Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27 matches for "tromp".
Did you mean:
tramp
2005 Mar 29
2
Annotation metadata "kills" help.search
...traced it down to the annotation packages. I
installed
GO, KEGG, mgu74[abc]v2 and hgu133plus2 all version 1.7.0
When I move these out of the library directory, help.search() functions
correctly again.
I have not tracked it any further -- just wanted to know if anyone else had
noticed it.
Gerard Tromp
2007 Dec 06
1
lm.influence under R2.6.1
...ached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] SMPracticals_1.1-1 ellipse_0.3-5
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] tools_2.6.1
Gerard
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Gerard Tromp, Ph.D
Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics Vox: 313.577.8773
& Department of Neurology fax: 313.577.5218
Wayne State University School of Medicine
3309 Scott Hall
540 East Canfield Ave.
Detroit, MI 48201
e-mail: gerard.tromp...
2005 Mar 30
1
[BioC] Follow-up to: Annotation metadata "kills" help.search
"Gerard Tromp" <gerard.tromp at sanger.med.wayne.edu> writes:
> Greetings,
>
> this is a follow-up to the mailing below. Seth Falcon replied and indicated
> that he and several others were unable to replicate the problem.
> Specifically he requested:
>
> ============
> We are...
2006 Mar 13
2
feature request/change for 2.6.8
Wayne,
I've been experimenting with the {pre,post}-xfer exec options ever since the original diff showed up in patches/ - fantastic stuff.
My feature request/change centers around the new RSYNC_ARG# variables. Would it be possible to make these available as an array (ie: ${RSYNC_ARG[#]}) rather than discrete variables? If nothing else, it would greatly simplify chewing through all the args
2004 Sep 22
2
question about 2.6.3pre2's --link-by-hash behaviour
I had noticed the --link-by-hash patch a short while back & decided it was time to experiment with it. Sadly, its behaviour is considerabely different from what I expected - to the point that I find it unusable in its current form. I had hoped to use it both for my rotating backups & for my (unofficial) slackware mirror.
For the test itself, I did the following:
- created 3 directories in
2007 Oct 16
3
To inc_recurse or not to inc_recurse? [Re: 3.0.0pre2: bookend breakage (2 different errors)]
On 10/15/07, Erik Jan Tromp <betageek@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> # The second error
> Invalid file index: -101 (-1 - 0) with iflags 0 [receiver]
> rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(273) [receiver=3.0.0pre2]
> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (21 bytes received so far) [generator]
>...
2007 Oct 06
2
non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1
It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote
listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. The symptom
itself is simple enough to see; rather than displaying member
directories/regular files/symlinks/etc as one would expect, only
non-directories (with the exception of '.') are listed.
Other tidbits.. some obvious, some maybe not:
- not limited to just
2006 Jan 05
7
repost - Can one edit the file that generates the scaffolding.css?
I am reposting this because not only am I VERY interested in the
answer but because I think it would also be useful to many, many people.
We kind of have a house-style here, so it would be nice if the
generated scaffold.css would accommodate that. My questions are?
Is it possible?
Is it safe?
How?
bruce
2003 Sep 08
4
Samba-3 Ldap Adding Administrator Account
How do you add an "Administrator" account to ldap.
I want to leave root in /etc/passwd but have "Administrator" in ldap
I have checked Howto Collection and the Samba-Ldap-3 but they contain no information. The Ldap-Howto has a suggestion but then says not to use.
Godfrey
2004 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Inline Assembly
...we can use native hardware features
that we can't use now?
For the former, we need inline i386/sparc/whatever support. For the
latter, LLVM intrinsics should do the trick, and do it rather portably.
The approach you suggest might work, although the code generator will
need to know not to tromp on your registers, I guess.
The bigger problem is GCC. GCC provides extended inline asm stuff that
will probably be painful to pass from GCC to LLVM (and Linux, BTW, uses
this feature a lot).
Another thought:
My impression is that inline assembly bites us a lot not because it's
used a lo...
