search for: togethers

Hey all, ? I'm trying to get an E400P and 2 X100Ps working together in the one box and don't seem to be having much luck. ? I can get the two different types of boards working separately, but not together.? I've made calls on both the X100P and have seen sync and correct signalling on the E400P.? But when I try to enable to configs together I get the following: ? modprobe wcfxo

Hi folks, is anybody using those two products together and can give me any advice on how to do this? My specific issue has been addressed in other posts before, but as nobody responded, it would just now be interesting if anybody at least uses those applications together successfully? greets Malte

Check out textplot in the gregmisc package ... Federico Calboli <f.calboli@ucl.ac.uk> Sent by: r-help-bounces@stat.math.ethz.ch 07/13/2004 12:06 PM Please respond to f.calboli To: r-help <r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch> cc: Subject: [R] plotting a table together with graphs Dear All, I would like to ask how to add a table to a

I used the A9 schedule as an example: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMScheduleA9.td The documentation could use more clarity, but this is how I was able to do it to always get two specific instructions to be scheduled together. ________________________________________ From: reed kotler [rkotler at mips.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:54 PM To: Micah Villmow

Look, ma... spam! We dun never seen that 'n before. N. Sunkara RaviPrakash wrote: > > Hi, > > Imagine a billion Indians together. > > Already 3 million Indians have chosen Indyarocks.com to bring India > together. > > I am already part of it and dont be surprised if you find most of your > other friends too :). Also you can send Unlimited Free SMS to your

Reed, Couldn't you also use instruction scheduling classes and specify that the second instruction has a bypass from the first instruction? The scheduler should always schedule them together in that case. Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of reed kotler > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Hello. I am using the post-RA (Register Allocation) scheduler to avoid data hazards by inserting other USEFUL instructions from the program (besides NOPs) and it breaks apart some sequences of instructions which should remain "glued" together. More exactly, in my [Target]ISelDAGToDAG.cpp it is possible that I replace for example a BUILD_VECTOR with a machine SDNode called

Hi, I have built two R packages. One of them (PKG1) needs to use the functions of the other package (PKG2). So I need to link these two packages together, so that the functions of PKG2 can be available to PKG1. And when I load one package using 'library("PKG1")', PKG2 can be loaded at the same. Any ideas welcome. -- View this message in context:

On 09/17/2013 04:51 PM, Micah Villmow wrote: > Reed, > Couldn't you also use instruction scheduling classes and specify that the second instruction has a bypass from the first instruction? The scheduler should always schedule them together in that case. > > Micah > I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Can you point me to an example of that? TIA. Reed >>

That doesn't actually give you a guarantee that they won't be split up. Phases other than the scheduler may insert instructions in the middle of block (constant island pass, for example). Pseudo-instructions are the canonical answer to that problem. --Owen On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Micah Villmow <micah.villmow at smachines.com> wrote: > I used the A9 schedule as an

+the list again On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:48 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > On 09/17/2013 03:46 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >> On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:08 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> >>> Is there any way, except for using bundles, to force two instructions to be sequentially executed? >> What level of codegen are you working at?

Hi, Let's say we have a 32-bit architecture where 64-bit additions are done using 2 operations. Instructions are defined as follow in TableGen: defm ADD64 : ALU32<"add", 1, 1, addc>; defm ADD64C : ALU32<"addrc", 1, 2, adde>; Let's assume that the carry bit is implicit and that the 2 operations must *always* be stuck together for the 64-bit add to

I really have to force them to stuck together otherwise the carry will just not work. How about wrapping the 2 instructions in a bundle? Would that be a way? http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#machineinstr-bundles On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com>wrote: > Hi Francois, > > If you model the effect of your carry on the instructions, the

On 09/17/2013 03:52 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > +the list again > On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:48 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> On 09/17/2013 03:46 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >>> On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:08 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there any way, except for using bundles, to force two instructions to be

I have 20+ asterisk servers and need to network them together so a phone on any of the servers can call a phone on any other server without any trouble. I can think of IAX trunks between every server. So every server will have an IAX trunk to every server and then prefix bases routing in the dialplan for each server (I can give a number to each server and use that as a prefix for that server).

Hi There, Is there a way to group icecast servers, so they are found as one announcement on the YP directory lists and al servers will give all servers in there m3u. regards, Dennis Heerema

Hi Francois, If you model the effect of your carry on the instructions, the scheduler (and the other backend passes) should ensure that nothing that affects the carry will be inserted between your two instructions (assuming they are issued with nothing affecting the carry in between in the first place). Therefore, you shouldn’t have to force them to be stuck together. If you still do, what Jakob

Hi oddsock and others, Everything is clear about that, but where and how do i specify the servername, cannot find it in the docs and a threath about it on the archive (found via google) is not there anymore. Thanks, Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: <oddsock@oddsock.org> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 6:24 AM Subject: Re: [Icecast] How do I group

Using bundles here looks like a fragile way to handle that, IMHO. Really, using a pseudo instruction seems the best approach for you. For instance, you can match your add64 during isel with your pseudo instruction and expand it just before emitting the assembly file (add a pass using the hook: addPreEmitPass on your target). -Quentin On Apr 15, 2013, at 2:37 PM, Francois Pichet <pichet2000

Hello everyone, I am trying to understand how plot axis and rect might work together I would like to plot some values on a plot with x(0,100) and y(0,100) i want to see all the values from 0,1,2,3,4,5,.....100 written in the x and y axis. At the same time I want some grid to easily see when y and x values cross. Finally I want to paint red two of the cells created by this grid. I am trying