search for: thwart

I am trying to implement a change to our Dialplan that will thwart tele-spammers that are calling us with blanked out caller ID. The caller IDs seem to vary between originating callers when they block caller ID. I've seen the following: "anonymous" "" So I'm checking for these. However recently one company seems to be bypassing...

I have produced RedHat 9.2.2-22 RPMS that include the ISC "delegate-only" patch that helps thwart Verisign''s wildcard .com and .net hijacking. These RPMs seem to run fine on RH9 (I''ve been running them since yesterday on ns1.shorewall.net). ftp://shorewall.net/pub/misc/ -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington U...

Hi,everyone here: whether or not CVE-2014-8242 affects rsync? any commnet would be appreciated!! Yadi

...lot longer than I think is a useful time to wait but I got distracted. I've tried changing my colour depth to 8bpp but that didn't seem to make any difference, anyone got any clue what it could be think so hard about, other than how much it (like all technology) my do it's best to thwart me at every turn (yes I do think that it's personal, technology's got it in for me and I'll be damned if I let it beat me!) Thanx in advance Wine rocks! PLEASE HELP I can kill windows if I can get this working! well ok it'll stay where it is but this is the only thing that I n...

I've been lurking on the dev discussion on creating nat=auto. It all leads me to think there's no reason to use nat=no. We have about 60 internal sip extensions connected to an multihomed asterisk box where the external ip is not nat'ed. Each of the internal sip contexts has nat=no. On startup I get a slew of warnings about intruders being able to distinguish real extensions. But

On Tue, December 30, 2014 03:18, Digimer wrote: > What possible reason could they have for that? > > On 30/12/14 02:17 AM, Laurent Dumont wrote: >> By any change, is it a VPS? I know that my CloudAtCost (very cheap but >> extremely unreliable provider) prevents you from using SeLinux on their >> Centos image. No mysterious breakages == lower support costs. The same

...the tool I use to build my images as I have been doing for the best part of 10 years. I use it, because it does the dirty work for me and it (usually) works well, so that I don't have to execute various shell scripts and build that image "manually" so to speak. I've managed to thwart the syslinux dependencies by creating a "dummy" package, so I resolved my little conundrum for the time being.

...ing. All disk activity had stopped and the system appeared to be hibernation. A push on the power button usually brings the system back to life, but in this case, the unlock screen was presented for only three seconds and then the hibernation mode was resumed.? Repeated attempts to log on were all thwarted due to this behavior.? ssh from other systems wasalso not possible. Holding the power button in order to initiate power down did not work either.? The result was the same as a one second press of front panel power button bringing up the unlock screen for only a short time.? We eventually removed...

...slation units, but we'd like to use a faster calling convention internally. If at the end of a pipeline we didn't actually want to change the function after all, we should be able to fold the two back together. I think that's plausibly a win. Taking the address of a function no longer thwarts other optimisations, in exchange for making the indirectly called function slightly slower. Thoughts? Jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200303/4ac5e0fb/attachment.html>

I'm using dovecot 1.1.8 on a raq4 server running centos 4.8 Is it possible to set a time delay between all dovecot pop3-logins? say 20 - 30 seconds for example? My reason is I want to thwart the constant login attempts from hackers hunting for an open relay. It's no good blocking the ip address because every hack attempt comes in from a different address. I'm the only user on the server so no-one else would be affected by such a delay. Thanks for any pointers -- View this m...

I have 3 servers 2 of which run CentOS 5.5, and one with 5.7. I was able to easily upgrade the PHP version to PHP 5.3.8 on the CentOS 5.5 boxes but was thwarted on the 5.7. Does anyone have any tips for how to get PHP 5.3.x installed on CentOS 5.7?

We're using rsync 2.5.6 version 26. Want to synch two W2K directories which are not on my machine (machine1 synchs machine2 -> machine3) I would like to synch the 2 direcories with the following syntax: rsync.exe -rva //remote_server1/share$/dir1/default.asp remote_server2::dir2/ When I try this it seems to work: building file list ... 1 file to consider send_files failed to open

It strikes me that the excluded_below mechanism at the beginning of recv_generator is useless from a security perspective. When a client pushes a daemon-excluded directory, the excluded_below mechanism causes the pushed contents of the directory to be skipped as well as the directory itself. However, the client can just as easily push descendant files individually. If the daemon administrator

...t's ok. >> >> Is swapping out SIP for Skype a big deal? > Stay away from Skype! It is a toxic, proprietary product. The lack of > interoperability by design is the antithesis of what a telecommunication > system should be about -- and the extent to which they have gone to thwart any > attempt at interoperability is truly shocking. > > For connecting two Asterisk installations to each other over the Internet, IAX > is better than SIP -- that's what it was designed for. > -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwheeler at artifact-softwar...

I'm testing Asterisk at home, crummy connection. Skype works fine for me, but every SIP client, even without using Asterisk, fails to connect. That's ok. Is swapping out SIP for Skype a big deal? Heh, well, I guess it's dead: http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/skype-for-asterisk If I have a really bad connection, can I "downgrade" SIP somehow? I

...all the function. Any barriers to doing this? > > None at all! Not so fast! I have a couple issues I need your clarification on: * The source level information could reference a function (in fact, it would reference all of them!). Could this reference to the function thwart optimization? Same for global variables, types, etc. * If I wanted to create a function named "GetModuleInfo" in every module, wouldn't that cause link time symbol redefinition and the resulting errors if it was "externally visible" linkage? If...

...s why all of my home traffic, internal and external, goes via an ssh pipe established through a system placed in front of the router. But how many consumers, and keep in mind that my ISP is one of the largest telecoms in the world, would even dream that such things happen? Much less take steps to thwart that surveillance? Or even know what steps are possible? This sort of stuff should be out and out illegal. But, as the router is the 'property' of the telecom it is up to them what they wish to have it do and the consumer's choice it put up with that or do without. We are living in...

...> >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:13 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> optnone on such functions should suffice - well, unless the calls > turn out to be dead & I don't think there's anything you can do to thwart > dead code removal. So what are you trying to preserve the function calls > for? > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 11:01 AM Shishir V Jessu via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello,...

...0o600 auth_keys ); (* Append the key. *) diff --git a/src/guestfs.pod b/src/guestfs.pod index 75afa9d..366d6f5 100644 --- a/src/guestfs.pod +++ b/src/guestfs.pod @@ -2244,6 +2244,23 @@ allowed a malformed filesystem to take over the appliance. If you use sVirt to confine qemu, that would thwart some attacks. +=head2 Permissions of F<.ssh> and F<.ssh/authorized_keys> + +L<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1260778> + +The tools L<virt-customize(1)>, L<virt-sysprep(1)> and +L<virt-builder(1)> have an I<--ssh-inject> option for injecting an SSH +key into...

...cket transfer rates under Cygwin, it turned out that the underlying WinSock implementation is surprisingly sensitive to buffer sizes. The latest Cygwin from CVS is now setting the socket receive/send buffers (SO_RCVBUF/SO_SNDBUF) to 64K, rather than keeping them at their default values of 8K which thwarts data transfers a lot. While testing I still had the problem that for some reason the ssh read transfer rates were only a third up to a half of the write transfer rates. It turned out that the culprit was ssh itself. In clientloop.c, it defines read buffers of the size 8K. Setting them to 64K u...