search for: vclark

...15:03, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(314) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/07/05 14:15:03, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(848) Domain=[DOMAIN1] NativeOS=[Unix] NativeLanMan=[Samba] [2002/07/05 14:15:03, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(858) sesssetupX:name=[VCLARKE] <---- this *is* the username I'm successfully logged into Windows with, and is also a valid Unix user on the server; using 'security = user' worked fine. [2002/07/05 14:15:09, 1] smbd/password.c:server_validate(1191) password server 172.17.1.2 rejected the password [2002...

...= lo eth0 wins support = no wins server = 172.17.1.2 character set = ISO8859-15 client code page = 850 veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/ [vicky] comment = Linux home directory for Vicky browseable = no valid users = vclarke root Administrator path = /home/vclarke read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] comment = PC home directories path = /share/pchomes/%S read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0750...

...39;t work; 'no' does work wins server = 172.17.1.2 character set = ISO8859-15 client code page = 850 veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/ [vicky] comment = Linux home directory for Vicky browseable = no valid users = vclarke root Administrator path = /home/vclarke read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] comment = User home directory path = /share/pchomes/%S read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0750...

...39;t work; 'no' does work wins server = 172.17.1.2 character set = ISO8859-15 client code page = 850 veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/ [vicky] comment = Linux home directory for Vicky browseable = no valid users = vclarke root Administrator path = /home/vclarke read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] comment = User home directory path = /share/pchomes/%S read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0750...

...eetings from Germany! -Torsten ===================================== = And the music's gonna make me fly = = --- without fear and without pain = = Meat Loaf - Heaven can wait = ===================================== > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Vicky Clarke [mailto:vclarke@frontier.co.uk] > Gesendet am: Montag, 12. August 2002 18:04 > An: samba@lists.samba.org > Betreff: [Samba] add user script going Horribly Wrong (tm) > > Hi, > > I've tried to set up automated user addition and deletion on > our Samba > server, but something'...

...9;t work; 'no' does work) wins server = 172.17.1.2 character set = ISO8859-15 client code page = 850 veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/ [vicky] comment = Linux home directory for Vicky browseable = no valid users = vclarke root Administrator path = /home/vclarke read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] comment = User home directory path = /share/pchomes/%S read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0750...

...39;t work; 'no' does work wins server = 172.17.1.2 character set = ISO8859-15 client code page = 850 veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/ [vicky] comment = Linux home directory for Vicky browseable = no valid users = vclarke root Administrator path = /home/vclarke read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] comment = User home directory path = /share/pchomes/%S read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0750...

Having got a little further through the debugging session, I now read in the manpage for smb.conf that Windows NT doesn't supply a password to Samba. My backup server is WinNT and needs access to the Samba shares to back the data up; it's also the PDC, so is theoretically the source for password confirmations. How does this one work - can a PDC in fact supply a password for itself, or

From the manpage for smb.conf: You may list several password servers in the password server parameter, however if an smbd makes a connection to a password server, and then the password server fails, no more users will be able to be authenticated from this smbd. This is a restriction

I'm seeing errors accessing samba shares accompanied by the message "The local device name is already in use" fairly frequently on several machines around our building. It doesn't seem to happen with NT shares. Our NT logon script executes a 'net use' command to map the Samba share as a network drive; is this just a symptom of a share already being manually mapped on

In a samba share with domain authentication on an ext2 filesystem, is there any sensible way to allow creation of folders, files and so on inside it other than making the share directory world-writeable on the Unix system? If not, are there other options for achieving this? I know I've heard about a Linux filesystem which has NT-style ACLs, but I've also heard that it's