2006 Jan 04
1
Passing parameters along
I have a simple form that asks for three variables: column, operation,
and data, which will allow my user to say things like "username starts
with A" or "email address contains hotmail".
This all works. I build up a conditions string and feed it into a
paginator.
What I''m working on now is making sure that my next and previous page
buttons continue to work.
2005 Jul 06
0
I was mistaken about Areski: he does relply to mails and help people.
Cher Areski,
Je m'excuse si je me suis tromp? sur vos intentions. Cependant j'aimerais souligner que je ne suis pas le seul a avoir trouv? l'installation de votre application un peu trop compliqu?e et les instructions du "Idiots Guide" impr?cises. Il faut dire que Linux n'est dej? pas facile pour un ancien de Microsoft c...
2004 Mar 26
1
2.6.1pre-1 Segmentation fault & other fun
Oops :)
-- quote --
$ rsync -aHPv rsync://host/module/single.file .
<motd, if any>
receiving file list ...
1 file to consider
Segmentation fault
-- endquote --
The rsync process remains running until explicitly 'kill'ed. At which point, the following is printed:
-- quote --
rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(225)
-- endquote --
-- quote --
$ rsync -aHPv
2005 Mar 17
1
odd behaviour change (2.6.3 > 2.6.4pre3)
Synopsis: Prior to the 2.6.4pre versions, issuing 'rsync rsync://host/module/' behaved effectively as 'ls -l'. I've toyed with various options in an attempt to get an 'ls -l' style output, but to no avail.
As I have a small handful of scripts that rely on this no-longer-functioning functionality, this could be considered a Bad Thing(TM).
Following is an example of
2005 Jun 10
1
rsync 2.6.5 segfault using --fuzzy & --link-dest
I've been reworking my backup script & decided to give some of the newer options a try. It would appear I've found a combination that doesn't play nice.
$ rsync --archive --delete-during --fuzzy --hard-links --numeric-ids
--quiet --sparse --temp-dir /backup/helium/
--link-dest /backup/hydrogen/tuesday/
--password-file /backup/helium/.password
rsync://backup@helium/backup/
2005 Jun 10
1
rsync 2.6.5 'max verbosity' snafu
Continuing with my backup script (see previous post), I've found a small oops regarding the 'max verbosity' option for rsyncd.conf
In the manpage this option is listed as a module option. Poking through the source, however, shows that it's parsed as a global option (loadparm.c).
If it's a question of which end to change, I would find this option being per module much more
2007 Oct 12
1
3.0.0pre2: non-recursive remote listing breakage
3.0.0pre2: non-recursive remote listing breakage
Looks like pre1's fix broke something else.
I noticed this when listing module/directory contents on servers known
to be running versions 2.5.7 & 2.6.3. Not having (full) access to them,
I replicated the errors using 2 machines on my home lan.
# the machines
lithium.elements.lan: the client. rsync 3.0.0pre2 for all tests.
2007 Oct 18
1
3.0.0pre2(cvs) error: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed.
Just a quick heads up to say I'm still getting this (reproducable) error while doing daily backups:
rsync: generator.c:1872: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed.
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe (32)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1500) [receiver=3.0.0pre2]
This is with cvs
2007 Oct 26
1
rsync error: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
I received the following error on the client when testing the pre2 release.
I'm not sure what it means or if it helps. Rsync 2.6.9 runs the same backup
without error. I compiled rsync under cygwin CVS so it may be an issue
there as well. Server side did not crash. It did log an error, but I'm
pretty sure it was due to the client-side crash. Rsync was running using an
ssh port
2007 Oct 27
1
3.0.0pre3: rfc-1149 speeds on 100 mbit lan
I upgraded to pre3 a couple hours ago & right now I'm watching my 00:00
backup set absolutely _crawl_. Typically, backups would have been
finished somewhere in the 00:10 to 00:30 range, depending how much data
changed across 6 machines in the past day. As I write this, the 3rd of 6
machines is (hopefully) just finishing its backup with no more than the
usual changes per machine. Whiskey