search for: unwari

I just ordered a new machine that's destined to become a Centos 6 application server for a publishing company, and decided to get one with a 40GB SSD as well as a standard hard drive. I'm thinking that I can put most of the operating system on that drive and have the home directories and whatnot on the regular hard drive. Are there any pitfalls lying in wait for an unwary person like me

Hi, Can I interject something at this point. Can I suggest that invoke/unwind be renamed DWARF_invoke/DWARF_unwind to warn the unwary that if they want lightweight exception handling in their Python/ML/whatever implementation they should use some other method. PS. Kenneth, why don't you just use setjmp/longjmp directly. Or, if you want, I can email you my lightweight versions if you want,

Hi, R users, What may be the best function in R to do variable selection in logistic regression? I have the same number of variables as the number of samples, and I want to select the best variablesfor prediction. Is there any function doing forward selection followed by backward elimination in stepwise logistic regression? Thanks, Annie [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Full_Name: David Firth Version: 1.8.0 OS: Mac OS 10.2.8 Submission from: (NULL) (80.177.12.48) In .Rd files, we use \url{stuff} to refer to a URL on the web. Just as the documentation says. Perhaps this isn't a bug, then, but certainly it's a trap for the unwary. If the construction \link{url{something}} appears in a .Rd file, then Rdconv --type=html ... gets stuck and appears

Greetings, I know that part of the following has been discussed here before but please bear with me. We are running on Solaris versions 2.6 - 9 with a NISplus name service. The permissions on the NISplus password map have been modified to limit read access to the encrypted password field of the passwd table to only the entry owner and the table administrators. See:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! Making some changes in extensions.conf to test the incoming calls so that these are derived to a SIP extension, I found something that draws attention to me: if I test calling to my PSTN line from a mobile phone, when take the call from the SIP extension (softphone), if the mobile phone releases the call, sofphone do it too without problems,

It works for the "yes" case but not for the "without-password" case. The function that checks (auth_root_allowed(auth_method) is special cased for "password". The Pam case sends "keyboard-interactive/pam" which like all other authentication methods except password succeeds. Here is a patch to make it work for me. Please feel free to criticize as

Hi, > How do either of these prevent DWARF exception handling from working? if you throw an exception using your proposed unwind implementation, then it wouldn't be caught by dwarf catch/cleanup regions (eg: invoke). > Would a landing pad expecting to get an exception object from the > exception intrinsics fail to get one in the case of an unwind and > crash? The landing pad

Hi Mark, > Can I suggest that invoke/unwind be renamed DWARF_invoke/DWARF_unwind to > warn the unwary that if they want lightweight exception handling in > their Python/ML/whatever implementation they should use some other method. probably there should be a switch to choose whether codegen should turn unwind/invoke into dwarf or setjmp/longjmp style code. Ciao, Duncan.

On Wednesday 24 Jun 2015, tux john wrote: > hello everyone. > i am using asterisk 11.16 in my home office and i am using fax to email > with it. i am quite happy with the way it works, no problems at all. when > a fax arrives in a particular DID then the system sends it with mailutils > to my email address as pdf. there is not any email address setup in the > system, simply

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:29:50PM +0100, A J Stiles wrote: > On Wednesday 24 Jun 2015, tux john wrote: > > i am using asterisk 11.16 in my home office and i am using fax to email > > with it. > [...] > Beware! This is an exercise fraught with pitfalls for the unwary. Your users > will expect to be able to e-mail any proprietary format and have it appear on > the

Anyone read the rough cuts of this book? I''m interested in checking it out because Bruce Tate''s work is always great. How does it compare to the agile books (2nd edition) in terms of timeliness, difficulty, etc. Thanks! Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear List, I am new to TS-Modeling in R. I would like to fit an ARMA(1,1) model for a balanced panel, running Y on a full set of unit and year dummies using an arma(1,1) for the disturbance: y_it=unit.dummies+yeardummies+e_it where: e_it=d*e_it-1+u_it+q*u_it-1 How can I fit this model in R? arma() does not seem to take covariates (or I don't understand how to specify the function so that

Hi The following gotcha took me a long time to catch: f <- function(x, main0="red", ...){ par(col.axis=main0) plot(x,...) } f(1:10,main="title here") f(1:10,main="title here",main0="blue") I can't quite succinctly summarize why the second case works but the first one doesn't. -- Robin Hankin Uncertainty Analyst National

G'day all, I guess it is still early enough in the year to wish everybody a happy and successful new year. I thought I should report that the installation of the CRAN package rstan regularly fails on my machine (a 64 bit linux box running Xubuntu 15.10). The reason being that I have the 32-bit and the 64-bit architecture of R installed, and my /tmp file is on a partition with about 1Gb

I have following addition : > 1:2 + 1:10 [1] 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 12 I could not understand how R adding those two unequal vector? Any help? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-users, I am using R version 2.10.1 and package foreign version 0.8-39 under windows. When reading .sav-Files (PASW Statistics 18.0.1) containing string variables, these are automatically converted to factors when using option "to.data.frame = TRUE" (see example below). It's clear to me why this happens (the default behaviour of a call to as.data.frame). But this is not

OK, I've read through http://www.llvm.org/docs/ExceptionHandling.html several times now. Let's see if I understand this... 1. Everywhere inside a "try" block, the C++ front-end emits "invoke" instructions instead of "call" instructions. Without any transformations, this "invoke" instruction compiles down to assembly code that doesn't seem to

Hi I am working on a Nested one-way ANOVA. I don't know how to implement R code to test the significance of the random factor My R code so far can only test the fixed factor : anova(lme(PCB~Area,random=~1|Sites, data = PCBdata)) numDF denDF F-value p-value (Intercept) 1 12 1841.7845 <.0001 Area 1 4 4.9846 0.0894 Here is my data and my hand