search for: uphills

I am running OpenSolaris build 134 on a T1000 (Sparc). It has been an uphill battle getting this far. Many of the commands I find in the various documentation won''t work for me. ------------------------------------------------------------ steve@t1000:~# pfexec pkg install xvm-gui Creating Plan pkg: ''xvm-gui'' matches multiple packages

I am having uphills trying to install P'shop 7 under Wine on a Mac. My initial problem is that I can't understand the log output! Is there a howto for less-than-knowledgeable users about interpreting the logs? And common solutions to errors, too?

I'm just curious to see if I'm fighting an uphill battle that isn't really necessary. Is anyone out there NOT using PAM, running Samba and winbind on Solaris 8? Maybe my problems are related to my attempt to keep it simple and not use pam. -Dan Daniel J. Thomas Systems Administrator Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, MD Balt: (443) 778-7924 Wash: (240)

hi everyone i'm having trouble figuring out why i'm getting NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS errors, i have two samba ad domain controllers running on raspberry pi's i think it a recent problem since an upgrade because i was able to list domain users on a joined member server but now getent only lists local users, i've read that the problem might be due to avahi which i stop with

In light (pun not intended) of the announcement here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MirSpec what does this mean for LightDM being a viable free desktop display manager. The diagram shows the system compositor as being launched by LightDM in much the same way X is, and the plan looks very much like what we would do for Wayland. Is MIR going to be a hard dependency? Is Wayland support going to be dropped

OK. So here's my case: I've been trying to get Samba configured to run as a domain controller for about a month now. The job is to add a domain controller to a workgroup of Windows XP Pro machines. It has been a long uphill struggle with lots of hope but little progress. Just when I was about to give up on Samba, someone suggested that I try in with a few other versions of Windows. 95,

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Mind you, I've never been complete thrilled with ssh-agent. > > Then look into extending it, or writing a new one which does what you > want. My underlying, long-term concern with ssh-agent is my underlying concern with private SSH keys. There's currently no way to

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:32 PM, <nkavv at physics.auth.gr> wrote: > Hi Justin and all, > > you've mentioned that you used an easy "trick" for defining an infinite > register file in the backend. > The original PTX back-end just didn't perform register allocation. All registers emitted in the assembly were virtual registers, mapped to a consecutive range.

Renato Golin <renato.golin at arm.com> writes: > On 15 February 2011 22:14, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: >> That's why we use { i8, i16 }.  It's not by accident.  We do adhere to >> the Itanium ABI. > > Oh, I see. But the padding is not a problem, it could be [3 x i8] or { > i8, i16 }, it doesn't matter, since it's never

> On Nov 1, 2019, at 3:41 AM, Dmitriy Borisenkov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > A summary of the discussion so far. > > It seems that there are two possible solutions on how to move forward with non 8 bits byte: > > 1. Commit changes without tests. Chris Lattner, Mikael Holmen, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Jesper Antonsson support this idea. > James Y

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:18 PM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 08:44, Whisperity via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > There *are* open-source Discord clients, 3rd party tools and the like. > > This is a big uphill fight that is rarelly worthy. Not to mention > privacy guarantees and terms and conditions

Hi Justin and all, you've mentioned that you used an easy "trick" for defining an infinite register file in the backend. Does this involve defining a single dummy register, and then adding this dummy reg to each register class? Is anything more needed? I refer to the RegisterInfo.td file, as e.g: llvm-3.0.src/lib/Target/PTX/PTXRegisterInfo.td I'm (just starting)

Charles Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com> writes: > Huh? Intel CC supports the MSVC++ ABI. Zortech (Digital Mars) supports > it, too (though the guy who wrote it isn't too proud of that fact--or > the fact that he even wrote that compiler to begin with). Heck, even > CodeWarrior supported it (as Howard Hinnant might well remember), > before Metrowerks sold off their x86

> Quite the contrary, knowing that Clang's C++ ABI is completely > incompatible with MS is a maintenance *simplification*. Yes, for example, as explained by Bjarne once, incompatible name mangling schemes for ABIs that are not guaranteed to be 100% binary compatible is a _feature_, not a bug, since it prevents anyone from even beginning to develop a workflow that relies upon linking

On 15 February 2011 22:14, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > That's why we use { i8, i16 }.  It's not by accident.  We do adhere to > the Itanium ABI. Oh, I see. But the padding is not a problem, it could be [3 x i8] or { i8, i16 }, it doesn't matter, since it's never going to be used. But the [8 x i8] that was the original Base type is, and

OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > If you are curious, the remaining non-pedantic warnings are: > > An actual warning that should be fixed: > 4>r:\sdks\llvm\trunk\utils\tablegen\CodeGenDAGPatterns.h(27) : warning > C4099: 'llvm::Init' : type name first seen using 'class' now seen > using 'struct' [snipped some more

On 15 February 2011 23:21, David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > LLVM understands GEP better than ptrtoint/inttoptr, which is why we make > the transform.  Whether you can do this is probably dependent on how you > lower things. We're using only GEPs from start, so we might not hit all the problems you did. I was actually surprised that the change to support

Hi everyone, I'm trying to get dovecot to authenticate against LDAP. And it's a first time to run both dovecot (at all) and OpenLDAP (at all). Versions are below. Dovecot: 1.0.10 OpenLDAP 2.3.40 Dovecot cannot bind to the dn. This may be due to the fact that all google-able documentation doesn't give good examples or anyhting to hint. I'd prefer to use the rootdn by

Greetings - I was just wondering what the state of play was with regard to reading filestore-based quotas when the mailstore is NFS-mounted? Timo mentioned a little while ago that he'd be including it: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022594.html However it isn't in 1.0.1 and isn't mentioned in the release notes for 1.0.2. Is it going to be a 1.1 feature or

Hi list, I get the error "Not unique table/alias" (myql 4.1) when trying eager load 2 classes that use the same base class (not STI) Example: <code> class Wedding < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :bride, :class_name => ''Person'', :foreign_key => ''bride_id'' belongs_to :groom, :class_name => ''Person'',