search for: veryfying

Launching the application installer it works well but at the end it reports this message Impossible veryfying editor's file 'C:\windows\temp\VSD19f7.tmp\dotnetfx\langpack.exe' Choose Ok to retry download. Is there a solution? Thank you. bye

Hi! I installed wine in Kubuntu and afterwords i installed steaminstaller from my CSs CD! I could execute both steam and CSs very fast and without problems. I veryfied that my ATI drivers were properly installed, which they where. So no problems there :) ! Then I configured my video options in CSs (16:10 1680 x 1050) and started up the game, but then I got some strange problem with the screen.

Hello, My name is Felipe I succesfuly installed Shorewall 4.4.20.3 in Ubuntu 10.04, This installation is for controlling the access into the local Network, My question is if it is possible to make a conecction WAN to LAN using Terminal Name?? i have been searching in goolge but i didnt find an answer!!!! For example we have IP Public into shorewall with 2 interfaces, and in the LAN we have 3

Here are my (little) view regarding shares accesses. I write that to clarify things. And it could really be of-topic as Louis seems to have gave solution. There are 2 levels of authorisation for accessing shares: the share level and FS level. For Sysvol I would keep everyone or replace it by "authenticated users" in paranoid mode as the latter refuse non-authenticated users. They are

...or did adding a full stop. I even added the quotes to the string that whirlpool digested - didn't change anything. I know I could try changing the input until kingdom come without finding the error, so I left it at that. I could however verify (using a few tests, if you want to call that "veryfying") that the results were the same on both i386 and sparc64 plattforms - but since the port was taken from NetBSD, there aren't any surprises in that. Just to make things a little more complex, I encoded "Telegraph Road" off one of my Dire Straits CDs to mp3, hashed that with dige...

Hai Viktor, > > Before posting my share permissions, can you please elaborate what you > mean with "have you removed authenticated users from your share"? I > never had any rights for "authenticated users" on any of my shares. Ah sorry, yes, that was "everybody" ( my error ) keep it > > Maybe I'm setting up shares in the wrong way? >

Hello everybody, I am using Ubuntu 12.04LTS server running samba server on it. I have problem accessing the shares from Windows XP with \\servername\share, but no problem accessing \\ip\share. How can i correct this problem?. I have tried every single example found on google with no good results. Any help will be appreciated. Sincerely, Carlos R. Pena My smb.conf [global] workgroup =

On 17/11/15 16:57, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the > AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without > any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in > computer mode*. In user mode, it all works just fine. > > Viktor > > On 17.11.2015

Hi Mathias, Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in computer mode*. In user mode, it all works just fine. Viktor On 17.11.2015 17:19, mathias dufresne wrote: > Here are my (little) view regarding shares accesses. I

On 17.11.2015 18:05, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 17/11/15 16:57, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> Hi Mathias, >> >> Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the >> AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without >> any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in >> computer mode*. In user

Let me guess. You accessing your server like : \\servername\netlogon of \\servername\sysvol Well thats protected by windows these these days. Try with \\servername.domain.tld\netlogon or \\servername.domain.tld\sysvol Does that work? Yes, There is a whole chaper of this on the list somewhere.. Best is to read howto override this. https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 and for you

apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC. So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be trying to track the failure in that code? In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows: libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000) libc.so.6 =>