search for: vitriolic

A colleague is receiving some data from another person. That person reads the data in SAS and it takes 30s and uses 64k RAM. That person then tries to read the data in R and it takes 10 minutes and uses a gigabyte of RAM. Person then goes on to say: It's not that I think SAS is such great software, it's not. But I really hate badly designed software. R is designed by

Hi, I am new to the job and forum. I installed puppet and puppetmaster and set up my first dependencies acording to a manual that we have here in our company. Everything works fine and I can set up new nodes with several modules to choose from. Unfortunatley the Dashboard <http://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs/dashboard>gives me errors instead of starting correctley. Here the

Owen Anderson wrote: > There's nothing particularly stopping you from having your > installation package include copies of gas and ld, I disagree. gas and ld are not available on Windoze, except via MinGW. Yes I can make or tell my customers to install MinGW, but if MinGW is installed, then I don't need LLVM. (More about this further ahead) > You're welcome to think

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > > http://www.xiph.org/about.html Note also the paragraph at http://www.xiph.org/ : "Xiph.Org Foundation is a non-profit corporation dedicated to protecting the foundations of Internet multimedia from control by private interests. Our purpose is to support and develop free, open protocols and software to serve the public, developer and business

Hi -- subject says all. I just want the code for that function, which I guess was in Venables and Ripley as early as 1994. Well, and for any of the sub-functions that glm.nb calls. I can't install the entire MASS library. If the code for just glm.nb (again, don't want to touch the MASS library, last time I tried to install it was a complete nightmare and fiasco) is somewhere on a

Am 2015-04-02 um 18:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofm?ller: >> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >>>> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >>>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>>> On Mit,

On 12/30/02 10:59 AM, "Aaron Gaudio" <prothonotar@tarnation.dyndns.org> wrote: > Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: >> >> http://www.xiph.org/about.html > > Note also the paragraph at http://www.xiph.org/ : > > "Xiph.Org Foundation is a non-profit corporation dedicated to protecting the > foundations of Internet multimedia from control by

I am starting to receive a lot of unsolicited email at work. I did a web search on my name to see if my email address is accessible on any web sites. I got a hit on this site http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba/Dec2000/00720.html which is a message I sent to your list server a couple of years ago. Please remove my email address from the web page. Thanks. Lloyd Baldwin Computer Systems

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8

The CentOS Project seems to be having a problem within some of our community interactive areas that we need to address. As most of you know, the project provides CentOS software free of charge and we also provide community areas like a Wiki, Mailing Lists, IRC Channels and Fora for our users to interact with one another and allow the CentOS community to provide support for each other. There are

----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Y Knight via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at llvm.org> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 6:08:08 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct > ... > >

Behold, Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> hath decreed: > > > It's icecast. It's part of xiph. It's the same project. Presumably it's > > the same developers. I don't care about the similarity of the code > > bases. One is released, the other one is not (alpha versions are not > > releases). > > No. Whilst it originally shared one

It is obsoleted since Dec 2005. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang at redhat.com> --- Documentation/ABI/obsolete/o2cb | 11 ----------- Documentation/ABI/removed/o2cb | 10 ++++++++++ Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 10 ---------- fs/ocfs2/cluster/sys.c | 9 --------- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) --- diff

I need to apologize to many of you, especially Gabor, for my vitriol over buildbot breakages. I get very enraged by breakages that occur over long periods of time. Here's an attempt to explain why I fly off the handle at these. Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it. I came up with the

I don't see much in the way of an ability to write reports in R the way you can with SAS. You basically have to write a program with R in a 3G way unlike SAS with it's 4G proc print and proc report. Are there similar R functions and packages? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-reports-tp2330733p2330733.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at

I wonder whether there is any comment on the following. It is a summary of a 10 minute contribution that I made to a biostatistical workshop help yesterday in Sydney. My aim was to highlight the benefits of the Linux/R development model, in a session with the title: "How can statistical packages be improved?" =================================================================== The R

Jon Harrop wrote: > Can you explain why you would like to generate DLLs on the > customer's computer rather than using LLVM as a JIT > compiler? Customers/clients unhappy with the inefficiency, extra CPU and RAM usage, and performance penalty of JIT. They require a faster, more efficient solution. The solution is to fully compile programs to native code at the time of

Hi all, I''m looking at changing the operatingsystemrelease fact for Red Hat. Linux currently just uses the kernel release as the operating system release, but I''ve got a client who wants the release to have both the specific distro (e.g., AS or EL) and the release (e.g., 3 or 4). Will this particularly annoy anyone? Anyone want to help make the release string work on

Hi all, So I have finally finished the v3 of reflink for ocfs2. The biggest change is that we support 64bit cluster offset now(Thank Mark and Joel for it). [View] http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=tma/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refcount [Pull] git://oss.oracle.com/git/tma/linux-2.6.git refcount The general information for reflink, please see http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/DesignDocs/Reflink.