search for: total

...00001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001", "CEU0500000001"), Title = c("Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Private", "Total Pr...

# File app/models/timesheet.rb, line 27 27: def totals 28: totals = Hash.new 29: totals["Monday"] = totals["Tuesday"] = totals["Wednesday"] = totals["Thursday"] = totals["Friday"] = totals["Saturday"] = totals["Sunday"] = totals["Totals"]=0 #initi...

...uot;.", stringsAsFactors=FALSE) and viewing the data View(RevFCast) Some of the fields came in with the correct decimals and some not? The view in R: 5973157 1281576 -39811.51 -247443.9 994320.6 1534165 1384.30 -95835.69 1439713 3910730 -13913.00 -357694.2 3539123 2 Feb 2016 Totals: 2/28/2016 5159011 1231964 -47356.74 -372942.3 811664.5 1353568 -14169.24 -73436.06 1265963 3555562 -29385.31 -444792.8 3081384 3 Mar 2016 Totals: 3/31/2016 6695767 1438387 -49046.86 -344080.8 1045259.4 1593530 -1455.10 -100240.36 1491835 4559655 -39633.37 -361349.6 4...

...e shows a similar degradation) One issue I see is the following: - 'loop invariant code motion' seems to be depending on the result of the 'reassociate expression' pass: In the samples below I observer the following behavior: Both start with the same expression: %add = add i32 %total.0, %next.0 %add1 = add i32 %add, 1 -LLVM-3.1 converts this into: --after Reassociate expressions: %add = add i32 %next.0, 1 %add1 = add i32 %add, %total.0 -- after Canonicalize natural loops: %add = add i32 %next.0.ph, 1 %add1 = add i32 %add, %total.0 -- and during 'loop invariant co...

...gt; The view in R: > > > 5973157 > > 1281576 > > -39811.51 > > -247443.9 > > 994320.6 > > 1534165 > > 1384.30 > > -95835.69 > > 1439713 > > 3910730 > > -13913.00 > > -357694.2 > > 3539123 > > 2 > > Feb 2016 Totals: > > 2/28/2016 > > 5159011 > > 1231964 > > -47356.74 > > -372942.3 > > 811664.5 > > 1353568 > > -14169.24 > > -73436.06 > > 1265963 > > 3555562 > > -29385.31 > > -444792.8 > > 3081384 > > 3 > > Mar 2016...

I''ve had a go at determining exactly what happens when you create a filesystem without enough devices to meet the requested replication strategy: # mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/vdb # mount /dev/vdb /mnt # btrfs fi df /mnt Data: total=8.00MB, used=0.00 System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=4.00KB System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00 Metadata, DUP: total=153.56MB, used=24.00KB Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00 The data section is single-copy-only; system and metadata are DUP. This is good. Let''s add some data: # cp develop/lin...

...would send the code to the list for comments. Would be interested in hearing if there are potential problems with my code or easier ways of doing things. Please be nice, I know much of the "programming" here is probably naive. Best, Brett reliability.alpha<-function(x){ score.total<-0 var.items<-0 var.total<-0 z.x<-0 z.score.total<-0 z.var.items<-0 z.x<-scale(x, center = TRUE, scale = TRUE) n.items<-length(x) for (i in 1:n.items) score.total<-score.total + x[,i] for (i in 1:n.items) var.items<-var.items + var(x[,i]) for (i in 1:n.items...

Hi all: I'm attempting to create a faceted plot with ggplot2 and I'm having issues with a factor's order that is used to define the facet_grid(). The factor (named total.density) has three levels - 8, 16, and 32 - and I would like them presented in that order. Running order(levels(total.density)) yields the incorrect order of the facet grid - 2 3 1, corresponding with 16, 32, and 8. I have attempted correcting the order with the following solutions (of course, no...

...t; One issue I see is the following: > - 'loop invariant code motion' seems to be depending on the result of the 'reassociate expression' pass: > > In the samples below I observer the following behavior: > > Both start with the same expression: > %add = add i32 %total.0, %next.0 > %add1 = add i32 %add, 1 > > -LLVM-3.1 converts this into: > --after Reassociate expressions: > %add = add i32 %next.0, 1 > %add1 = add i32 %add, %total.0 > -- after Canonicalize natural loops: > %add = add i32 %next.0.ph, 1 > %add1 = add i32 %a...

...'loop invariant code motion' seems to be depending on the result of the 'reassociate expression' pass: > >> > >> In the samples below I observer the following behavior: > >> > >> Both start with the same expression: > >> %add = add i32 %total.0, %next.0 > >> %add1 = add i32 %add, 1 > >> > >> -LLVM-3.1 converts this into: > >> --after Reassociate expressions: > >> %add = add i32 %next.0, 1 > >> %add1 = add i32 %add, %total.0 > >> -- after Canonicalize natural loops: &gt...

