search for: thwarted

I am trying to implement a change to our Dialplan that will thwart tele-spammers that are calling us with blanked out caller ID. The caller IDs seem to vary between originating callers when they block caller ID. I've seen the following: "anonymous" "" So I'm checking for these. However recently one company seems to be bypassing this, so what I wanted to do was

I have produced RedHat 9.2.2-22 RPMS that include the ISC "delegate-only" patch that helps thwart Verisign''s wildcard .com and .net hijacking. These RPMs seem to run fine on RH9 (I''ve been running them since yesterday on ns1.shorewall.net). ftp://shorewall.net/pub/misc/ -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net

Hi,everyone here: whether or not CVE-2014-8242 affects rsync? any commnet would be appreciated!! Yadi

Yes I can see that this has been covered before, but here we start again. I'm new to wine, and new ish to linux. Have been trying to get Diablo II working for a while now. it starts off and almost straight away it stops, it dosn't exit it just sits there ocasionaly using a bit of cpu time (85% ish) I've left it for a long time (about 4 hours) with no dicernable change in

I've been lurking on the dev discussion on creating nat=auto. It all leads me to think there's no reason to use nat=no. We have about 60 internal sip extensions connected to an multihomed asterisk box where the external ip is not nat'ed. Each of the internal sip contexts has nat=no. On startup I get a slew of warnings about intruders being able to distinguish real extensions. But

On Tue, December 30, 2014 03:18, Digimer wrote: > What possible reason could they have for that? > > On 30/12/14 02:17 AM, Laurent Dumont wrote: >> By any change, is it a VPS? I know that my CloudAtCost (very cheap but >> extremely unreliable provider) prevents you from using SeLinux on their >> Centos image. No mysterious breakages == lower support costs. The same

Geert Stappers wrote: > Op 2013-08-05 om 16:11 schreef Dash Four: > >> Geert Stappers wrote: >> >>> Op 2013-08-05 om 12:29 schreef Dash Four: >>> >>>> Well, I am preparing the image using livecd-creator to install all >>>> the packages. This never completes, however, because there is a >>>> dependency on the

...ing. All disk activity had stopped and the system appeared to be hibernation. A push on the power button usually brings the system back to life, but in this case, the unlock screen was presented for only three seconds and then the hibernation mode was resumed.? Repeated attempts to log on were all thwarted due to this behavior.? ssh from other systems wasalso not possible. Holding the power button in order to initiate power down did not work either.? The result was the same as a one second press of front panel power button bringing up the unlock screen for only a short time.? We eventually removed t...

Taking the address of a function inhibits optimisations for that function. Essentially any ABI changes are unavailable if we can't adjust the call site to match. The case of interest here is when a given function is called directly and indirectly, and we don't want the latter to impose a cost on the former. One approach to avoid the ABI constraint cost is to extract/outline the body of an

I'm using dovecot 1.1.8 on a raq4 server running centos 4.8 Is it possible to set a time delay between all dovecot pop3-logins? say 20 - 30 seconds for example? My reason is I want to thwart the constant login attempts from hackers hunting for an open relay. It's no good blocking the ip address because every hack attempt comes in from a different address. I'm the only user on the

I have 3 servers 2 of which run CentOS 5.5, and one with 5.7. I was able to easily upgrade the PHP version to PHP 5.3.8 on the CentOS 5.5 boxes but was thwarted on the 5.7. Does anyone have any tips for how to get PHP 5.3.x installed on CentOS 5.7?

We're using rsync 2.5.6 version 26. Want to synch two W2K directories which are not on my machine (machine1 synchs machine2 -> machine3) I would like to synch the 2 direcories with the following syntax: rsync.exe -rva //remote_server1/share$/dir1/default.asp remote_server2::dir2/ When I try this it seems to work: building file list ... 1 file to consider send_files failed to open

It strikes me that the excluded_below mechanism at the beginning of recv_generator is useless from a security perspective. When a client pushes a daemon-excluded directory, the excluded_below mechanism causes the pushed contents of the directory to be skipped as well as the directory itself. However, the client can just as easily push descendant files individually. If the daemon administrator

Your characterization may be true but Skype works much better than SIP when it comes to sound quality. I have SIP softphone with Asterisk server and Skype on the same workstation. Skype just works better over the same network. Ron On 12/03/2015 9:26 AM, A J Stiles wrote: > On Thursday 12 Mar 2015, Thufir wrote: >> I'm testing Asterisk at home, crummy connection. Skype works fine

I'm testing Asterisk at home, crummy connection. Skype works fine for me, but every SIP client, even without using Asterisk, fails to connect. That's ok. Is swapping out SIP for Skype a big deal? Heh, well, I guess it's dead: http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/skype-for-asterisk If I have a really bad connection, can I "downgrade" SIP somehow? I

On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 22:44, Chris Lattner wrote: > We already have never, ever, delete this flags. "weak" and external > linkage both guarantee that. If there can be an external caller of some > function, for example, the optimizer CANNOT delete it, nor can it change > it's interface. Interesting, I wouldn't have assumed that given LLVM's support for IPO. If

On Thu, July 30, 2015 12:54, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>> Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure >>> than I was with the myopic ISP. >> >> "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) > > Yes I know, but I put

Hi David, Sure! Here's a function in sqlite3 called verifyDbFile, compiled with -O3. This is what it looks like when the intermediate bitcode is emitted by clang: link <https://pastebin.com/L3PrK1ac> And here's what happens after I run opt -O3 (no additional command-line arguments) on the file containing this function: link <https://pastebin.com/rZHBm2iU>. I'm not 100%

Both ssh-copy-id and ssh create .ssh as 0700. ssh-copy-id creates .ssh/authorized_keys as 0600. Thanks: Ryan Sawhill for finding the bug. --- customize/ssh_key.ml | 4 ++-- src/guestfs.pod | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/customize/ssh_key.ml b/customize/ssh_key.ml index 09664bf..dd6056f 100644 --- a/customize/ssh_key.ml +++

Hi, when trying to optimize socket transfer rates under Cygwin, it turned out that the underlying WinSock implementation is surprisingly sensitive to buffer sizes. The latest Cygwin from CVS is now setting the socket receive/send buffers (SO_RCVBUF/SO_SNDBUF) to 64K, rather than keeping them at their default values of 8K which thwarts data transfers a lot. While testing I still had the problem