Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "te1".
Did you mean:
t1
2010 Oct 01
2
No translator path exists for channel type DAHDI (native 76) to 256
...|
N/A | 0 |
wanpipe7 | N/A | A101/1D/A102/2D/4/4D/8| 17 | 4 | 1 |
N/A | 0 |
wanpipe8 | N/A | A101/1D/A102/2D/4/4D/8| 17 | 4 | 1 |
N/A | 0 |
Wanrouter Status:
Device name | Protocol | Station | Status |
wanpipe1 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Connected |
wanpipe2 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
wanpipe3 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
wanpipe4 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
wanpipe5 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
wanpipe6 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
wanpipe7 | A...
2001 Sep 12
0
AES update..
...*/
- for(i = 0,p = 1; i < 256; ++i) {
- pow_tab[i] = (u1byte)p; log_tab[p] = (u1byte)i;
+#define FULL_UNROLL
- p = p ^ (p << 1) ^ (p & 0x80 ? 0x01b : 0);
- }
-
- log_tab[1] = 0; p = 1;
-
- for(i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
- rco_tab[i] = p;
+/*
+Te0[x] = S [x].[02, 01, 01, 03];
+Te1[x] = S [x].[03, 02, 01, 01];
+Te2[x] = S [x].[01, 03, 02, 01];
+Te3[x] = S [x].[01, 01, 03, 02];
+Te4[x] = S [x].[01, 01, 01, 01];
+
+Td0[x] = Si[x].[0e, 09, 0d, 0b];
+Td1[x] = Si[x].[0b, 0e, 09, 0d];
+Td2[x] = Si[x].[0d, 0b, 0e, 09];
+Td3[x] = Si[x].[09, 0d, 0b, 0e];
+Td4[x] = Si[x].[01, 01, 01, 0...
2011 Apr 08
2
a bug in "write.csv"?
Dear Rxperts!
A simple example where "write.csv" does not seem to accept user specified
arguments.. Why?
write.csv(t(1:10),"./te1.csv",quo=F,col.names=F)
Warning message:
In write.csv(t(1:10), "./te1.csv", quo = F, col.names = F) :
attempt to set 'col.names' ignored
However, write.table does fine..
write.table(t(1:10),"./te1.csv",quo=F,col.names=F,sep=",")
Would really apprecia...
2010 Nov 28
0
Problem in receiving calls from E1
Hi there!
I am having some difficult in receiving calls from my E1 link using mfcr2. I can make calls normally , but when I receive an incoming calls, the phone ring I answer it ,so, I listen busy tone and then the phone ring again and again.
look the log:
-- Executing [4801 at from-pstn-TE1:1] NoOp("DAHDI/2-1", ""1233220567" <1233220567>") in new stack -- Executing [4801 at from-pstn-TE1:2] Dial("DAHDI/2-1", "SIP/4801,25") in new stack == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Called 4801 -- SIP/4801-000000f9 is ringing -- SIP/...
2009 Dec 03
2
dahdi_tool shows no alarms, but no line connected
...rd.
Installation went well.
Anyway, wanrouter status shows a different result than
dahdi_tool or dahdi_scan.
I've just put a hardware loop on port 1. All the other
ports are open.
wanrouter status shows the expected result:
Device name | Protocol | Station | Status |
wanpipe1 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Connected |
wanpipe2 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
wanpipe3 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
wanpipe4 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |
However:
# dahdi_scan 2
[2]
active=yes
alarms=OK
description=wanpipe2 card 1
name=WPE1/1
manufacturer=
devicetype=
l...
2009 Oct 02
1
One side SIP goes dead on length conversation
...ease: 3.4.1
Wanpipe Config:
Device name | Protocol Map | Adapter | IRQ | Slot/IO | If's | CLK | Baud
rate |
wanpipe1 | N/A | A101/1D/A102/2D/4/4D/8| 169 | 4 | 1 |
N/A | 0 |
Wanrouter Status:
Device name | Protocol | Station | Status |
wanpipe1 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Connected |
Local sets are all Aastra 9143's.
- dbc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091002/a61750d7/attachment.htm
2011 Feb 17
0
PRI "wanrouter status" shows disconnected - system problem or Telco?
