search for: motiv

Survey: "Motivation of Free/Open Source Software (F/OSS) Developers" We (Marc R?ttig and Carl-Daniel Hailfinger) are currently working on a survey on the motivation of open source developers as part of a "Computer Science and Society" project at the CS department of the University of T?bingen. We...

Dear developers I have just noticed your fantastic work, and I am looking forward to send you dumps of my GeForce 6150, when I get vacation in two weeks. It is an integrated GPU on my Asus A8N-VM CSM, so I hope it will work. The reason I post is, I am wondering what the motivation is for doing nVidia and not ATi? I have read the "FAQ:Why are you doing this?", but it doesn't mention anything about ATi. Is nVidia easier to write drivers for, or do you think AMD will release specs for their GPU's so it would be a waist for time, or are you continuing on...

hi, im all new to linux. i am running ubuntu as my windows was causing me problems so i decided to go to linux. but i bought csi:dark motives before this happened and now i cant play it. i can install it using wine but when it nears to the end of the installation it says "run-time error '429'. ActiveX component cant't cretae object. please can someone tell me what im doing wrong

...PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 1/19/2013 8:36 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> See: >> http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#picking-the-right-data-structure-for-a-task > > Were the "small n" characteristics the main motivation? It is one of the motivations. > Memory-wise, STL classes allow user-defined allocators, so use of things like memory pools should be relatively straightforward. Just wondering... :) Yes, you get some of the benefits that way, but not all of it. -Chris

...:map etc when they are the right solution for the job. I'm trying to understand the reasoning behind the decisions made at the beginning of LLVM. My working assumption is that ADT didn't exist when LLVM started (whereas STL did). In such case, I'm assuming that creation of ADT was motivated by needs of LLVM that STL didn't meet. I'm trying to understand what the needs were and where STL was considered inadequate. Creating a new set of containers is an investment, so, again, I'm assuming that there were specific motives that caused that investment to be made. Benj...

...d, the program should write a 1, if not a 0. Another task is to scrape a ten-digit number from the file after a particular keyword, so that I can map the results. The Programm should create an .txt file ideally. A brief example: Keywords: "surpassed" "achieved", "very motivated" Text1: "Personnel number: 0123456789 The employee has exceeded the set targets and was also otherwise always motivated (...) " So I want that my program for this case, ideally reflects the following (in lines and columns= Personell number;surpassed;achieved; very moti...

...her than a single value. Then the undefined value is simply defined as the set of all values. Our question is simply why LLVM does not use the notion of trap representation of C11 standard to represent the undefined value, rather than using the set-based semantics. We'd like to understand the motivation of the set-based semantics over the trap representation. Thanks. Chung-Kil Hur, Steve Zdancewic & Viktor Vafeiadis. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150317/fa236059/attachment.html&gt...

On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> It is one of the motivations. > > The reason I ask is that STL comes all ready, with containers and algorithms. They may not be optimal for every task, but they do their job and they are part of the standard. There may be some price to pay in terms of performance/memory usage/etc. for a specific application, but...

On 1/19/2013 10:00 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jan 19, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> >> Were the "small n" characteristics the main motivation? > > It is one of the motivations. What were the others? The reason I ask is that STL comes all ready, with containers and algorithms. They may not be optimal for every task, but they do their job and they are part of the standard. There may be some price to pay in terms of perfor...

On 12 September 2016 at 16:23, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > What's the motivation to not build COFF and Mach-O parts? If you don't need > it, you could just leave it. Are you trying to reduce the executable size? It was just easier to remove coff::link() and mach_o::link() from lld.cpp than to add them to our own build infrastructure https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/...

...cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement? > > If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it! I think this is premature, although I consider it a worthy goal. Right now, the only motivation we have for removing "configure+make" is that we don't like having two build systems, but that's not good enough. Some things that CMake needs to do well for it to become the only way to build LLVM/Clang: - Optionally build and install compiler-rt - Optionally build and...

...; discussed at many of the LLVM socials as well. I can see in > > hindsight this might appear to be coming out of nowhere for some, > > but it really is coming from a need we (the board) heard from the > > community. > > This is very useful information. Can you summarize the motivations of > those making the requests (anonymized, of course)? It seems odd that > someone would ask about a 'Code of Conduct' without some particular > impetus, and we obviously want to make sure that we're addressing the > specific requirements that have come up. What infor...

A new one was just added recently - Clang's diagtool. So if you're looking at how to reduce install size, might want to double check that the motivation for adding that is consistent with/not contradictory with your goals/motivations for removing these. (also since several of these are clang binaries/tools - maybe check with the cfe-dev list too) On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:27 PM Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wr...

...clusions. The regressions you've found are probably caused by: > 1) r289813 and r289855 - new matchers in InstCombine > 2) r286814 and r288024 - changes in Inlining cost model > Haven't looked at 2) yet, but I can confirm for 1). Sanjay/Ehsan, can you please explain what's the motivation behind the new transformations you introduced? I'm tempted to ask a revert, but I'd like to understand the motivations first. -- Davide "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more or less solved" -- Henri Poincare

Chris Lattner wrote: > > No, not exactly. I need to find the path with the maximum execution time > > (in assembler for specific processor). Do to so, I must also find paths > > which cannot be executed no matter what input is (like one of the paths > > in the C example). I'm trying to do that using LLVM intermediate > > representation. > > In that case,

...rites and why they are great • Knowledge of search frameworks such as ElasticSearch • Experience with user-centered interaction design • Proficient in both Linux (production) and Mac OSX (development) environments preferred • Familiarity with Amazon Web Services (EC2, S3, EBS, etc.) preferred Motivated Ruby on Rails Expert Pedigree not important, looking for expert in ruby on rails expert could have 2-3 years of solid ruby on rails experience to take ownership of front end, must have design background to be helpful with the UI. This job is a hard core coder, to OWN THE CODE. Everyone touches...

Hello, I was asking what was the motivation for not having the envelope From in the Maildir format, as defined in the qmail spec : "The message is delivered without an extra UUCP- style From_ line, without any >From quoting, and without an extra blank line at the end." which may sound silly since we lose an important pi...

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > int %logsch(int %ih, int %nbh) { > > > entry: > > > %tmp.1 = setlt int %nbh, 0 > > > %ih_addr.1 = select bool %tmp.1, int 10, int %ih > > > %nbh_addr.1 = select bool %tmp.1, int 0, int %nbh > > > %tmp.4 = setgt int %nbh_addr.1, 22528

...ve found are > probably caused by: > > 1) r289813 and r289855 - new matchers in InstCombine > > 2) r286814 and r288024 - changes in Inlining cost model > > > > Haven't looked at 2) yet, but I can confirm for 1). Sanjay/Ehsan, can > you please explain what's the motivation behind the new > transformations you introduced? I'm tempted to ask a revert, but I'd > like to understand the motivations first. > Both r289813 and r289855 add a very small amount of matching (it seems?) compared to the rest of the size of instcombine. How is it that these...

...ewhat neglected by me and I''ve mostly pulled in patches and regenerated the syntax for new languages. I think there are a lot of cool things that could still be done with the bundle (see the TODO list in the README), but I just don''t see myself doing a lot of them without the motivation I once had. Is there anyone on the list with the motivation to take the lead on this project and start adding new features to it? There is a little bit of cruft from the old rspec story runner bundle but all in all the code is reasonably clean with specs behind it. I''m still hap...