search for: undestood

...car Fuentes wrote: >> >> If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed >> LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we supposed to use? > > Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when > distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now) and > because there is no enough perception of the advantages associated with > a change, it is no excuse for you not doing what is most convenient for > your work. We could switch back to CVS... -Chris

...s of time, careful programming, tests and reviews.) > If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed > LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we supposed to use? Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now) and because there is no enough perception of the advantages associated with a change, it is no excuse for you not doing what is most convenient for your work. Or do you think that convincing your managers about the change is more difficult than convincing the LLVM admins? ;-) [sn...

...>> >>> If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed >>> LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we supposed to use? >> >> Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when >> distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now) and >> because there is no enough perception of the advantages associated with >> a change, it is no excuse for you not doing what is most convenient for >> your work. > > We could switch back to CVS... > > -Chris > _______________________________...

...; option. The default valeu for "default devmode' option is' no'. However when declared in [printers] section all works fine. Errors disappear. The device mode were created correctly. Some issues: If the default value for this is option is NO why i need to declare it?! I don't undestood. Can anyone to explain ?! Bye!! -- Att. Lutieri G. B.

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> I can't use git-svn to pull because we use svn on our end. One can't do >> this: >> >> (Upstream) svn <--> git-svn <--> git <--> git-svn <--> svn (Downstream) >> >> because the revisions in the two svn repositories

...iders. > > > > If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be > > improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump > > API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the > > specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent > > SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) > > from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name > > space reservation. So far I don't think it's been well discussed. > > > > One...

...I deleted de .pwl files on the windows machine and got the same behavior. How do I tell Samba to ask for the users' password to connect to one users' home? After reading the docs I googled for a long time now, and haven't found anything that helped me to solve this. Actually, the way I undestood the docs, it should be pretty simple to do this, but I simply can't figure it out! Thanks in advance for any help! Btw, below is my smb.conf. It may be a little messed up now, 'cause I already tried a lot of different options. udo #--------------------------------------------------------...

...it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be > > > > improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump > > > > API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the > > > > specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent > > > > SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) > > > > from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name > > > > space reservation. So far I don't think it's been well discu...

...tation) to do so to benefit any cloud service providers. If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name space reservation. So far I don't think it's been well discussed. One thing in particular I'd like to point out is...

Kindly suggest is this right way to start the cronjob with lock if i've not mis undestood. */5 * * * * /usr/bin/flock -n */etc/webmin/fetchmail/check.pl <http://check.pl> *>* --file /var/log/fetchmaillog* Warm Regards, Anshul Chauhan

This is correct >>that gpupdate tries to copy somethings from \\cch.intra\sysvol and not from \\dc1\sysvol... >>There a no server with name cch.intra, this is just the Realm... No not REALM, but DNSdomain but with the same name as the REALM.   You “should” be able to “ping cch.intra” or browse to \\cch.intra   if not, then your missing dns records.     If you have only

...K, I'm not expert in Samba as AD... > > > You ?should? be able to ?ping cch.intra? or browse to \\cch.intra > > ping yes, browse not. Or better, I can see the shares, but not access > them! > > > if not, then your missing dns records. > > I'm not sure, I undestood your sentence, sorry... > > > If you have only windows users accessing sysvol > > > > Change your sysvol to > > > > > > > >> [sysvol] > > > >>           path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol > > > >>           read on...

...;> >>> If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be >>> improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump >>> API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the >>> specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent >>> SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) >>> from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name >>> space reservation. So far I don't think it's been well discussed. >>> &g...

...y would. The problem with svn is there is no "master branch" in the sense of git. One can't easily keep a private repository of LLVM because svn is by nature centralized. > Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when > distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now) and > because there is no enough perception of the advantages associated with > a change, it is no excuse for you not doing what is most convenient for > your work. Again, the problem is that there is no convenient solution. Everything involves manual diff+patch at some...

...'s just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be >>>>> improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump >>>>> API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the >>>>> specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent >>>>> SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) >>>>> from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name >>>>> space reservation. So far I don't think it's been well di...

...fit any cloud service providers. > > If it's just the implementation of hiding netdev itself needs to be > improved, such as implementing it as attribute flag or adding linkdump > API, that's completely fine and we can look into that. However, the > specific issue needs to be undestood beforehand is to make transparent > SR-IOV to be able to take over the name (so inherit all the configs) > from the lower netdev, which needs some games with uevents and name > space reservation. So far I don't think it's been well discussed. > > One thing in particular I'...

hi users a novice here hoping to grasp fundamentals soon I have a samba+sssd as a client to an AD - I have all the keytabs for a host(I think) but I noticed weird(to me at least) smbclient behavior. when I do: $ smbclient -L swir -U me at AAA.PRIVATE.DOM -k all works, clients sees local samba's shares, when I do: $ smbclient -L swir.private.aaa.private.dom -U pe243 at AAA.PRIVATE.DOM -k

From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special

From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special

Hi all, I have a box running asterisk with T410 connected to a Nortel DMS 100 switch and another box running SER with grandstream phones on it So if there is a call from the pstn it goes from the Nortel to the asterisk and then to the SER box and finally to the phones.if the phone is busy or the number is invalid the * box will first send an ALERT message to the Nortel and say the call is going on