search for: unduli

Hi all! One of these days I'm going to upgrade my centos 5.7 box (which is currently configured with raid-1 on two drives) to 6.x. i've been given to believe that I should be able to do a fresh install on top of the existing raid setup, i.e., without having to re-create the raid array, but just use the existing setup. and somewhere in the last few days (in this list I think) someone

I have already deployed a fax server and am about to deploy a backup system for this host at our off-site facility. It struck me that I have given no thought to securing the serial port to unauthorized access. The modem is a Multi-Tech MT5634ZBA which supports data as well as fax. So this poses the same type of risk, if not to the same degree, as an ssh or telnet port but without the

Hi All, I've been going through the bug queue and there's a number that have been waiting for reporter feedback for a long time (in one case 7+ months). Would anyone consider it unduly harsh if I took an axe to the queue and closed any bugs (ie the unconfirmed or WORKSFORME type) that have been waiting for reporter feedback for more than, say, 3 months? (Unless there's a documented

1. THANK YOU! to all who make R possible. It is a real joy to use. 2. The following may or may not be (minor) bugs, but I thought I'd mention them anyway: (a) model.matrix() seems unduly finicky: it seems to accept only "simple" variable names (x1, but not, say, dframe$x1 or I(x1^2), for example) in its argument. model.frame(), however, has no problem with these. (b) If A is a

(Reply directly, as I''m not subscribed here.) As you may have seen, ARC recently approved my case to remove the ancient sbpro driver Solaris. I''m intent on doing that, because it really helps with our OSS integration effort, which I''m now leading. The problem is, will this impact qemu? I''m not sure of the answer. I *think* qemu emulates an older ESS1370

(Reply directly, as I''m not subscribed here.) As you may have seen, ARC recently approved my case to remove the ancient sbpro driver Solaris. I''m intent on doing that, because it really helps with our OSS integration effort, which I''m now leading. The problem is, will this impact qemu? I''m not sure of the answer. I *think* qemu emulates an older ESS1370

Dear Speex community, I am having problems to get the Speex Decoding API to work properly in our project. I am working in an embedded project with a very limited RAM and Flash memory and would like to use Speex encoded files to save memory while having good voice sounds in our speakers. I have developed a Windows-based tool to convert WAV files to Speex files in packets of 160 bytes (we are

Dear List, We have noticed a variety of reproducible conditions working with sparse files on multiple servers under load with CentOS 6.4. The short story is that processes that read / write sparse files with large "holes" can generate an IO storm. Oddly, this only happens with holes and not with the sections of the files that contain data. We have seen extremely high IO load for

Hello, I have used the functions agnes and cutree to cluster my data (4977 objects x 22 variables) into 8 clusters. I would like to refine the solution using a k-means or similar algorithm, setting the initial cluster centres as the group means from agnes. However my data matrix has NA's in it and the function kmeans does not appear to accept this? > dim(centres) [1] 8 22 > dim(data)

HFvs> Hello, >>> In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs HFvs> and >> I'm mostly interested in the claim that ZFS is affected. >> I haven't followed this thread carefully, but what exactly is the problem we're >> talking about, and how do we know it impacts ZFS? >> [Something more than a single one-liner in that

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> >> Proposal: >> The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories, >> but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent >> repositories safely usable and give a

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 10:53:09 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Identifying access to errno > > > > > On 23 November 2013 14:14, Hal Finkel <

On 03/09/17 12:29, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 02/09/2017 6:57 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: >> On 03/09/17 03:56, William Dunlap via R-help wrote: >>> Is the reason you want a block comment containing code (as opposed to >>> arbitrary text) that you want to be able to easily run the commented out >>> code? If so the 'if()' construct has the advantage that you

Well I finally managed to get my machines added to my ldap/samba domain. The problem was that I had defined an ou each for Computers and Users. ie dc=base,dc=org | ------ ou = Users | ------ ou = Computers Now the problem was that the nss_ldap library was searching in Users only, and apparently the samba server needs to be able to resolve the Computers tree aswell to add the

Oh, and I forgot a third "_doserrno" for which no amount of documentation lends itself to a consistent description of its behavior. On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com>wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Renato

Hi Stefan, David, This is very interesting stuff - it adds a dimension of error security that Error/Expected can't provide on their own. I think it would be interesting to try to build a tool around this. Did you identify many cases where "real work" (in your example, the nullptr dereference" was being done in an error branch? My suspicion is that that should be rare, but that

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > > Cc: "LLVM" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 10:53:09 AM > > Subject: Re:

[I hope the repost isnt'' "minded". Following the advice of another thread I''ve changed the subject to a question. If I haven''t included important info, please ask. My database is being unduly killed. Jodi] Cheers on-the-Rails-ers, Before I start, I''ve read the ActiveRecord docs on eager loading, but for the life of me, I can''t seem to get

----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Majnemer" <david.majnemer at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>, "LLVM" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 2:37:52 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Identifying access to errno >

Een ingesloten tekst met niet-gespecificeerde tekenset is van het bericht gescrubt ... Naam: niet beschikbaar Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070820/a4fb056c/attachment.pl