search for: unwary

...ion server for a publishing company, and decided to get one with a 40GB SSD as well as a standard hard drive. I'm thinking that I can put most of the operating system on that drive and have the home directories and whatnot on the regular hard drive. Are there any pitfalls lying in wait for an unwary person like me when setting this thing up? Further, I suspect that if that thing rattles along like I think it should I'll probably want to add a SSD to my own desktop machine here. Since this computer is already set up with the default Centos 6 partitioning system on a single hard drive (/bo...

Hi, Can I interject something at this point. Can I suggest that invoke/unwind be renamed DWARF_invoke/DWARF_unwind to warn the unwary that if they want lightweight exception handling in their Python/ML/whatever implementation they should use some other method. PS. Kenneth, why don't you just use setjmp/longjmp directly. Or, if you want, I can email you my lightweight versions if you want, Mark. Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi...

Hi, R users, What may be the best function in R to do variable selection in logistic regression? I have the same number of variables as the number of samples, and I want to select the best variablesfor prediction. Is there any function doing forward selection followed by backward elimination in stepwise logistic regression? Thanks, Annie [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Full_Name: David Firth Version: 1.8.0 OS: Mac OS 10.2.8 Submission from: (NULL) (80.177.12.48) In .Rd files, we use \url{stuff} to refer to a URL on the web. Just as the documentation says. Perhaps this isn't a bug, then, but certainly it's a trap for the unwary. If the construction \link{url{something}} appears in a .Rd file, then Rdconv --type=html ... gets stuck and appears to grow and grow and grow... My version of Perl is 5.6.0. A warning in the documentation might be considered a fix for this, although it might reasonably be regarded as goi...

...nctions properly for normal users it has one very negative security implication with respect to root logins: PermitRootLogin is not respected when UsePAM is in effect. I submit that ignoring the PermitRootLogin directive is counter intuitive and that doing so opens a serious security hole for the unwary. As this behavior is documented it can be considered a feature but I would like to propose that this decision be revisited in light of the above. Pam support is now in keyboard-interactive and I have looked at the code enough to realize that the change is not "obvious by inspection". I w...

...and if the other person hangs before I do it, I see that in the my cell phone the call even continues persisting so that if the person of the other endpoint take the earphone again after to hang, we can continue speaking :-D It will be some trick of the telephone companies to collect more with the unwary subscribers? :-D Regards, Daniel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoh6HsACgkQZpa/GxTmHTca+wCfd7ogHaozBDc37DVnT0lrMmYU vYUAni1hp7irLmQNVYt0c3dz0vcaoYVa =UYO9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

...normal users it has one very negative > security implication with respect to root logins: PermitRootLogin is > not respected when UsePAM is in effect. I submit that ignoring the > PermitRootLogin directive is counter intuitive and that doing so opens > a serious security hole for the unwary. As this behavior is documented > it can be considered a feature but I would like to propose that this > decision be revisited in light of the above. What is the problem with PermitRootLogin and UsePAM=yes? It works fine for me. -d -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attach...

Hi, > How do either of these prevent DWARF exception handling from working? if you throw an exception using your proposed unwind implementation, then it wouldn't be caught by dwarf catch/cleanup regions (eg: invoke). > Would a landing pad expecting to get an exception object from the > exception intrinsics fail to get one in the case of an unwind and > crash? The landing pad

Hi Mark, > Can I suggest that invoke/unwind be renamed DWARF_invoke/DWARF_unwind to > warn the unwary that if they want lightweight exception handling in > their Python/ML/whatever implementation they should use some other method. probably there should be a switch to choose whether codegen should turn unwind/invoke into dwarf or setjmp/longjmp style code. Ciao, Duncan.

...my email address as pdf. there is not any email address setup in the > system, simply mailutils. > i would like to add email to fax functionality to the system. could someone > point me to the right direction to see how please? Beware! This is an exercise fraught with pitfalls for the unwary. Your users will expect to be able to e-mail any proprietary format and have it appear on the remote fax machine exactly as though it would on their own printer; and will blame you when it doesn't work because nothing else can read the files produced by an ancient piece of closed-source so...

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:29:50PM +0100, A J Stiles wrote: > On Wednesday 24 Jun 2015, tux john wrote: > > i am using asterisk 11.16 in my home office and i am using fax to email > > with it. > [...] > Beware! This is an exercise fraught with pitfalls for the unwary. Your users > will expect to be able to e-mail any proprietary format and have it appear on > the remote fax machine exactly as though it would on their own printer; and > will blame you when it doesn't work because nothing else can read the files > produced by an ancient piece of...

Anyone read the rough cuts of this book? I''m interested in checking it out because Bruce Tate''s work is always great. How does it compare to the agile books (2nd edition) in terms of timeliness, difficulty, etc. Thanks! Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear List, I am new to TS-Modeling in R. I would like to fit an ARMA(1,1) model for a balanced panel, running Y on a full set of unit and year dummies using an arma(1,1) for the disturbance: y_it=unit.dummies+yeardummies+e_it where: e_it=d*e_it-1+u_it+q*u_it-1 How can I fit this model in R? arma() does not seem to take covariates (or I don't understand how to specify the function so that

Hi The following gotcha took me a long time to catch: f <- function(x, main0="red", ...){ par(col.axis=main0) plot(x,...) } f(1:10,main="title here") f(1:10,main="title here",main0="blue") I can't quite succinctly summarize why the second case works but the first one doesn't. -- Robin Hankin Uncertainty Analyst National

...an_2.9.0.tar.gz In summary, I would like to suggest that 'R CMD INSTALL' deletes architecture specific 'src' subdirectories as soon as they are no longer needed and/or that 'R --arch=name CMD INSTALL --libs-only' installs only libraries for the specified architecture (as an unwary user might expect). Cheers, Berwin ========================== Full address ============================ A/Prof Berwin A Turlach Tel.: +61 (8) 6488 3338 (secr) School of Maths and Stats (M019) +61 (8) 6488 3383 (self) The University of Western Australia FAX : +61 (8) 6...

I have following addition : > 1:2 + 1:10 [1] 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 12 I could not understand how R adding those two unequal vector? Any help? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-users, I am using R version 2.10.1 and package foreign version 0.8-39 under windows. When reading .sav-Files (PASW Statistics 18.0.1) containing string variables, these are automatically converted to factors when using option "to.data.frame = TRUE" (see example below). It's clear to me why this happens (the default behaviour of a call to as.data.frame). But this is not

OK, I've read through http://www.llvm.org/docs/ExceptionHandling.html several times now. Let's see if I understand this... 1. Everywhere inside a "try" block, the C++ front-end emits "invoke" instructions instead of "call" instructions. Without any transformations, this "invoke" instruction compiles down to assembly code that doesn't seem to

Hi I am working on a Nested one-way ANOVA. I don't know how to implement R code to test the significance of the random factor My R code so far can only test the fixed factor : anova(lme(PCB~Area,random=~1|Sites, data = PCBdata)) numDF denDF F-value p-value (Intercept) 1 12 1841.7845 <.0001 Area 1 4 4.9846 0.0894 Here is my data and my hand