search for: unfounded

A couple of my functions that were working last week seem to have been changed over the weekend and no longer work, but I can't understand why not: it seems that objects defined at the start of the function are not located further on in the function, when this worked fine before. An example follows at the end, using the package spatstat, though the problem seems more general. My only guess is

...b/mail server with a replicated mysql database. The current live server is a dual Xeon 2.8Ghz. Would I do better to get another Xeon server or an Opteron based server? My concerns are compatibility of the database and the SSL certificate currently running on the Xeon machine. Are these concerns unfounded? TIA Mike

...d data from an existing database and create a development db with the schema and data. Is this possible? - I have heard of doing a ''schema dump'', what about a data dump. The data in the existing db is important - I worry that doing something could delete the data. Is this fear unfounded? Chris. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all, I need to build samba 3.6.1 on a RedHat redhat-release-5Server-5.6.0.3 linux machine but cannot install it to the default directories because the machine is centrally managed... I am using the following configure command: ./configure --prefix=/app/radius/samba/ --with-configdir=/app/radius/samba/conf --with-privatedir=/app/radius/samba/private --disable-cups and I am unable to run

...th of an object 'x' - the length that for instance .subset(x) and .subset2(x) see? An obvious candidate would be to use: .length <- function(x) length(unclass(x)) However, I'm concerned that calling unclass(x) may trigger an expensive copy internally in some cases. Is that concern unfounded? Thxs, Henrik

...stance .subset(x) and .subset2(x) see? An >> obvious candidate would be to use: >> >> .length <- function(x) length(unclass(x)) >> >> However, I'm concerned that calling unclass(x) may trigger an >> expensive copy internally in some cases.? Is that concern unfounded? >> >> Thxs, >> >> Henrik >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at...

...these have broken anything else, but let me know if it has. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Software is largely a service industry operating under the persistent but unfounded delusion that it is a manufacturing industry." -- Eric S. Raymond

...ity, and if you have the time: why did you find those incantations suspicious?) Memory is fuzzy and no ECC in my wetware :) but as I seem to recall it had to do with my fears over filenames not being standardized enough / this interfering with the update-alternatives mechanism. May well have been unfounded (I don't recall), may well have bitten me at some point (I don't recall either). So ... ?\_(?)_/? Glad you have what you want working as "The rest is details." Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org

J5K <junk5 at klunky.co.uk> wrote: >The four Dlls set to Native only are: >atmlib.dll (does Wine include this?) >gdiplus.dll >AdobeOwl.dll (This is not included with Wine, it will default to native) >AdobeOwlCanvas.dll (This is not included with Wine, it will default to native) > >i) Are any of these dlls included in wine (perhaps gdiplus which i can set to builtin to

Hello, I''m new to rails and I''m trying to wrap my heads around how to spec controllers using RSpec (using rails 3rc1 and rspec 2.0.0.beta.19). The problem I''ve run into is when I want to test that my controllers respond with a 404 for unfound records. Whenever I run the spec, the ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound exception is not caught by rails, causing the spec

...leased after that year supports that level, and that's not true. I think for manylinux, it's different, and it actually works out there. No one is building a new GNU/Linux distribution that is based on glibc 2.12 today, for example. But not so much for x86 CPUs. If you think my worry is unfounded, then a year-based approach sounds compelling. Thanks, Florian

...ages, see https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/issues/1281) In the present case, an important and unanswered question is (cited from Henrik): >>> However, I'm concerned that calling unclass(x) may trigger an >>> expensive copy internally in some cases. Is that concern unfounded? If no copy is made, length(unclass(x)) beats length(setattr(..)) in all scenarios. > Doing so > in packages is particularly unhelpful to the whole community - packages > should only use the public API as documented. > > Similarly, getting a physical address of an object to ha...

...the interface on the upstream channel? I would think that if tc could simply re-order packets, with a small queue maintained for lower priority traffic, then the throughput limits would not have to be defined...allowing the shaper to rise and fall with the Powerboost oddness. This idea is wholly unfounded, however, so please illuminate me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and you''ll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics throu...

...ggressive optimizations altogether might be a sledgehammer approach). I'm geting this nagging feeling that there may need to be a mechanism where special annotations need to be placed in LLVM instruction stream to ensure safe optimizations.... Someone please tell me my concerns are totally unfounded, atleast for LLVM :-) - Vipin

...lldb and remote JIT for ideas.  I worry that I will not be able to pre-link on the host side because the host cannot(?) know the final memory layout of code on the client side, especially when there are multiple plugins being loaded in different combinations on the host and client.  Is that an unfounded worry? I suppose it is also possible to share re-locatable machine code (ELF?) and only use client-side embedded LLVM for linking duties? Does that simplify things appreciably?  I was under the impression that if I can compile and embed the LLVM linker then embedding LLVM's codegen librari...

...as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as well for new people. I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker). My fear (unfounded as it probably is) is that I'll make a complete fool out of myself asking a dumb question / proposing a stupid idea, tarishing what little reputation I might have had. I know from others I've talked to over the years this isn't a sentiment that I alone feel! So +1 from me for anything...

I don''t know if anyone is using this but I just fixed a bunch of bugs, some big ones, and moved this project to RubyForge SVN servers. So you can get it here now: script/plugin install http://facebooker-mq.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/facebooker-mq/ This is working great for me on a couple of projects. Here is the README Updated: 3/14/2008 Purpose: The purpose of FacebookerMQ is to

...ct 1 15:23:24 somehost sshd[18603]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user someuser by (uid=0) Oct 1 15:23:24 somehost sshd[18603]: User child is on pid 18610 -- Eldon Koyle -- Men often believe -- or pretend -- that the "Law" is something sacred, or at least a science -- an unfounded assumption very convenient to governments.

As far as I can see, here is a summary of the situation, and there's a point to this, but I only make it in step (4), needing the first three steps to set up a background to keep my own thoughts clear: 1) Fedora (via Jakub) shows it's possible to patch OpenSSH. 2) OpenVPN (via gert) shows it's possible to build a 'shim' of sorts that allows code to work with libreSSL and

...I worry that I >> will not be able to pre-link on the host side because the host cannot(?) >> know the final memory layout of code on the client side, especially when >> there are multiple plugins being loaded in different combinations on the >> host and client. Is that an unfounded worry? >> >> I suppose it is also possible to share re-locatable machine code (ELF?) >> and only use client-side embedded LLVM for linking duties? Does that >> simplify things appreciably? I was under the impression that if I can >> compile and embed the LLVM linker t...