search for: urke

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:59:16 -0500 Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: <SNIP> > My guess is that one of the bootstrap samples had a different > selection of countries, so factor(Country) had different levels, and > that would really mess things up. > > You'll need to decide how to handle that: If you are trying to > estimate the coefficient for

On 13/01/2024 8:58 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:59:16 -0500 > Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > <SNIP> > >> My guess is that one of the bootstrap samples had a different >> selection of countries, so factor(Country) had different levels, and >> that would really mess things up. >> >> You'll

fstest generic case 266 272 281 trigger hanging issue when umount. I use 266 to describe the root cause. ``` 49 _dmerror_unmount 50 _dmerror_mount 51 52 echo "Compare files" 53 md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch 54 md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch 55 56 echo "CoW and unmount" 57 sync 58 _dmerror_load_error_table 59 urk=$($XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite

Sorry, please pause this patch review. When I was investigating fstest generic failed case 347 361, I found the wake_up() action should move out the 'if()' area. The correct way is calling wake_up() unconditionally. Thanks, Heming On 4/21/23 4:36 PM, Heming Zhao wrote: > fstest generic case 266 272 281 trigger hanging issue when umount. > > I use 266 to describe the root cause.

...e is not a multiple of replacement length > > > ########################################## > Score=c(345,564,467,675,432,346,476,512,567,543,234,435,654,411,356,658,432,345,432,345, 345,456,543,501) > > Country=c("Italy", "Italy", "Italy", "Turkey", "Turkey", "Turkey", "USA", "USA", "USA", "Korea", "Korea", "Korea", "Portugal", "Portugal", "Portugal", "UK", "UK", "UK", "Poland", "Pol...

fstest generic cases 266 272 281 trigger hanging issue when umount. I use 266 to describe the root cause. ``` 49 _dmerror_unmount 50 _dmerror_mount 51 52 echo "Compare files" 53 md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch 54 md5sum $testdir/file2 | _filter_scratch 55 56 echo "CoW and unmount" 57 sync 58 _dmerror_load_error_table 59 urk=$($XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite

On Tuesday 01 April 2008 10:47, David Greene wrote: > > reg iterators will return everything that is in the function. If the > > implicit operands haven't been added to the machieninstrs yet, then they > > won't be returned. > > Hmm...this is definitely NOT true in my copy. During register allocation > these implicit defs are not returned. By then the

On Mon, 24 Jun, at 10:27:52AM, Thomas B?chler wrote: > Am 24.06.2013 04:10, schrieb Gene Cumm: > > In trying Syslinux-6.00 bios/core/pxelinux.0 with a 3.0.21 kernel, I got" > > > > "No linux boot function registered for firmware > > Booting kernel failed: Bad file number" > > > > Using Syslinux-5.10, the same kernel/initrd succeeds. > >

What's a reliable way to prefer one patterns over another? I have two patterns with different predicates. Pattern A has a very general predicate to catch a wide variety of store instructions. Pattern B has a narrower predicate meant to catch very specific store instructions that would also satisfy the predicate for Pattern A. We used to match Pattern B just fine but after changing .td

On Monday 06 April 2009 13:31, David Greene wrote: > What's a reliable way to prefer one patterns over another? I have two > patterns with different predicates. Pattern A has a very general predicate > to catch a wide variety of store instructions. Pattern B has a narrower > predicate meant to catch very specific store instructions that would also > satisfy the predicate for

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 01 April 2008 10:47, David Greene wrote: >>> reg iterators will return everything that is in the function. If the >>> implicit operands haven't been added to the machieninstrs yet, then they >>> won't be returned. >> >> Hmm...this is definitely NOT true in my copy. During register allocation

...am expecting AMD to release the proper driver for my card but the thing that has me is that this odd "CPU overload" only started happening on the 8.41.7 drivers. Before that WoW ran ok, FPS was too low to really play properly but it ran. hoping some other WoWers can comment. regards, Burkey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20071005/f205e75e/attachment.htm

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:03 PM Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> wrote: > > Dont support 'MAP_SYNC' with non-DAX files and DAX files > with asynchronous dax_device. Virtio pmem provides > asynchronous host page cache flush mechanism. We don't > support 'MAP_SYNC' with virtio pmem and xfs. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:03 PM Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> wrote: > > Dont support 'MAP_SYNC' with non-DAX files and DAX files > with asynchronous dax_device. Virtio pmem provides > asynchronous host page cache flush mechanism. We don't > support 'MAP_SYNC' with virtio pmem and xfs. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at

On Thu, July 20, 2017 8:07 am, Peter Larsen wrote: > On 07/16/2017 12:30 PM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >> - The firewall is placed in front of the cluster. >> - After you have found a safe base for this, you freeze it. > > Sorry, but this statement really urks me in a wrong way. Why do you > think a firewall is the ONLY part that needs to be provide security? > That's

Halo Valeri, let's think about what a hpc cluster is for. Second, one should always ask the question where security is to be applied,then one can come to the following decision: - The firewall is placed in front of the cluster. - After you have found a safe base for this, you freeze it. - We have a rsync of centos and epel on the head node. >From here, we can always reinstall a node

On Monday 06 October 2008 11:47, David Greene wrote: > > As far as the approach goes, here's a counterproposal that is a bit > > less complex. I suggest adding a single DenseMap<Instruction*, > > unsigned> to Mem2reg. If there is an entry in this map for a load/ > > store instruction, it would store the instruction's index in its basic > > block.

On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 17:41 +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 27.11.2014 12:18, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 11:02 +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > >> On 21.11.2014 13:50, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>> Package: xen-utils-common > >>> Version: 4.4.0-1 > >>> Severity: important > >>> Tags: patch > >>> >

David, Would you mind documenting what you did with AddedComplexity for the 'less fortunate' on the wiki? Thanks, Justin. On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:47 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Monday 06 April 2009 13:31, David Greene wrote: > > What's a reliable way to prefer one patterns over another? I have two > > patterns with different predicates.

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 08:37:01AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:03 PM Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Dont support 'MAP_SYNC' with non-DAX files and DAX files > > with asynchronous dax_device. Virtio pmem provides > > asynchronous host page cache flush mechanism. We don't > > support