search for: ultrasparcs

I would also like to help as well. As KMacy knows before i asked a lot of questions for T2 types of servers but unfortunately i have no more access to those kind of hardware as well. I;m willing to participate if a team will be formated.

Hi, System: Netra 1405, 4x450Mhz, 4GB RAM and 2x146GB (root pool) and 2x146GB (space pool). snv_98. After a panic the system hangs on boot and manual attempts to mount (at least) one dataset in single user mode, hangs. The Panic: Dec 27 04:42:11 base ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=300021c1a20: Dec 27 04:42:11 base unix: [ID 521688 kern.notice] [AFT1] errID 0x00167f73.1c737868 UE Error(s) Dec 27

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250 Summary: Attaching to controlling tty is broken on Solaris/UltraSparc Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

Hi, I'm just considering buying two Telecoms grade Sun Netra's to run a lab-based VoIP solution. Not my immediate thoughts as a VoIP platform, but from what I've heard, they can run Linux, and run it well. Only thing is: The Wiki and the Whitepaper just state that Asterisk is for the x86 architecture, but has been compiled to run on PPC architectures. No mention of UltraSparc.

Hi Pawel, > We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! > > My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. there are three sparc buildbots which are hooked up to lab.llvm.org. They are currently idle because no builders have been scheduled to use them: # gcc54 36G 0.5 GHz TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) / 1.5 GB RAM / Sun Netra T1 200 /

We're using Samba 1.9.18p10 on a Linux 2.0.35 box as a fileserver chiefly for software development under VC++. Builds are done from the command line, not the IDE. I'm seeing rather slow build performance under NT4SP3. Build performance is fine under Win95. Build performance is also good when building from Samba 1.9.18p8 running on a Sun UltraSparc. To give some concrete figures, building

Overall the build process for dovecot is very clean. I did however run into a significant problem when it came to locating the mysql libraries, especially when building a 64 bit executable but similar problems occured building a 32 bit executable. I am describing the 64 bit build issues below since that is the worst case scenario. Fixing the 64 bit build will automatically fix the 32 bit

Chris, > FYI, I completely agree that we shouldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? > > -Chris We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. Pawel Wodnicki > On Oct

Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org wrote: >Not only that, but people forget that SPARC is not sold by just Sun. >SPARC is an IEEE standard licensed under "fair and non-discriminatory" >terms. The SPARC ISA and most architectural details are freely >available. Yep - but what is your point with bringing that up? >The _majority_ of my Solaris/SPARC experience in more

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-05-18

I felt like some excitement today[0], and so I ported[1] Andrew's patch for 2.4.10 to 2.4.12 and gave it a try. Everything is solid so far; I did a copy of each of two large kernel trees I have lying around and diffed them, followed by an rm -rf of the copies. Everything stayed smooth and stable. Great work, folks. Here's to a merge with mainline! Regards, Sean. [0] It's

Hi list I just compiled 3.0rc1 on Solaris 9 (UltraSparc IIe) with gcc 3.3. Seems to work fine but I am surprised by the enormous size of the binaries: (ub-blade1):/usr/local/samba/sbin # ll total 232272 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 44719632 Aug 28 15:07 nmbd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 89726544 Aug 28 15:07 smbd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 44807356 Aug 28 15:07 swat -rwxr-xr-x

From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> > Btw, don't quote me on this one :) > I'm only 90% sure of the hotswapping capabilities, and less than 50% > sure about the price :) There _are_ systems with hot-swap CPUs, memory and/or, PCI[-X] slots. They are _not_ commodity and pricey, and require OS-level support. In fact, I believe Linux 2.6 has some support for

Invocation of randomForest() using the iris example in the help file crashes R with a segmentation fault. This happens on all of our ultraSPARC machines running Solaris 2.7. We're using R-1.4.1, compiled using Sun cc and f77 and the flags: CC=cc CFLAGS="-xO5 -xlibmil -dalign" FC=f77 FFLAGS="-xO5 -xlibmil -dalign" "make check" runs withour errors, and R has been

Santiago, I appreciate your offer. I'm not really a kernel hacker, however I do know C and I would be willing to try if you point me in the right direction. Here is my first attempt using Debian running on an UltraSPARC: debian{root}:/root<512>strace -f -F -v brctl addbr br0 execve("/usr/sbin/brctl", ["brctl", "addbr", "br0"], [/* 16 vars */]) =

Hello All, I keep getting rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (1074142 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165). Does anyone have any idea of what could cause this? I've gotten the same error on two seperate machines. One UltraSparc running Linux and the other a SparcStation running OpenBSD. We have an x86-SMP system running linux on the

Hello When I was using OpenSSH-2.9p2 in Solaris 8 sparcv9 (64bit) environment, I found some trouble that wtmpx has broken. The size of utmpx structure object becomes larger than 32 bit environment in sparcv9 environment.Therefore, instead of using utmpx structure object, using futmpx structure object is better. In sparcv9 environment, futmpx structure object is used instead of utmpx structure

Hello I am thinking of buying this card to and wanted to know if this NIC is supported. The card is a Sun Microsystems PCI-X Quad-Port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter QGEXPCI 501-6738-10. Can't find any info on how well the card plays with centos and also proxmox ve (if any of you use that distro ) If things don't seem to work I may bite the bullet and buy an Intel card thanks Rafeal Stewart

Full_Name: John Van Voorhis Version: 1.6.2 OS: SunOS 5.8 Submission from: (NULL) (128.8.130.192) While running initial 'make' everything went fine until src/unix. At which point it kept entering and exiting src/unix without doing anything. I fixed the problem by deleting the dependencies on Makefile for the Makedeps and R targets. I am using gnu Make 3.79, gcc 2.95.3, Solaris SunOS5.8

Dear Damien and Darren, I recently ran into a really weird and spooky ssh problem. My brain is going to mad trying to explain that it is a hardware issue since on two machines, one of which is a Celeon 2.8 Ghz with 1 GB RAM, another is a Xeon 4 CPU box with 3 Gig RAM and I guess 3 Ghz or something, both of which are running FreeBSD 6.1 with latest version of OpenSSH bundled with it. The version