search for: uhhh

...e a bet that windows XP has the highest priority in testing and composing new signatures > If they are supporting XP, it is all the same process. No difference. > sorry but to say it clear: to think a anti-virus can replace a solid operating system is a naive and dangerous attitude > Uhhh, Why do you not look at infections rates instead of marketing FUD. WannaCry did not even touch XP. Not looking at this from an infection rate standpoint and, instead, believing what the marketing weasels at M$ tell you is far more dangerous in my technical opinion. > with some luck malware...

...s! I don't yet understand why spill code is needed there at > all, but I'll return to that when I have branches working correctly. I'm not sure either. Can you send the code before and after register allocation? You might also try -regalloc=linearscan, as the default allocator is, uhhh, non-optimal. -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > While adding support for branch instructions in my backend, I run into a > > trouble. The code to handle branches looks like: > > The machine code after instruction selection is: > > > > entry (0x8681458): > > %reg1024 = load <fi#-1> > > %reg1025 = load

...kewise, if the primary process is on B or C. Let''s say you have an Apache process running on A and B. B is shadowing A on everything. It''s at the same point, has the same connections established, etc. Failover becomes merely "ungagging" B. How is this a LARTC problem? Uhhh... because this approach is seriously abusing the entire networking stack. We essentially have all three machines running with an identical MAC and IP address visible to the outside. The "distinct" address is purely internal. What this requires is a way of tricking all three machines int...

I just tried setting up a simple Rails app, after updating to the 1.1RC1 version of Rails. Generating a simple scaffold worked fine, and WEBrick started fine with script/server. I then went to the http://localhost:3000 page and clicked on the "About your application''s environment" link, and an error was displayed: NoMethodError in Rails/info#properties private method

...e is needed there > > at all, but I'll return to that when I have branches working correctly. > > I'm not sure either. Can you send the code before and after register > allocation? Attached. > You might also try -regalloc=linearscan, as the default > allocator is, uhhh, non-optimal. Ehm.... I get this: llc: LiveIntervals.cpp:166: virtual bool llvm::LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&): Assertion `r2iit != r2iMap_.end()' failed. - Volodya -------------- next part -------------- Code after instruction selection # Machine code for...

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:04 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > > A corrupted file could cause a fatal error or SEGV. > > Uhhh, that's not particularly useful. > "Corrupted" means really corrupted, like ELF header is broken. Is this really the case? > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 19:02 Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:51 PM, James Molloy via llvm-dev <...

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:51 PM, James Molloy via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > Clang doesn't call llc; LLVM is compiled into Clang. Clang does call the > system linker though. > > Making your compiler generate *object* code is very simple. Making it > fixup that object code and execute it in memory (JIT style) is also simple. >

Am 02.10.2017 um 07:25 schrieb ToddAndMargo via samba: > On 10/01/2017 10:03 PM, Reindl Harald (mobile) via samba wrote: >> sorry but to say it clear: to think a anti-virus can replace a solid >> operating system is a naive and dangerous attitude >> > > Uhhh,   Why do you not look at infections rates instead of > marketing FUD.  WannaCry did not even touch XP. so what - beause one specific malware did not proves nothing > Not looking at this from an infection rate standpoint and, > instead, believing what the marketing weasels at M$ tell &gt...

Hello Everyone, Does anyone know where to grab RPMs for nut? Or, at the very least, a spec file that could be used to build a new one for CentOS 4? I'd much rather use apcupsd, but the UPS in question is only supported via nut. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 16:26:44 up 9:56, 3 users, load average: 1.66, 0.92, 0.68

Hi, I did a search but I was able to find how to generate a random matrix. Can somebody let me know how to do it? Regards, Peng

git://gnx.ath.cx/syslinux.git On branch for_hpa, I've made the changes to resolve the issue noticed by Gert Hulselmans and confirmed as a bug by hpa and also show "-d" in the extlinux installer. (2 separate commits) -- -Gene

Hi, We recently got a PRI installed at one of our local centres however, we appear to be having interesting issues. Everything seems to be installed in the correct manner. asterisk*CLI> pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 16 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: EuroISDN Type: CPE Window Length: 0/7 Sentrej: 0 SolicitFbit: 0 Retrans: 0 Busy: 0 Overlap Dial: 0 T200 Timer: 1000 T203

Hi, is this the right place to ask for updated -extras- packages? this seems to be the successor of the 8.2.x branch and contains various bugfixes. Thx Rainer

...10.2017 um 07:25 schrieb ToddAndMargo via samba: >> On 10/01/2017 10:03 PM, Reindl Harald (mobile) via samba wrote: >>> sorry but to say it clear: to think a anti-virus can replace a solid >>> operating system is a naive and dangerous attitude >>> >> >> Uhhh,   Why do you not look at infections rates instead of >> marketing FUD.  WannaCry did not even touch XP. > > so what - beause one specific malware did not proves nothing The "So What" is the aggregate, not a single instance. You missed my point. > >> Not looking...

Hi all! I am looking for some software that would work as a proxy between a SIP device (SIP phones and ATA boxes) and the Asterisk system running IAX. The reason is that I can only get IAX trow the firewalls, and can't change the settings. One solution I am using are getting several Asterisk system communicate trow IAX bout in this case would I rater have every persons computer act as a proxy

The docs for the above-mentioned function say: This method may modify or replace the specified instruction, as long as it keeps the iterator pointing the the finished product. What does it mean to "keep an interator". Was "invalidates the iterator" intended, so something else. Another question, is how do I really replace the instruction. The operator= is private

Uhhh, what is wrong with how Active Directory is running? I have plenty of machines that are and are not attached to various NT-style and AD-style domains, hosted by Samba, and I can access the files I want. On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:35 PM Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: &g...

...ToddAndMargo via samba: >>> On 10/01/2017 10:03 PM, Reindl Harald (mobile) via samba wrote: >>>> sorry but to say it clear: to think a anti-virus can replace a >>>> solid operating system is a naive and dangerous attitude >>>> >>> >>> Uhhh,   Why do you not look at infections rates instead of >>> marketing FUD.  WannaCry did not even touch XP. >> >> so what - beause one specific malware did not proves nothing > > The "So What" is the aggregate, not a single instance.  You > missed my point. &gt...

Dear R People: If I put in: > findPerl Error: object 'findPerl' not found But if I use: > gdata:::findPerl function (perl, verbose = "FALSE") { errorMsg <- "perl executable not found. Use perl= argument to specify the correct path." if (missing(perl)) { perl = "perl" } perl = Sys.which(perl) if (perl == "" ||