do tcp/ip from wfw when booting diskless. I was told to run the wsahdapp.exe file, but when I do it windows tells me : winsock api Instalation Error The DOS sockets TSR is not loaded and of course when I try to run netscape it tells me: Netscape was unable to create a network socket connection There may be insuff...

Hi We are using a Debian 1.3.1 server (two Ethernet-Cards) with 18 Clients. The Clients remote-boot from the server using mars_nwe(Novell-Server emulation). Under Windows (WfW 3.11) the Clients user the Microsoft 32-bit Tcp-Stack to access the samba-server( 1.9.18p7). The problem is that the clients can't see the samba-server in their browse-lists, nor can they access the server with net use... \\h931srv\... - altough the clients register their ip-address at the serv...

...ecause the one I downloaded from MS didn't connected to my samba server. I used a dos clients that creates a NT server anyway after memmaker I get only 420 ks free, any help in this point would be gratefully appreciated. I tried to follow the docs I found in the samba site. 3.- I installed wfw, but netscape isn't able to see the tcp ip that is in the dos below (in dos I do pings and so) What windows flavour do I have to install ? 3.1 , 3.11 wfw ? Do I have to use something like trumpet ? I'm doing it completely wrong ? -- ^-^.-----. mailto:frankie@citel.upc.es...

...th. Both windows and linux server have the same settings in rsyncd.conf. Would be great if there is someone with any ideas how to solve this problem! Thanks, -- Sattler Media Press GmbH Ulrich Jung Kurt-Sattler-Stra?e 9 - 38315 Hornburg Fon +49 5334 29 152 Fax +49 5334 29 344 mailto:ulrich.jung@wfw.de http://wfw.de

...n Fri, 27 Mar 1998 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 09:54:21 -0500 > From: "W.J. McEachran" <billjr@penny.com> > Subject: Re: What shares are mounted on client ? > > On Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 09:51:07PM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > > > WFW can be configured to delay the connect on shares until it is actually > > required. I think M$ calls it "Shadowed connections". That could explain > > what you are seeing. There's a checkbox for this when you Connect to a > > network drive. > > Update: I'm...

...machines are likely to understand how to share files across subnets using the same workgroup name...but is Samba as adept? I have a feeling that is at the heart of my problem. I enabled wins support in my smb.conf and assigned the Samba box's IP address as the primary wins server on the WFW box. I also set Samba to be the domain master browser according to the instructions in BROWSING.txt. All of this, alas, was useless as I still couldn't browse the Win-duhs shares from Linux or the Linux shares from Winduhs. I feel that I'm getting much closer to my goal (file sharing...

...nkerpos /usr/samba.moonrock/private/smbpasswd ankerpos:921:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[U ]:LCT-0 smbd.conf (global section): [global] printing = sysv printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes guest account = nobody workgroup = WFW os level = 33 encrypt passwords = yes security = user preserve case = yes hosts allow = ..... log file = /var/samba.moonrock/log/smb/log.%m log level = 3 max log size = 500 deadtime = 120 dfree command=/usr/samba.moonrock/bin/dfree server string = # character set...

...8 characters. This default causes printer names that are longer than 8 characters in the /etc/printcap file to NOT appear in the printer browse list. If we were to remove this limitation and allow more than 8 characters then we will get complaints from some users who use older SMB clients (eg: old WfW, Older DOS clients, etc.). In order to avoid these complaints we have kept the 8 character limit in place. The real question now at hand is this: How long after one has eaten the chicken ought we hold on to it's legs? Given that the old SMB clients are really quite obsolete, should we continue...

I have just upgraded from 1.9.16p9 to 1.9.17. Platform: SunOS 4.1.4 In a DOS window under WfW 3.11 I can not delete any files, including ones created in the same DOS window, unless I wild card them: fails: del a.txt works: del a.* Any ideas gratefully received! Regards, Mark.

...OS client 3.0 redirector to work with Samba. I'm sure you'll find it ugly, but it works. Under CORE protocol, the $"#&^ MS client sends unencrypted passwords to the samba server (maybe there is no support of encryption in CORE, I don't know). So as my clients are either W95, WfW, NT or DOS machines, I simply remove the support of LANMAN1 and LANMAN2 protocols in the negotiation between Samba and the client. All machines which are not DOS will agree on a higher protocol anyway ... The only trade-off (?) is that at the first time, the DOS clients have to connect with the...

I use WFW and Samba Version 1.9.17p1, on Sun Solaris 2.4 I want to use remote shell command from my PC Can you help me best regards -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

...r = no > os level = 17 > announce as = NT Server ^^^^^^^^^ Maybe if you didn't announce as NT Server, the real NT machine wouldn't think you were a BDC. I don't know what the options are off the top of my head (I think it might be to fool WfW or something) but it *might* help... ************************************************************* Steve Arnold sarnold@earthling.net http://www.rain.org/~sarnold "A mime is a terrible thing to waste..." Mel Brooks

Hi, Quick q. Has anyone tried this, and what's the success/failure of this? Changing param/loadparm.c : /* Types of machine we can announce as. */ #define ANNOUNCE_AS_NT_SERVER 1 #define ANNOUNCE_AS_WIN95 2 #define ANNOUNCE_AS_WFW 3 #define ANNOUNCE_AS_NT_WORKSTATION 4 static const struct enum_list enum_announce_as[] = { {ANNOUNCE_AS_NT_SERVER, "NT"}, {ANNOUNCE_AS_NT_SERVER, "NT Server"}, {ANNOUNCE_AS_NT_WORKSTATION, "NT Workstation"}, {ANNOUNCE_AS_WIN95, &qu...

...a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd ; guest account = pcguest log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m ; Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb) max log size = 50 ; Options for handling file name case sensitivity and / or preservation ; Case Sensitivity breaks many WfW and Win95 apps ; case sensitive = yes short preserve case = yes preserve case = yes ; Security and file integrity related options lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks locking = yes ; Strict locking is available for paranoid locking situations only ; enabling this sever...