search for: umbrella

...So even if the objects you pass in to container.collection= are completely different except for their ids, the collection remains unchanged. So that''s a weird behavior, too. Why is it like that? Here''s my simplified test case, part of a new Web 2.0 app, Rain''d. :-) The umbrellas are all named, and we want to make sure that each person has uniquely-named umbrellas. class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :umbrellas def validate errors.add("umbrellas", "must be uniquely named") unless no_duplicate_names? end def no_duplic...

...e know what might have happened? Because the when changing the trellis settings, these should remain in the new state until you close R right..? # Change settings for the boxplot appearance new.dot=trellis.par.get("box.dot") new.rectangle=trellis.par.get("box.rectangle") new.umbrella=trellis.par.get("box.umbrella") new.symbol=trellis.par.get("plot.symbol") new.strip.background=trellis.par.get("strip.background") new.strip.shingle=trellis.par.get("strip.shingle") new.dot$pch="|" new.dot$col="black" new.rectangle$col=&qu...

...lassifier cannot be used together with u32. For example, now, you cannot match a mark of 0x90 and a destination port of 80. I know you can do it with iptables to do the marking, but if you use Jamal actions to apply mark to policed packets, you need this. All stuff can be found at http://kernel.umbrella.ro/ also. Dave, please consider adding this patch. Stephen, if Dave accepts the patch, please apply the iproute2 patch. Thank you. Signed-off-by: Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE <catab at umbrella.ro> Thank you for you time. --- Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE catab at deuroconsult.ro http://kernel....

Hi all, A short summary: Takumi has done 90% of the work here: https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-submodule and I've been talking to GitHub, and here are the answers to my questions: > 1. How will the umbrella project's auto-increment hook work? Since the umbrella project cannot see the sub-modules' commits without some form of update, there are two ways to do this: P. Per push: Every push (not commit) on all other repositories will trigger a hook that will hit a URL on our server, telling it t...

...t we *must* move from the current schema. It does not scale and the administrative costs are not worth the trouble. So, if we don't go with GitHub, we have to find another way out. The proposal ========== Move to GitHub with N+1 projects: all current LLVM projects + the "llvm-projs" umbrella. The latter will have all other projects as "submodules" with the intent to: 1. Control the history via server hooks updating a unique and auto-increment identifier, which will apply to every commit on its submodules (ie, every other LLVM project). 2. Serve as a reference for releases,...

...r how I am (mis)using it. (i've never used a homegrown lattice panel function before.) i realize that there is an excellent function in Hmisc that generates cool bwplots sans whiskers, but those plots are too fancy for my current needs. all i need are regular boxy bwplots without whiskers (or umbrellas, as i guess they're also called). as a quick fix, i've also tried changing the color of the whiskers to the background color to make the whiskers invisible, but this doesn't work well when the whiskers perfectly align with the border of the box. thank you for your help, alexis diamo...

...lvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Tim’s repo is using "status checks” and not only protected branch. Yep, I think the main benefit (so far) over just protected branches would be that we can also guarantee sane timestamps on master, which should mean we can reconstruct the llvm-project umbrella uniquely when its script goes down or something else weird happens. I think that's a useful ability to have, and can't really think of a way to do it if you can't trust a commit's time (commit-date here, not author-date). I'm not sure how theoretical that issue is though. It w...

...projects in a linear fashion. This makes it more difficult to do bisects, among other things because none of the downstream integration happens until the octopus merge. Let's say that downstream you have a local mirror for each LLVM subproject you work on. Suppose also that you have an "umbrella" repository that holds submodule references to all those local mirrors. Various commits in the umbrella update submodule references: * Update llvm submodule to V * Update clang submodule to G * Don't update any submodules, fix scripts or something * Update compiler-rt submodule to...

...st way, I think. "u32 match mark vvvv mmmm" it''s intuitive but breaks a little the levels, "u32 mark vvvv mmmm" it''s ok but not intuitive.... If you want I can rewrite it if you want. Thank you for your time. Signed-off-by: Catalin(ux aka Dino) <catab at umbrella.ro> --- Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE catab at deuroconsult.ro http://kernel.umbrella.ro/

..., and that provided some continuity with the "git-svn-id:" footers in commit messages. I'm not sure their extension is particularly reusable, though: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/depot_tools.git/+/master/git_number.py I think for LLVM, whatever process updates the umbrella repo should add the sequential IDs to the commit message, and that will help provide continuity across the git/svn bridge. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160630/9a187661/attachment.html>

Hey all, I filed this umbrella bug report to track issues we found in the 2.9 release: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9441 All 2.9 bugs will be listed in there. Also, if there is an open PR, which you think should be fixed in 2.9, please list it in there so that we can review it. Cheers! -bw

...r. It's just "git > commit", no magic. > > Under the multirepo git proposal, this becomes either impossible or > much more complicated. Under the proposal, we have separate git > repositories for each subproject, and we push directly to these. > There's then an umbrella repository, which includes the subproject > repos as git submodules. There's a script which periodically checks > the subproject repos for updates. When it sees an update, it creates > a new commit in the umbrella repository. The script is the only thing > that can create commits...

Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 selectors? Richard. -- ___________________________________________________________________ Recursion: see recursion +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht | | Public key and email address: | |

I''m a new comer. I have problems using tc+htb. I run the following commands, and expect outgoing ssh flow goes into 1:11. But actually it goes into default 12. What''s wrong? tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 2000kbit prio 1 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbit ceil

> On Jul 31, 2016, at 12:36 AM, Justin Lebar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> This suggests what we really want in this case are several updates (one to each repository) on a branch that is then merged in one instant into the umbrella repository. Then the only thing the bots would see would be the merge commit and thus state is synchronized. > > The script that updates the umbrella repo would need to know that the > several updates should all go into one branch that is then merged in > one instant into the umbrella...

Dear All, is any way I can change the colours of the box and umbrella of a bwplot without having to go to the length of: box.rectangle<-trellis.par.get("box.rectangle") box.rectangle$col<-"black" trellis.par.set("box.rectangle", box.rectangle) etc... but straight from the call: bwplot(y ~ x | z, mydata) ? Regards, Federico Ca...

Anybody knows allready programmed libraries either java or C to create/destroy queues?

There is no need to include pv-guest only object files in a kernel not configured to support those. Move Xen's irq.o, xen-asm*.o and pv parts of entry_*.o into CONFIG_XEN_PV sections. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> --- arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 4 +++- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 6 ++++-- arch/x86/xen/Makefile | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7

...sony.com> wrote: > We've since stopped creating the tags, and gotten used to not having > them. We do the 'rev-list --count' trick which mainly gets recorded as > one component of the version number, and it has been working for us. Does that work for sub modules inside the umbrella project? How can you trigger a hook in the umbrella project for commits inside the sub modules? Enough people complained about the sequential number, and I'm trying to solve that problem. I particularly have no use for that at all. We can still do the bundling pushes with the same id by addi...

...2016, at 12:36 AM, Justin Lebar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >>> This suggests what we really want in this case are several updates (one to each repository) on a branch that is then merged in one instant into the umbrella repository. Then the only thing the bots would see would be the merge commit and thus state is synchronized. >> >> The script that updates the umbrella repo would need to know that the >> several updates should all go into one branch that is then merged in >> one instant in...