search for: uppgrade

Hello I saw that samba 2.2.5a is out. Whats the difference with 2.2.4? Is there currently any problem with 2.2.4 or 2.2.5a? I want to uppgrade my server from 2.2.3a so i want to know if there are any thing that i should be prepared for. Ive heard that 2.2.4 had some printing problems? Is this true? /Alexander

Hi! I?m having trubbles with the speed on my samba server, I just uppgraded to gigabit (Realtek 8169 NIC) at home when i copy stuff from the samba server i get around 5-6Mb/sec and if i use ftp to access the same file on the same server i get almost 30Mb/sec does anyone have a clue what causes this problem? When i used my old 3com 905c for the local net i got normal 100Mb...

Hi, I'm new to the list so bare with me! Running samba-3.0.12 on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE. I did uppgrade from 3.0.10 to 3.0.12 and now lots of my users have problems accesing their home folder on that server. If I look at the users procceses they are running more than one smbd and they are on verry high load, in top: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 12045 us...

Hi, I'am running a small samba server at work with 10+ users in the domain (all of them added with W2KSP1 and 2.2.3 or 2.2.4). I uppgraded to 2.2.5 a while back and has not experienced any problem with it, but when I try to add a newly installed W2KSP1 client to the domain I get the following entries in the log file: Sep 10 13:29:55 linus smbd[17681]: [2002/09/10 13:29:55, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(384) Sep 10 13:29:55 linus...

...g a W2KSP1 client to a Samba PDC (2.2.5). > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'am running a small samba server at work with 10+ users in the domain > > > (all > > > > of them added with W2KSP1 and 2.2.3 or 2.2.4). I uppgraded to 2.2.5 a > > > while > > > > back and has not experienced any problem with it, but when I > > > try to add a > > > > newly installed W2KSP1 client to the domain I get the following > > > entries in > > > > the log file: > > &gt...

...roubles so I though maybe someone here could give me some help. We have a Linux server with a Scsi Raid 5 disk. We use it as Samba and Nfs server for Windows and Linux clients. It also exports through Samba a disk mounted through Nfs from another Linux server. Everything was working fine until we uppgraded the server to RedHat 7.2. Now, after e few hours/minutes, some smbd process go to uninterruptible state, the load of the server goes very high and clients start to freeze. Nothing else than a reboot can get the server back again. Which mean one or two reboot a day... Any help on this ? Thanks, -...

Hi! We have a production cluster AIX 5.1 (HACMP) with Samba (2.99 alpha) as auth today, it handles aroud 800-900 users, we have no local users on the box except the one that must be there... But now we need to uppgrade. Now im testing the 3.0.4 I have manged to get samba to work in a native mode AD. with one domain the problem is when i try to use the production domain, thats runs in mixed mode and having ROOT\ and JLL\ and 2 netbios names jll.jllad.se = JLL jllad.se = ROOT from wbinfo -g |grep Domain Users...

...and my first post is about a problem i ran into. I installed a mailserver on a RaspberryPi. It works mostly well, using dovecot 2.1.7. (exim4 4.8 (not in use, smtp direct to Provider), fetchmail 6.3.21, RasPi 3.12.28+, Roundcube (no version known) - the whole system went through an apg-get update/uppgrade this night to look if a known problem already been fixed. When getting bigger Attachments (not sure if it occurs by smaller too, but bigger attachments are normally "to open" and often fail) Not all of them, but much. Unpredictable when it occurs. These Attachments are shown with less si...

Im trying to run this program called Thinkboxx and wen it tryes to comunicate over the comm port it hangs. Here are som output to read. earlier on i get: Call kernel32.VirtualAlloc(43050000,00001000,00001000,00000004) ret=0058557c Ret kernel32.VirtualAlloc() retval=43050000 ret=0058557c thats from vhere the com port gets an virtual memory space, i think. and in the end i have: Call