llvm dev - Feb 2011 - [LLVMdev] Official git mirroring of llvm, clang, lldb, test-suite, etc.?

On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>> 
>> If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed
>> LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we supposed to
use?
> 
> Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when
> distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now) and
> because there is no enough perception of the advantages associated with
> a change, it is no excuse for you not doing what is most convenient for
> your work.
We could switch back to CVS...

-Chris

lol

On Feb 1, 2011, at 0:00, Chris Lattner wrote:
> 
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed
>>> LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we
supposed to use?
>> 
>> Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when
>> distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now) and
>> because there is no enough perception of the advantages associated with
>> a change, it is no excuse for you not doing what is most convenient for
>> your work.
> 
> We could switch back to CVS...
> 
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> writes:
> lol
LOL, yes, but svn is not much better than cvs.  It makes doing release
branches slightly easier, but that's about it.  svn in no way tackles
the real development prodcess.

                              -Dave
> On Feb 1, 2011, at 0:00, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>> 
>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed
>>>> LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we
supposed to use?
>>> 
>>> Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when
>>> distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now)
and
>>> because there is no enough perception of the advantages associated
with
>>> a change, it is no excuse for you not doing what is most convenient
for
>>> your work.
>> 
>> We could switch back to CVS...
>> 
>> -Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

On Feb 1, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Garrison Venn wrote:
> lol
Please don't make posts like this to the list.

John.