Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "unsu".
Did you mean:
uns
2014 Oct 20
3
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
Hi,
016c98c6f virtio: unify config_changed handling
introduced a warning in virtio_ccw which is fixed by the following patch.
Regards,
Sebastian
---
virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
Fix this warning:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning: unused variable ?drv? [-Wunused-variable]
struct virtio_driver *drv;
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/...
2014 Oct 20
3
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
Hi,
016c98c6f virtio: unify config_changed handling
introduced a warning in virtio_ccw which is fixed by the following patch.
Regards,
Sebastian
---
virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
Fix this warning:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning: unused variable ?drv? [-Wunused-variable]
struct virtio_driver *drv;
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/...
2014 Oct 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
...+0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 016c98c6f virtio: unify config_changed handling
> >
> > introduced a warning in virtio_ccw which is fixed by the following patch.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sebastian
> > ---
> > virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
>
> s/unsued/unused/
>
Totally forgot to send an updated version..sry. Here it is.
Regards,
Sebastian
---
virtio_ccw: remove unused variable
Fix this warning:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning...
2014 Oct 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
...+0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 016c98c6f virtio: unify config_changed handling
> >
> > introduced a warning in virtio_ccw which is fixed by the following patch.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sebastian
> > ---
> > virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
>
> s/unsued/unused/
>
Totally forgot to send an updated version..sry. Here it is.
Regards,
Sebastian
---
virtio_ccw: remove unused variable
Fix this warning:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning...
2014 Oct 20
0
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 016c98c6f virtio: unify config_changed handling
>
> introduced a warning in virtio_ccw which is fixed by the following patch.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
> ---
> virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
s/unsued/unused/
>
> Fix this warning:
> drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
> drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning: unused variable ?drv? [-Wunused-variable]
> struct virtio_driver *drv;
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian...
2014 Oct 28
0
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
...t; > >
> > > 016c98c6f virtio: unify config_changed handling
> > >
> > > introduced a warning in virtio_ccw which is fixed by the following patch.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sebastian
> > > ---
> > > virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
> >
> > s/unsued/unused/
> >
>
> Totally forgot to send an updated version..sry. Here it is.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
>
> ---
> virtio_ccw: remove unused variable
>
> Fix this warning:
> drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?...
2014 Oct 20
0
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
...:48:18 +0200 (CEST)
Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 016c98c6f virtio: unify config_changed handling
>
> introduced a warning in virtio_ccw which is fixed by the following patch.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
> ---
> virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
>
> Fix this warning:
> drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
> drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning: unused variable ?drv? [-Wunused-variable]
> struct virtio_driver *drv;
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott at l...
2014 Oct 31
0
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> writes:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:37:58 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:39:12PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
>
>> > virtio_ccw: remove unused variable
>> >
>> > Fix this warning:
>> > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In
2012 Aug 11
1
unsued argument
...it<-nlm(Pfit,c(1.5,500,5,1,0.1),hessian=TRUE)
error code: Error in c(1.5, 500, 5, 1, 0.1) : unused argument(s) (0.1)
the fifth parameter is pb, which goes from Psfcex to alpha, actually L,b and
pa in alpha are used, why not pb?
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/unsued-argument-tp4640034.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2014 Oct 30
2
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:37:58 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:39:12PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > virtio_ccw: remove unused variable
> >
> > Fix this warning:
> > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
> > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning: unused
2014 Oct 30
2
[PATCH] virtio_ccw: remove unsued variable
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:37:58 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:39:12PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > virtio_ccw: remove unused variable
> >
> > Fix this warning:
> > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c: In function ?virtio_ccw_int_handler?:
> > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c:891:24: warning: unused
2017 Jul 24
2
[PATCH v12 6/8] mm: support reporting free page blocks
...page is not seen by the hypervisor. The
> hypervisor only gets those guest pfns which are hinted as unused. From the
> hypervisor (host) point of view, a guest physical address corresponds to a
> virtual address of a host process. So, once the hypervisor knows a guest
> physical page is unsued, it knows that the corresponding virtual memory of
> the process doesn't need to be transferred in the 1st round.
I am sorry, but I do not understand. Why cannot _guest_ simply check the
struct page ref count and send them to the hypervisor? Is there any
documentation which describes the...
2017 Jul 24
2
[PATCH v12 6/8] mm: support reporting free page blocks
...page is not seen by the hypervisor. The
> hypervisor only gets those guest pfns which are hinted as unused. From the
> hypervisor (host) point of view, a guest physical address corresponds to a
> virtual address of a host process. So, once the hypervisor knows a guest
> physical page is unsued, it knows that the corresponding virtual memory of
> the process doesn't need to be transferred in the 1st round.
I am sorry, but I do not understand. Why cannot _guest_ simply check the
struct page ref count and send them to the hypervisor? Is there any
documentation which describes the...
2017 Jul 25
2
[PATCH v12 6/8] mm: support reporting free page blocks
...or. The
> >>hypervisor only gets those guest pfns which are hinted as unused. From the
> >>hypervisor (host) point of view, a guest physical address corresponds to a
> >>virtual address of a host process. So, once the hypervisor knows a guest
> >>physical page is unsued, it knows that the corresponding virtual memory of
> >>the process doesn't need to be transferred in the 1st round.
> >I am sorry, but I do not understand. Why cannot _guest_ simply check the
> >struct page ref count and send them to the hypervisor?
>
> Were you su...
2017 Jul 25
2
[PATCH v12 6/8] mm: support reporting free page blocks
...or. The
> >>hypervisor only gets those guest pfns which are hinted as unused. From the
> >>hypervisor (host) point of view, a guest physical address corresponds to a
> >>virtual address of a host process. So, once the hypervisor knows a guest
> >>physical page is unsued, it knows that the corresponding virtual memory of
> >>the process doesn't need to be transferred in the 1st round.
> >I am sorry, but I do not understand. Why cannot _guest_ simply check the
> >struct page ref count and send them to the hypervisor?
>
> Were you su...
2000 Nov 05
1
suggested bsd-setproctitle.c
Keven Steves,
Can I suggest this minor change. To halt a bit of compiler grumble on
BSD4.3 platforms.
It's complaining about unsued variable "__progname".
I wanted to check with you before committing it incase you had some
other plans in mind (and I know how I hate when others break my code =).
Thanks,
- Ben
--- ../openssh/bsd-setproctitle.c Wed Oct 18 08:11:44 2000
+++ bsd-setproctitle.c Sun Nov 5 16:59:07 200...
2009 May 10
5
Wine 1.1.21, KUBUNTU 9.04 - Please help me with COPY/PASTE
Hello everyone
I am using ChemWindow 6.0 to draw chemical structures, and Microsoft Word to write lab reports.
I installed wine 1.1.21 wine on my system (Kubuntu 9.04) and it successfully launch all applications I need.
But when I draw structures in ChemWindow, I still CAN'T paste them into my Word document.
Please help me to resolve this problem!!!
And I could forget about switching to
2004 Jul 10
0
HFSC simple curves configuration
...for me (the best will be Patrick McHardy who has ported HFSC to linux) - please just three queues.
My situation:
Let say I have 1Mbit of bandwidth. I need three queues:
- prio queue (with low delays, and 100 kbit guaranted rate )
- 1_client queue (with 0 kbit guaranted rate and fairness share the unsued rest of bandwidth)
- 2_client queue (with 0 kbit guaranted rate and fairness share the unsued rest of bandwidth)
Here you can field the queues configuration:
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1:0 hfsc default 100
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 hfsc rt kbit ms kbit ls kbit ms kbit...
2004 Jul 28
1
shaping marked packets
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to shape the following marked packets and
limit them to a speed on 30KBytes. I have read the documentation but I
am unsue of what to do.
iptables -t mangle -A FTP-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK
--set-mark 1
Mark
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2017 Jul 19
2
[PATCH v12 6/8] mm: support reporting free page blocks
On Tue 18-07-17 10:12:14, Wei Wang wrote:
[...]
> Probably I should have included the introduction of the usages in
> the log. Hope it is not too later to explain here:
Yes this should have been described in the cover.
> Live migration needs to transfer the VM's memory from the source
> machine to the destination round by round. For the 1st round, all the VM's
> memory is