Hi, This is my second day since owning empire total war. Really looking forward to playing it, but I have not. I'm using the latest wine program. I follow the winehq 's description for installing empire total war (installing d3dx9, changing registry, placing MSVCP80.dll at system32 and winecfg). Now, I'm stuck at the startup page (where...

...> > 994320.6 > > > > 1534165 > > > > 1384.30 > > > > -95835.69 > > > > 1439713 > > > > 3910730 > > > > -13913.00 > > > > -357694.2 > > > > 3539123 > > > > 2 > > > > Feb 2016 Totals: > > > > 2/28/2016 > > > > 5159011 > > > > 1231964 > > > > -47356.74 > > > > -372942.3 > > > > 811664.5 > > > > 1353568 > > > > -14169.24 > > > > -73436.06 > > > > 1265963 > &...

...setting initial state on com6 0.231013 00000050 = w32_serial_open (com6) 0.236014 Warning: no locking method is available: No error [The operation completed successfully. ] 0.244014 vmin_ 0, vtime_ 0 0.346020 action 0 0.398023 vtime 0, vmin 1 0.401023 ReadTotalTimeoutConstant -2, ReadIntervalTimeout -1, ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier -1 0.408024 vmin_ 1, vtime_ 0 0.410024 action 0 0.412024 vtime 0, vmin -1 0.414024 ReadTotalTimeoutConstant -2, ReadIntervalTimeout -1, ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier -1 0.521030 Trying megatec prot...

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs 7 avg 104.55 MB/s (user 0.08s sys 1.02s) clean total runs 4 avg 564.00 MB/s (user 0.01s sys 0.28s) read tree total runs...

...motion' seems to be depending on the result of the 'reassociate expression' pass: > > >> > > >> In the samples below I observer the following behavior: > > >> > > >> Both start with the same expression: > > >> %add = add i32 %total.0, %next.0 > > >> %add1 = add i32 %add, 1 > > >> > > >> -LLVM-3.1 converts this into: > > >> --after Reassociate expressions: > > >> %add = add i32 %next.0, 1 > > >> %add1 = add i32 %add, %total.0 > > >> -- af...

...b81ac For brevity .. set RSYNC="--archive --verbose --stats --recursive --times --perms --owner --group --links --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync" rsync $RSYNC --dry-run /path/030722.mj host2:/path/030722.mj building file list ... done Number of files: 1 Number of files transferred: 0 Total file size: 9416161 bytes Total transferred file size: 0 bytes Literal data: 0 bytes Matched data: 0 bytes File list size: 55 Total bytes written: 67 Total bytes read: 20 wrote 67 bytes read 20 bytes 58.00 bytes/sec total size is 9416161 speedup is 108231.74 The file is not listed. There are o...

...pear after the logs on the next rsync call in the cycle. *<snippet of rsync logs when the issue is seen>* 0000000328.txt * <<<<< corresponding to the rsync call in the while loop the command file is pulled* Number of files: 1 Number of files transferred: 1 Total file size: 108 bytes Total transferred file size: 108 bytes Literal data: 108 bytes Matched data: 0 bytes File list size: 28 File list generation time: 0.001 seconds File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds Total bytes sent: 53 Total bytes received: 213 sent 53 bytes received 213 bytes 76.00 bytes...

...Here, stripe-width should be 4* stride, not that it''ll make much difference. > >> Reiser3: > >> mount -t reiserfs /dev/md8 /mnt/md8 > >> mount -t reiserfs -o noatime,notail /dev/md8 /dev/md8 > >> > >> Ext4 results: > >> intial create total runs 10 avg 172.76 MB/s (user 0.43s sys 0.60s) > >> create total runs 14 avg 36.49 MB/s (user 0.42s sys 0.59s) > >> patch total runs 15 avg 15.16 MB/s (user 0.24s sys 0.49s) > >> compile total runs 14 avg 64.07 MB/s (user 0.10s sys 0.59s) > >> clean total runs 10...

...en compiler revisions). Using the standard Fibonacci example with clang and lldb from this afternoon: 1 #ifdef _MSC_VER 2 # define DEX_NOINLINE __declspec(noinline) 3 #else 4 # define DEX_NOINLINE __attribute__((__noinline__)) 5 #endif 6 7 DEX_NOINLINE 8 void Fibonacci(int terms, int& total) 9 { 10 int first = 0; 11 int second = 1; 12 13 for (int i = 0; i < terms; ++i) 14 { 15 int next = first + second; // DexWatch('i', 'first', 'second', 'total') 16 total += first; // DexWatch('i', 'first', 'second'...

...the remaining 2-nodes got the same symptoms. We started deleting some directories after which we were able to get the clusternodes up-and-running again. Is there a limit on files / directories for an ocfs2 filesystem ? I've read something about 32000 subdirectories but with 21450 directories total we weren't even close to that number. Thanks, Feite Brekeveld