...is down since the morning (maybe
power intruptions). All seems fine except for "wanrouter status" shows
disconnected. Following are the alarms raised. Should I call telco (they
have long wait times) or should I just keep searching online for
troubleshooting tips. "*wanpipe1 | AFT TE1 | N/A | Disconnected |"
<<<<<* This is what shows.
root at pbx:~ $ wanpipemon -i w1g1 -c Ta
***** w1g1: T1 Rx Alarms (Framer) *****
*ALOS: OFF | LOS: ON*
*RED: ON | AIS: OFF*
*LOF: ON | RAI: OFF*
*
*
****** w1g1: T1 Rx Alarms (LIU) ******
*
*...
2005 Aug 05
1
Problem running Astrerisk after defined card in /etc/asterisk/zapatal.conf
...== Unregistered channel type 'Zap'
Aug 5 10:47:29 WARNING[1076842624]: loader.c:423 load_modules: Loading module chan_zap.so failed!
Here is the /proc/zaptel/1 file(seems to be correct, and log Messages too indicates the initialization is correct.):
Span 1: WCT1/0 "Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0" HDB3/CCS/CRC4 RED
1 WCT1/0/1 Clear
2 WCT1/0/2 Clear
3 WCT1/0/3 Clear
4 WCT1/0/4 Clear
5 WCT1/0/5 Clear
6 WCT1/0/6 Clear
7 WCT1/0/7 Clear
8 WCT1/0/8 Clear
9 WCT1/0/9 Clear
10 WCT1/0/10 Clear
11 WCT1/0/11 Clear
12 WCT1/0/12 Clear
13 WCT1/0/13 Clear
14 WCT1/0/14 Clear
15 WCT1/0/1...
2010 Apr 01
2
Problem with Sangoma A104 and euroisdn pri
...-- Below are my current configuration files and debugging output:
==begin zaptel.conf ====================
loadzone=us
defaultzone=us
span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=1-15,17-31
hardhdlc=16
==end zaptel.conf ======================
==begin wanpipe1.conf ==================
[devices]
wanpipe1 = WAN_AFT_TE1, Comment
[interfaces]
w1g1 = wanpipe1, , TDM_VOICE, Comment
[wanpipe1]
CARD_TYPE = AFT
S514CPU = A
CommPort = PRI
AUTO_PCISLOT = NO
PCISLOT = 4
PCIBUS = 13
FE_MEDIA = E1
FE_LCODE = HDB3
FE_FRAME = NCRC4
FE_LINE =...
2011 Apr 18
1
A101DE Sangoma Card in AsteriskNow 1.7.1
Hi,
I have A101DE Sangoma Card(
http://www.sangoma.com/products/hardware_products/digital_voice_and_data_networking/a101.html
)
lspci shows as 03:04.0 Network controller: Sangoma Technologies Corp.
A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card
[root at asterisk ~]# lspci -vvv -s 03:04.0
03:04.0 Network controller: Sangoma Technologies Corp. A200/Remora FXO/FXS
Analog AFT card
Subsystem: Unknown device
2004 Mar 02
0
^_^ meay-meay! (PR#6639)
...CKCU2clida1ooXMfcx4yF0/QTNIz0/c1ZA6C2gx4I/AyTpk72iCMNFYadLYBXR7IGr
aerefU/zAodZ+w9EMh6L7wyfzVdimmdg4BsnUiSDC2xxZs6g+Y17hG2R+0/GO7CiMOOZiXdI
55GSKIPg5G2P1254OArOt+3SeEVKZmrtkrHaO52mNS37irQDTjsfNLYs8GV75K8BDL7Evdy4
WTntjS+PafhyyZZXZ60tQUqK2AbmWa1rzPZtXKgIUHopFR8a84cTQ9LCj5d8AaXEE9HWh2n8
51XU7PFEPZbKZ/tE1/dNGh32ZXf6cSM/aL4u0pIwb6hmvtzWkA+XbfynXQtBwYfMUn3IMsjs
7g4Dk4loGbuRtAuzNuxeZWaCwvztnxOC4UwsUYwB+Iy1ojOGIIXtgiNUOtuauUYbn6FBTatv
y3Up+nzM26YKBG71EweqUHt0KtP3LicfDzPXtEu86Jm/Q93Pj2Jylg12RTZCC36xhC/8OYOs
pPvPrsaOmSS9zvImfv6XqyqPD+q8xd65vDMNfKXeu8++B4k8CZuUeS2gwwbzPzbcn8h484cI
AWpocV8hoOLi+CXXwQLxgRvF7...
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking