search for: unmotiv

...use >> one. >> > > +1 to prefering unsigned types. > I'd appreciate if you guys could provide rational that address the extensive arguments and opinion provided in the C++ community that I tried to summarize in the link above. Otherwise I don't know what to take out of unmotivated "+1". -- Mehdi > >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 9:59 AM James Henderson via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Maybe it's just because I work in code around the binary file formats >>> almost exclusively, but unsigne...

All, I have been thru the archives and all the relevant URL's sent to me. I have sent e-mail to those who have gone before me and are attempting to accomplish the same goal - no one has it working?. Doesn't anyone have a WORKING asterisk pbx that hooks into vonage? Thanks, Jerry Roy 562-305-9545 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > Another privacy plugin that assumes the server operator is unmotivated or > respects your privacy anyways, and won't just skim your password right off > the top to look at your mail. A vault with steel walls and a dirt floor. *SIGH* As usual, you're right on the money, Joseph. I used to let things like this "slide", but somewhat recently...

...unsigned types. >>> >> >> I'd appreciate if you guys could provide rational that address the >> extensive arguments and opinion provided in the C++ community that I tried >> to summarize in the link above. >> Otherwise I don't know what to take out of unmotivated "+1". >> >> -- >> Mehdi >> >> >> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 9:59 AM James Henderson via llvm-dev < >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe it's just because I...

...It encrypts all (incoming and outgoing) mail on the mail server > with a key, which can only be accessed with the users password. So the > server operator is not able to see any mail content, if it's saved on > the hard disk. Another privacy plugin that assumes the server operator is unmotivated or respects your privacy anyways, and won't just skim your password right off the top to look at your mail. A vault with steel walls and a dirt floor. Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

Hi all, I have just been informed that Netboot (http://netboot.sourceforge.net/) can be used to produce PXE boot ROMs. I wonder if anyone has tried running this combination with PXELINUX? This is obviously a really big deal... :) -hpa

Hello dovecot team, at first I want to thank you the awesome dovecot software. I'm currently researching and developing the trees plugin (https://0xacab.org/riseuplabs/trees). In the future I would love to package this software for debian. I run into a problem, which I can not fix by myself, that's why I'm reaching out to you. The plugin is producing a reproducible error, when using

I think the argument supporting the use of bootstrap to determine coefficients, as opposed to just running linear regression on the whole dataset, is the comparison of Rsq and prediction errors between these two approaches - page 1502. There's a substantial difference in favor of the bootstrap approach. -- Michal J. Figurski Gustaf Rydevik wrote: > The url for the mentioned paper is

...ist <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: Re: [trees-plugin] - Dovecot index gets corrupted, > ? when using maildir and recievend and accessing mail at the same time > Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > >> Another privacy plugin that assumes the server operator is unmotivated or >> respects your privacy anyways, and won't just skim your password right off >> the top to look at your mail.? A vault with steel walls and a dirt floor. > > *SIGH* As usual, you're right on the money, Joseph. > > I used to let things like this "slide&qu...

...t;> >>>> I'd appreciate if you guys could provide rational that address the >>>> extensive arguments and opinion provided in the C++ community that I tried >>>> to summarize in the link above. >>>> Otherwise I don't know what to take out of unmotivated "+1". >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mehdi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 9:59 AM James Henderson via llvm-dev < >>>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wr...

...#39;m not a full time LLVM developer and I just use git-svn when needed. +2: The main repository being SVN doesn't prevent people who want to use Git or offline workflows from doing so. These are all reasons why I see the actual switch to git for the main repository to be almost completely unmotivated right now. Whether git advocates want to admit it or not, there is a *very real cost* to switching. We have a healthy and active community (which admitted is not without problems) so at least something is working right. Any discussion of switching to Git should be focused on how it benefits...

On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 18:41 +0000, halfdog wrote: > Hello list, > > I created a page to demonstrate, what would happen when chroot > root directory is writeable. In fact, code execution is possible > already, when only /etc and /bin are writable. I also tried to > escape the chroot jail, but that did not work for non-root users. > > As the 2009 CVE activities mention,

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > You need to separate "what is good for David" from "what is good for > the project". Encouraging decentralized development and long-lived > branches is not actually in the best interest of the project. > > I agree that there are some (quite minor IMO, like offline commits) > advantages that git can

Hi folks, Last night and this morning i''ve hacked up a quick web site for coordinating our development work based on Drupal (http://drupal.org). You can find it at: http://shorewall.dyndns.org I''ve put a few ideas in there - feel free to use the comments or sign up for an account and create your own pages (particularly in the two books about development and web site work).

I'm in the same situation James is in and thus have the same bias but I'll +1 that comment nevertheless. I think I prefer using size_t or the uintX_t types where applicable. Only when I need a signed value do I use one. On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 9:59 AM James Henderson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Maybe it's just because I work in code around the binary

Dan, In reviewing the code, derf came across the DCSearchPoints array in QuadCodeDisplayFragments(), encode.c:696. It looks like it specifies a search order for nearby coded fragments for prediction if there isn't a nearest neighbor. However, the upper search bound is defined as *0*, so the search loop (line 917) is never executed and it always falls back to the last coded fragment.