search for: warrens

Hi all, I've run into problems compiling the llvm-gcc frontend on x86_64. Is this not supported, or am I making an error somewhere? The procedure I followed was: 1. Download LLVM 2.0 source as a tarball (from a few days ago, during the testing phase). 2. Download the llvm-gcc4 source today, as a tarball. 3. Extract both. 4. Configure LLVM as: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install

Hi Warren, You have the -m32 flag set, but it's still giving you this: > Warning: Generation of 64-bit code for a 32-bit processor requested. > Warning: 64-bit processors all have at least SSE2. But are you sure you want to compile the LLVM-GCC source? You should use the binaries unless absolutely necessary. -bw On May 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Warren Armstrong wrote: > Hi all,

hi, i use xapian to index a txt file, it's size is 268M. i take each line as a document, and each line has two field like 13445511 | 111115151. the recored size is 10000000. the XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD set 1000000. it takes 1026544ms to index the file, it is more slower than lucene. The lucene speed is about 40000 records per second. code: try { Xapian::WritableDatabase

Hi Warren, you can try to configure with the following export CFLAGS="-m64" export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64" LLVM: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --enable-optimized --enable-jit --enable-targets=host-only make LLVM-GCC: ../llvm-gcc4-2.0.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/warren/llvm/obj/ --enable-languages=c,c++

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > ... except that Warren’s proposal that started this discussion seems to imply that he > > has a use case that requires reciprocals to be turned off separately. > > Just to close this loose end, yes I have a use case. > > Specifically, we have a customer that turns on

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: >> >> On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. >> >> From Mehdi: >> >>> Hope this clarify where I see the

>All that said, I think we (the company I work for, Sony) will have to implement support >for these switches. It comes down to GCC has these switches (e.g., -fno-reciprocal-math >and -fno-associative-math), and they do suppress the transformations for our customers. >They switch to Clang/LLVM, they use the same switches, and it doesn't "work". So as a >practical

On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> $ sudo chcon -R -t samba_share_t /path/to/share > > Updated the page as suggested. Thanks. Thanks! I now see another instance of this in section 3. Instead of copying the text verbatim, it should

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > Can you elaborate what kind of runtime failure is the reciprocal transformation triggering? > > Yes. It was along the lines of: > > { > float x = a / c; > float y = b / c; > > if (y == 1.0f) { > // do some processing for when

On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. From Mehdi: > Hope this clarify where I see the direction going, and even if you don’t agree with my > reasoning, the conclusion should be satisfactory on your side :) I'd say that summarizes my thoughts on this well. And from Nicolai: > Right. I'm not fundamentally opposed to having these

I don’t really like the idea of updating checks of UnsafeAlgebra() to depend on all of the other flags. It seems like it would be preferable to look at each optimization and figure out which flags it actually requires. I suspect that in many cases the “new” flag (i.e. allowing reassociation, etc.) will be what is actually needed anyway. I would be inclined to agree with Niolai’s suggestion of

Reviews Wanted. I''ve read the tables of contents and haven''t yet made up my mind. Is one book clearly better than the other? Is one clearly full of bugs? Is one so much further ahead that there is no choice? Are they both so incomplete that I should just wait and only cook real food? Do trains still have dining cars? Warren Fred -------------- next part -------------- An

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 14:55 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> > wrote: > > On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >

can someone please tell me why everyone else can connect to my samba server but me? I mean I even went as far as installing a new OS ("down-graded" back to win2k). I really need help trying to figure out why. If someone can help me in figuring that out, please let me know. And by the way...I already tried the router thing....same issue. So the router doesnt matter because I disabled the

So there's your answer, Rick. How persistent are you? :-) Michael ----- Forwarded message from Warren Togami <warren at togami.com> ----- >So, Warren, how'd you do it? :) 3 months of harassing them and several NDA and licensing agreements I had to sign. Good luck... Warren ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/

Version 3.0.0cvs protocol version 30.PR4 Capabilities: 64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, no ACLs, xattrs, iconv The exclude test fails on OS X Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.1 RELEASE_I386. It just hangs there until CTL-C. The same test passes on the G4 PPC Darwin 8.10.0, and on i686 Xeon

Every post I do to this mailinglist is followed by a bounce message from "centos.5.warren at recursor.net". I have no clue why this is being send to me, afaics some IP address is being blacklisted but I am not related to it. Am I the only one who gets this and can we remove this person from the mailinglist ? Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/

Hi, I'm using the Read command the read a DTMF tone. In this read command I play a voice-file. But now when I press one off they keys of my telephone the voice-file will stop playing a the program go the next priority. Is it possible to play the voice-file until the right DTMF tone is pressed? (say for instance the Zero). Kind regards Arjan Kroon Mobillion B.V.

Depends what you want to do! Do you want to do VoIP over that T1 to a provider or IP telephones? Do you want to hook up to the PSTN through that T1 as 24 voice channels, through a T1 card on your asterisk? If you want to use the T1 as 24 voice channels, the Telco is going to have to re-provision the T1 as a voice T1, because currently, presumably it is one big channel of data. You could have

On Mac OS, in order to allow ssh using dsa keys, I would copy ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub from my machine into ~/.ssh/authorized_keys of the target machine. I've created .ssh directories in my account home as well as in /root and copied the respective keys to authorized_keys files in each. Strangely, I can now ssh as root with no password but my own user account still prompts for a password. What